Performance Analysis of the Protection Effect Cow Bone and Coconut Shell Particulates on 1170 Aluminium Alloy in Dilute Electrolytes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Particulates of cow bone (CB) and coconut shell (CS) were infused within the microstructure of 1170 aluminium alloy and studied for their influence on the corrosion resistance of the resulting aluminium matrix composites in 3.5% NaCl, 0.05 M H2SO4 and 3.5% NaCl/0.05 M H2SO4 solution by weight loss method. Corrosion rate data shows CB and CS significantly influenced the electrochemical properties of the composite. Protection performance data at 336 h of exposure shows CB and CS particulate significantly reduced the corrosion resistance of the aluminium alloy at all weight compositions in 3.5% NaCl solution. In 0.05% H2SO4 solution, CB improved the corrosion resistance of the composite at 5% - 15% weight composition (37.8%, 23.22% and 23.22%), while CS improved the corrosion resistance at 10% and 20% weight composition (37.65% and 28.52%). The corresponding values for CB in 3.5% NaCl/0.05 M H2SO4 solution occurred at 5% - 15% weight composition (34.26, 31.71% and 22.68%) while for CS it occurred at 10 and 15% weight composition (40.52% and 46.05%). Data from ANOVA statistical tool shows particulate weight composition and exposure time are both relevant determinant variables (greater than the theoretical significance factor) influencing the protection performance outputs of CB and CS with values ranging between 41.82% to 92.5% for weight composition and 5.68% and 53.03% for exposure time. Standard deviation data for CB particulate varied minimally only at 20% weight composition in 3.5% NaCl solution. The corresponding data at other CB weight compositions and for coconut shell at all weight compositions varied significantly due to thermodynamic instability.In 0.05 M H2SO4 and 3.5% NaCl/0.05 M H2SO4 solutions, all standard deviation values for CB and CS particulates (excluding CB at 29% weight composition) at all weight compositions vary minimally from the mean data signifying thermodynamic stability of the electrochemical reactions on the composite surfaces with respect to exposure time. The proportion of data above 20% protection performance for CB and CS particulates in 3.5% NaCl solution is 0% at margins of error of 0%. The corresponding values in 0.05 M H2SO4 solution are 15.18% and 15.32% at margins of error of 40% and 43% while the values from 3.5% NaCl/0.05 M H2SO4 solution are 14.78% and 15.5% at margins of error of 35% and 50%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

93-102

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L.A. Dobrzański, A.D. Dobrzańska-Danikiewicz, Why are carbon-based materials important in civilization progress and especially in the industry 4.0 stage of the industrial revolution, Mater. Perform. Charact. 8(3) (2019) 337–370.

DOI: 10.1520/mpc20190145

Google Scholar

[2] M. Patel, B. Pardhi, S. Chopara, M. Pal, Lightweight composite materials for automotive-a review, Carbon. 1(2500) (2018) 151.

Google Scholar

[3] O.J. Shesan, A.C. Stephen, A. G. Chioma, R. Neerish, S. E. Rotimi, Improving the mechanical properties of natural fiber composites for structural and biomedical applications, in Renewable and sustainable composites, IntechOpen, London, 2019, p.1–27.

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85252

Google Scholar

[4] X. Deng, G. Zhang, C. Qiang, J. Xu, Influence of mechanical alloying on the mechanical and tribological properties of SiC particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites, Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. 9(11–12) (2015) 1535–1543.

Google Scholar

[5] A.K. Sharma, R. Bhandari, A. Aherwar, R. Rimašauskienė, Matrix materials used in composites: A comprehensive study, Int. Conf. Mech. Energy Technol. 21 (2020) 1559–1562.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.086

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Li, W. Gao, Chapter 12 - Oxidation of metal matrix composites, In Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering, Developments in High Temperature Corrosion and Protection of Materials, Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp.365-397.

DOI: 10.1533/9781845694258.2.365

Google Scholar

[7] M. Patel, B. Pardhi, D.P. Sahu, S.K. Sahu, Different techniques used for fabrication of aluminium metal matrix composites, Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.

