Thermal Imaging: An Alternative Approach for Crack Identification in Solar Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research paper presents a comprehensive study on the identification of cracks in solar panels using a combination of electroluminescence (EL) and thermal imaging techniques. The EL imaging was utilized to capture the electroluminescent response of the panels, highlighting any irregularities in the cell structure caused by cracks. While thermal imaging was used to identify temperature variations indicative of crack locations due to localized heat dissipation. The results of the study demonstrate the efficacy of each imaging technique in crack detection. EL imaging exhibited high sensitivity to cracks, providing detailed information about the location and extent of the damage. Thermal imaging, on the other hand, revealed temperature differentials in cracked areas. Furthermore, thermal imaging can expediently assess health of solar panels insofar as both methods were successful in identifying major defects in solar panels. In addition, the research paper discusses the advantages and limitations of each imaging technique, providing insights into their applicability in real-world solar panel inspection scenarios. The thermal imaging showed that a temperature difference of ten degree Celsius between average and peak temperature on solar panels showed major cracks or faults in the panel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

85-91

Citation:

Online since:

November 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Kunze, I. Kajari-Schröder, S. Breitenmoser, X. Bjørneklett, B. Köntges, The risk of power loss in crystalline silicon based photovoltaic modules due to micro cracks., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, (2011) 1131–1137.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.034

Google Scholar

[2] M. Berardone, I. Infuso, A. Corrado, M. Paggi, Fatigue degradation and electric recovery in Silicon solar cells embedded in photovoltaic modules, Sci Rep 4, (2014) 4506.

DOI: 10.1038/srep04506

Google Scholar

[3] M. Berardone, I. Martire, M. Paggi, An electric model of cracked solar cells accounting for distributed damage caused by crack interaction , Energy Procedia 92, (2016) 576–584.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.022

Google Scholar

[4] K. Kosters, H. Diehl, M. Mertens, Low-Cost-Outdoor-EL: Cost-Efficient Extensive On-Site Quality Analysis of Solar Modules, 31st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. vol. 5BV, 2.42, (2015) 2300–2302.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Berner, M. Stoicescu, L. Werner, J. Kropp, Self-sourced daylight electroluminescence from photovoltaic modules, IEEE J. Photovolt. 7 (2017) 1184–1189.

DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2017.2714188

Google Scholar

[6] W. Eder, G. Voronko, Y. Spielberger, H. Sonnleitner, H. Knoebl, K. Ebner, R. Ujvari, G. Hirschl, C. Muehleisen, Outdoor detection and visualization of hailstorm damages of photovoltaic plants, Renew. Energy 118. (2018) 138–145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.010

Google Scholar

[7] S. Weber, T. Sobottka, C. Fladung, A. Koch, Outdoor electroluminescence imaging of crystalline photovoltaic modules: comparative study between manual ground-level inspections and drone-based aerial surveys, 32nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf. and Exhibition. (2016)

Google Scholar

[8] M. Vodermayer, C. Schlegel, D. & Buerhop‐Lutz, Niess, Quality Control of PV-Modules in the Field Using Infrared-Thermography, 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, p.3894–3897.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Ebner, R. Újvári, G. Kubicek, B. Zamini, Non-destructive-techniques for quality control of photovoltaic modules: electroluminescence imaging and infrared thermography, Photovolt. Int. J., PV-Tech PRO, (2012) 127–203.

DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2013.6700488

Google Scholar

[10] M. Langenkamp O. Breitenstein, Lock-in thermography- basics and l diagnostics of electronic components, Springer2003, no. ISBN 3-540-43439-9.

Google Scholar