Materials for Hydrogen Storage and Transport: Implications for Risk-Based Inspection

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing interest towards hydrogen technologies and their implementation in the hydrocarbon and chemical process industry makes maintenance planning of storage and transport equipment an emerging safety aspect. With respect to high-pressure working equipment, Risk-Based Inspection methodology (RBI) aims at minimizing the risk of loss of containment due to materials’ deterioration mechanisms. This set of procedures focuses on the mechanical integrity of equipment to achieve crucial risk mitigation by means of risk-informed inspection planning and maintenance activities. In addition, hydrogen-induced damages are often generalized or even neglected by the existing RBI standards and recommended practices. On this basis, high-pressure vessels, process piping and storage tanks working in gaseous or liquid hydrogen environments, which are exposed to hydrogen-induced deterioration mechanisms, might be subjected to an inaccurate evaluation of the associated risk and hazards when these RBI standards are applied. For this reason, this work proposes a review of the pipelines steels commonly used for gaseous hydrogen transport to investigate the possible limitations of the standard RBI planning methodologies, when applied to hydrogen technologies. More accurately, the pipeline steels’ susceptibility to hydrogen-induced degradations mechanisms will be discussed to underline assumptions and hypothesis limiting the conventional RBI applicability. Therefore, the overall suitability of standard RBI planning with respect to hydrogen equipment is discussed, highlighting possible relevant gaps as a general result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

221-230

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] National Institute of Science and Technology, NIST, (2021). https://www.nist.gov/.

Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. REPowerEU Plan, (2022), https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/ EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN&qid=1653033742483

Google Scholar

[3] Fuel-Cells and Hydrogen Observatory. Hydrogen Pipelines, (2022), https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-systems-integration/hydrogen_en.

Google Scholar

[4] European Commission. A Hydrogen Strategy for a Climate-Neutral Europe, (2020), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0301.

Google Scholar

[5] Safe hydrogen fuel handling and use for efficient implementation 2. SH2IFT-2, (2021), https://sh2ift-2.com/.

Google Scholar

[6] American Petroleum Institute, API 5L, (2018)

Google Scholar

[7] A. Hagen and A. Alvaro. Hydrogen Influence on Mechanical Properties of Pipeline Steels. SINTEF Industri, (2020), ISBN: 978-82-14-06311-0.

Google Scholar

[8] D.L. Olson et al. ASM Handbook Volume 6: Welding, Brazing, and Soldering. ASM International, (1993), ISBN: 978-0-87170-382-8.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Laureys et al. "Use of existing steel pipeline infrastructure for gaseous hydrogen storage and transport: A review of factors affecting hydrogen induced degradation". In: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 101 (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104534

Google Scholar

[10] The American Society of Mechanical Engineering. Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. ASME B31.12. (2011)

Google Scholar

[11] A. Alvaro. "3D cohesive modelling of hydrogen embrittlement in the heat affected zone of X70 steel". PhD thesis. 2014. ISBN: 978-82-326-5575-5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.097

Google Scholar

[12] T.L. Anderson. Fracture Mechanics, Fundamentals and Applications. Third Edition. CRC Press, 2005. ISBN: 978-1-4200-5821-5.

Google Scholar

[13] R.P. Gangloff, "Hydrogen Assisted Cracking of High Strength Alloys", In: Comprehensive Structural Integrity 6, 31-131 (2003)

Google Scholar

[14] M.B. Djukic et al., "The synergistic action and interplay of hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms in steels and iron: Localized plasticity and decohesion". In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics 216, (2019)

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106528

Google Scholar

[15] H.K. Birnbaum and P. Sofronis, "Hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity – a mechanism for hydrogen-related failure". In: Materials Science and Engineering, A176 (1994) 191-202

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(94)90975-X

Google Scholar

[16] C.L. Davis and J.E. King, "Cleavage Initiation in the Intercritically Reheated Coarse-Grained Heat-Affected Zone: Part I. Fractographic Evidence". In: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 25, 563-573 (1994)

DOI: 10.1007/BF02651598

Google Scholar

[17] American Petroleum Institute. API RP 581. 2019.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Campari et al. "Applicability of Risk-based Inspection Methodology to Hydrogen Technologies: A Preliminary Review of the Existing Standards". In: Proceedings of the 32nd European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2022) (2022)

DOI: 10.3850/978-981-18-5183-4_r13-01-095-cd

Google Scholar

[19] F. Ustolin et al, "Risk-based inspection planning for hydrogen technologies: review of currents standards and suggestions for modification". In: 9th Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference (MESIC 2021)

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1193/1/012075

Google Scholar

[20] A. J. Sfilka et al. "Fatigue Measurement of Pipeline Steels for the Application of Transporting Gaseous Hydrogen". In: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology (2018)

DOI: 10.1115/1.4038594

Google Scholar

[21] F. Ustolin et al., "An Extensive Review of Liquid Hydrogen in Transportation with Focus on the Maritime Sector". In: Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, (2022)

DOI: 10.3390/jmse10091222

Google Scholar