DOI: 10.29126/23951303/ijet-v7i1p1

Google Scholar

[8] J. Emsley, Aluminium-Royal Society of Chemistry. https://edu.rsc.org/elements/aluminium/ 2000014.article#commentsJump

Google Scholar

[9] A.A. Adediran, K.K. Alaneme, I.O. Oladele, E. T. Akinlabi, Microstructural characteristics and mechanical behaviour of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with Si-based refractory compounds derived from rice husk, Cogent Eng. 8(1) (2021).

DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2021.1897928

Google Scholar

[10] G.A. Manjunath, S. Shivakumar, R. Fernandez, R. Nikhil, P. C. Sharath, A review on effect of multi-directional forging/multi-axial forging on mechanical and microstructural properties of aluminum alloy, Int. Conf. Mater. Syst. Eng. 47 (2021) 2565–2569.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.056

Google Scholar

[11] O.M. Ikumapayi, E.T. Akinlabi, J.D. Majumdar, Influence of carbonaceous agrowastes nanoparticles on physical and Mechanical properties of friction stir processed AA7075-T651 metal matrix composites, Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 7(3) (2019).

DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/ab3aae

Google Scholar

[12] K.O. Babaremu, O.O. Joseph, E.T. Akinlabi, T.C. Jen, O.P. Oladijo, Morphological investigation and mechanical behaviour of agrowaste reinforced aluminium alloy 8011 for service life improvement, Heliyon, 6(11) (2020) e05506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05506

Google Scholar

[13] O.S. Olusesi, N. E. Udoye, Development and characterization of AA6061 aluminium alloy /clay and rice husk ash composite, Manuf. Lett. 29 (2021) 34–41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2021.05.006

Google Scholar

[14] A. Verma, A. Pal, S.P. Dwivedi, S. Sharma, Physical, mechanical and thermal behavior of recycled agro waste GSA reinforced green composites, Mater. Test. 61(9) (2019) 894–900.

DOI: 10.3139/120.111399

Google Scholar

[15] C.A. Loto, R.T. Loto, O.O. Joseph, A.P.I. Popoola, Corrosion inhibitive behaviour of camellia sinensis on aluminium alloy in H2SO4, Int. J. Elect. Sci. 9(3) (2014) 1221 - 1231.

Google Scholar

[16] R.T. Loto, Corrosion inhibition effect of non-toxic α-amino acid compound on high carbon steel in low molar concentration of hydrochloric acid, J. Mater. Res. Techn. 8(1) (2019) 484 - 493.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.09.005

Google Scholar

[17] R.T. Loto, Electrochemical analysis of the corrosion inhibition properties of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde on low carbon steel in dilute acid media, Cogent Eng. 3(1) (2016) 1242107.

DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1242107

Google Scholar

[18] C.A. Loto, Stress corrosion cracking: characteristics, mechanisms and experimental study, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 93(9) (2017) 3567–3582.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0709-z

Google Scholar

[19] R.T. Loto, Pitting corrosion evaluation and inhibition of stainless steels: A review, J. Mats. Env. Sci. 6(10) (2015) 2750 – 2762.

Google Scholar

[20] M.K. Egbo, A fundamental review on composite materials and some of their applications in biomedical engineering, J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 33(8) (2021) 557–568.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.07.007

Google Scholar

[21] R.T. Loto, Anti-corrosion performance of the synergistic properties of benzenecarbonitrile and 5-bromovanillin on 1018 carbon steel in HCl environment, Sci. Rep., 7(1) (2017) 17555.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17867-0

Google Scholar

[22] K.V. Akpanyung, R.T. Loto, M.A. Fajobi, An overview of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) corrosion in the refining unit, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1378(2) (2019) 022089.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022089

Google Scholar

[23] S. Roseline, V. Paramasivam, Microstructural and corrosion aspects of aluminum-zirconia metal matrix composites in acidic condition, SSRG Int. J. Mech. Eng. 6 (2019) 19–23.

DOI: 10.14445/23488360/ijme-v6i11p104

Google Scholar