Determination of Crack Limits in Sinter Components by Compaction Process Performance Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cracks in sinter component production are a significant concern in the field of powder metallurgy, and predicting and avoiding them is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of the final products. This study aims to contribute to this effort by investigating the variability of cracks under constant press settings by studying the performance of the compaction process. To this end, we intentionally induced cracks at different levels and studied the respective process performance. Our results show that with the same settings of the powder compaction press, 99% of the produced cracks could be found within a range of ±25% of the overall mean of the crack lengths. The lower and upper limits of crack lengths found and the approach presented for their determination can be used in future for the classification of good and bad parts on the basis of the availability of only a few crack measurements and permissible values of crack lengths that have yet to be defined.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-96

Citation:

Online since:

December 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Tahir and A. Ariffin, 'Fracture in metal powder compaction', International journal of solids and structures, vol. 43, no. 6, p.1528–1542, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.10.010

Google Scholar

[2] R. Jiang, Y. Song, and P. Reed, 'Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in powder metallurgy Ni-based superalloys—A review', International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 141, p.105887, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105887

Google Scholar

[3] E. Ganthaler, H. MoradiMaryamnegari, T. Villgrattner, and A. Peer, 'Automatic trajectory adaptation for the control of quality characteristics in a powder compaction process', Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 107, p.268–279, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.060

Google Scholar

[4] H. MoradiMaryamnegari, S.-E.-I. Hasseni, E. Ganthaler, T. Villgrattner, and A. Peer, 'Neural-network-based automatic trajectory adaptation for quality characteristics control in powder compaction', Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, p.1–21, 2023.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02274-2

Google Scholar

[5] T. H. PV Ramana, 'Process Capability (Cp & Cpk)', Six Sigma Study Guide. Accessed: May 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sixsigmastudyguide.com/process-capability-cp-cpk/

DOI: 10.1201/9780203741948-2

Google Scholar

[6] I. Zwetsloot, L. Jones-Farmer, and W. Woodall, 'Monitoring univariate processes using control charts: Some practical issues and advice', Quality Engineering, p.1–13, 2023.

DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2023.2238049

Google Scholar

[7] H. S. Yam, 'Six Sigma: A Preamble', in Six Sigma, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006, p.1–17.

DOI: 10.1002/0470062002.ch1

Google Scholar

[8] B. Zhong, Y. Wang, D. Wei, K. Zhang, and J. Wang, 'Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for powder metallurgy superalloy FGH96 based on stress gradient effect', International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 109, p.26–36, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.006

Google Scholar

[9] V. Indira, R. Vasanthakumari, R. Jegadeeshwaran, and V. Sugumaran, 'Determination of minimum sample size for fault diagnosis of automobile hydraulic brake system using power analysis', Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, p.59–69, 2015.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2014.09.007

Google Scholar

[10] N. Vivekananthamoorthy and S. Sankar, 'Lean six sigma', in Six Sigma Projects and Personal Experiences, IntechOpen, 2011.

DOI: 10.5772/17288

Google Scholar

[11] A. Radchenko, 'Mechanical properties of green compacts. II. Effect of powder relative bulk density on the strength of compacts with different forming temperature conditions', Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics, vol. 43, p.552–563, 2004.

DOI: 10.1007/s11106-005-0021-6

Google Scholar

[12] D. J. Wheeler and D. S. Chambers, 'Understanding statistical process control', Knoxville, 1992.

Google Scholar

[13] V. E. Kane, 'Process capability indices', Journal of quality technology, vol. 18, no. 1, p.41–52, 1986.

Google Scholar

[14] 'Control Chart Constants | Tables and Brief Explanation', R-BAR. Accessed: May 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://r-bar.net/control-chart-constants-tables-explanations/

Google Scholar

[15] D. Wheeler, 'Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos (2 Revised.)'. Knoxville, TN: SPC PRESS (Statistical Process Control), 2000.

Google Scholar

[16] D.C. Montgomery, Statistical quality control, vol. 7. Wiley New York, 2009.

Google Scholar

[17] D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to statistical quality control. John wiley & sons, 2019.

Google Scholar

[18] 'Xbar R Chart, control chart, subgroups', Six-Sigma-Material.com. Accessed: May 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.six-sigma-material.com/Xbar-R.html

DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-0700-0_31

Google Scholar