Printability and Mechanical Properties of PLA/Iron Composites for FDM 3D Printing

Korbkaroon Doungkeaw; Jennarong Tungtrongpairoj

doi:10.4028/p-YO4cZK

Paper Titles

Design of Experiment for Determining Setting Parameter on Plasma Arc Machining for Stainless Steel Plate Cutting with Full Factorial Design
p.11

Titanium Nitriding: A Systematic Literature Review
p.25

Sheet Forming of Roll Cast Aluminum Alloy for Die Casting
p.35

Mechanical Behavior and Void Analysis of 3D Printed PEEK by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) with Varying Infill Patterns
p.41

Printability and Mechanical Properties of PLA/Iron Composites for FDM 3D Printing
p.47

Enhanced Electrical Conductivity of Graphene-Incorporated Copper Wire and its Performances on Coaxial Cable Application at Sub 6 GHz
p.55

Magneto-Conductive and Magnetic Properties in La_1-xSr_xMnO₃Thin Films on a-SiO₂ Substrates Produced by Metal Organic Decomposition Method
p.61

Experiments of Failure and Damage in ITO-Coated PC/FPC with ACF Bonding due to Bending Fatigue
p.67

Fabrication of Liquid-Metal Printed 2D Tin Oxide Nanosheets for Optoelectronic Applications
p.73

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 978Printability and Mechanical Properties of PLA/Iron...

Printability and Mechanical Properties of PLA/Iron Composites for FDM 3D Printing

Abstract:

Metal particle reinforcement plays an important role in the mechanical properties and printability of composite materials for FDM 3D-printing technology. PLA/Iron composite filament is widely used in many applications, such as magnetic and biomedical devices. This research aims to study the effect of iron particles on the printability and mechanical properties of PLA/Iron composite and compare it with another PLA composite of PLA/Stainless steel composite. The PLA/Iron (Fe) and PLA/Stainless steel (SS) composites were printed at different printing temperatures between 260-290 °C, printing speeds between 30-90 mm/s, and infill density of 100%. The max stress and elongation of printed PLA/Fe composite were higher than that of printed PLA/SS composite about 1.5 and 1.2 times. Moreover, the highest max stress of printed PLA/Fe composite specimens was 40.20 MPa at a printing temperature of 280 °C and printing speed of 60 mm/s. The optical microscope observed the homogeneous iron and stainless-steel particle distribution in PLA composite matrix and revealed the printed structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Nanostructures, Nanomaterials and Nanoengineering & Materials Technology and Applications

View Preview

Materials Processing Technologies, Waste Treatment and Food Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 978)

Pages:

47-51

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-YO4cZK

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2024

Authors:

Korbkaroon Doungkeaw, Jennarong Tungtrongpairoj*

Keywords:

3D-printing Technology, Iron Particle Reinforcement, PLA, Polymer Matrix Composite

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] J. Tungtrongpairoj, K. Doungkeaw, B. Thavornyutikarn and V. Uthaisangsuk: J Mater Sci Vol. 58 (2023), pp.4165-4183.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-023-08274-0

Google Scholar

[2] I.J. Solomon, P. Sevvel and J. Gunasekaran: Materials Today: Proceedings Vol. 37 (2021), pp.509-514.

Google Scholar

[3] W. Gao, Y. Zhang, D. Ramanujan, K. Ramani, Y. Chen, C.B. Williams, Charlie C.L. Wang, Y.C. Shin, S. Zhang, and P.D. Zavattieri: Computer-Aided Design Vol. 69 (2015), pp.65-89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001

Google Scholar

[4] M. Javaid and A. Haleem: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research Vol. 9, Issue 3 (2019), pp.179-185.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Zhang, Y. Wu, K. Wang, Y. Peng, D. Wang, S. Yao, and J. Wang: Materials & Design Vol. 196 (2020), 109140.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Yang, J. Zeng, H. Long, J. Xiao, Y. Luo, J. Gu, W. Zhou, Y. Wei, and X. Dong: Polymers Vol.12 Issue 3 (2020), 621.

Google Scholar

[7] V.S. Vakharia, L. Kuentz, A. Salem, M.C. Halbig, J.A. Salem and M. Singh: Polymers Vol. 13 Issue 20 (2021), 3545.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13203545

Google Scholar

[8] C. Venkatesh, E. Fuenmayor, P. Doran, I. Major, J.G. Lyons, and D.M. Devine: Procedia Manufacturing Vol. 38 (2019), pp.17-24.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] A. Amirov, A. Omelyanchik, D. Murzin, V. Kolesnikova, S. Vorontsov, I. Musov, K. Musov, S. Khashirova and V. Rodionova: Processes Vol.10 Issue 10 (2022), 2412.

DOI: 10.3390/pr10112412

Google Scholar

[10] J. Lee, H. Lee, K. Cheon, C. Park, T. Jang, H. Kim, and H. Jung: Additive Manufacturing Vol. 30 (2019) 100883.

Google Scholar