Periodic Homogenization in Crystal Plasticity: A Comparative Study between 3D and 2D

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, macroscopic behavior obtained from crystal plasticity finite element simulations of irregularly shaped 3D and 2D volume elements (VEs) are compared. These morphologically periodic VEs are generated using the open-source software library Voro++. Periodic boundaryconditions are utilized to homogenize the material response employing a prescribed macroscopic deformation gradient tensor. To accelerate the assignment of periodic boundary conditions, a conformalmesh is employed by which periodic couples of faces on the hull of the volume element have identicalmesh patterns. In the simulations, plane strain conditions are assumed, which means that the averagethickness strain in 3D VEs is set to zero. However, grains are allowed to strain in the thickness direction. In the case of 2D VEs, plane strain elements are used. The principal goal of this comparison isto evaluate the accuracy of 2D VEs simulations. In the current study, two kinds of 2D VEs are generated: 1) Slicing 3D VEs normal to the thickness direction, 2) Separately generating 2D VEs. The firstmethod corresponds to sectioning 3D microstructures using EBSD. This approach is generally usedas an assumed more accurate alternative to 2D VEs. Based on the results, there is a large gap betweenthe flow curves of 2D and 3D VEs. Additionally, 2D sectioning of 3D VEs does not necessarily endup in higher precision in material behavior predictions.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Hill. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles,. In: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 11.5 (1963), pp.357-372.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-x

Google Scholar

[2] A. Lewis and A. Geltmacher. Image-based modeling of the response of experimental 3D microstructures to mechanical loading,. In: Scripta Materialia 55.1 (2006), pp.81-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.043

Google Scholar

[3] J. H. Kim et al. Crystal plasticity approach for predicting the Bauschinger effect in dual-phase steels,. In: Materials Science and Engineering: A 539 (2012), pp.259-270.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.092

Google Scholar

[4] B. Anbarlooie et al. Experimental and 3D micromechanical analysis of stress-strain behavior and damage initiation in dual-phase steels,. In: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 28.5 (2019), pp.2903-2918.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04029-8

Google Scholar

[5] H. Lim et al. Investigating mesh sensitivity and polycrystalline RVEs in crystal plasticity finite element simulations". In: International Journal of Plasticity 121 (2019), pp.101-115.[6] P. G. Christodoulou et al. "Role of crystallographic orientation on intragranular void growth in polycrystalline FCC materials,. In: International Journal of Plasticity 147 (2021), p.103104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.06.001

Google Scholar

[7] J. Mayeur and D. McDowell. A three-dimensional crystal plasticity model for duplex Ti- 6Al-4V,. In: International journal of plasticity 23.9 (2007), pp.1457-1485.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.006

Google Scholar

[8] A. Ramazani et al. Correlation between 2D and 3D flow curve modelling of DP steels using a microstructure-based RVE approach,. In: Materials Science and Engineering: A 560 (2013), pp.129-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.046

Google Scholar

[9] C. Thomser. "Modelling of the mechanical properties of dual phase steels based on microstructure.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Qayyum et al. Effect of 3D representative volume element (RVE) thickness on stress and strain partitioning in crystal plasticity simulations of multi-phase materials,. In: Crystals 10.10 (2020), p.944.

DOI: 10.3390/cryst10100944

Google Scholar

[11] C. H. Rycroft. A three-dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++. Tech. rep. LBNL-1432E. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Feb. (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] E. Asik, E. Perdahcioglu, and T. van den Boogaard. An RVE-Based Study of the Effect of Martensite Banding on Damage Evolution in Dual Phase Steels,. English. In: Materials 13.7 (Apr. 2020).

DOI: 10.3390/ma13071795

Google Scholar

[13] J. Mandel. Généralisation de la théorie de plasticité de WT Koiter,. In: International Journal of Solids and structures 1.3 (1965), pp.273-295.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(65)90034-x

Google Scholar

[14] J. R. Rice. Inelastic constitutive relations for solids: an internal-variable theory and its application to metal plasticity,. In: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 19.6 (1971), pp.433-455.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-x

Google Scholar

[15] G. I. Taylor. The mechanism of plastic deformation of crystals. Part I.-Theoretical,. In: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 145.855 (1934), pp.362-387.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1934.0106

Google Scholar

[16] M. Becker. Incompatibility and instability based size effects in crystals and composites at finite elastoplastic strains,. PhD thesis. Institut für Mechanik (Bauwesen), Lehrstuhl I, (2006).

Google Scholar

[17] S. P. Lloyd. Least Square Quantization in PCM,. In: IEEE transcation o information theory IT-28.2 (Mar. 1982), pp.129-137.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.1982.1056489

Google Scholar

[18] V. Kouznetsova, W. Brekelmans, and F. Baaijens. An approach to micro-macro modeling of heterogeneous materials,. In: Computational mechanics 27.1 (2001), pp.37-48.

DOI: 10.1007/s004660000212

Google Scholar