The Role of Anionic Surfactant to the Particle Size Reduction of Conductive PANi

Abstract:

The conductive polyaniline (PANi) with fine particles of sizes from 724 nm down to 191 nm has been successfully synthesized through chemical oxidation reaction. The synthesis of PANi was carried out in acidic media under HCl 1.5 M solution using ammonium persulphate (APS) as an oxidizing agent in the presence of anionic surfactants. Two different types of surfactant respectively Sodium Octyl Sulphate (SOS) and Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) were brought into an investigation on the effect of the surfactant chain length of C₈ and C₁₂ to the particle size formation. Such molecular chain length is responsible for the particle size growth rate. It was found that the average particle size of PANi decreased gradually by the addition of SOS and SDS surfactants with 1 % concentration each. The particle of PANi with sizes 296 nm and 191 nm was obtained as analyzed by Particle Size Analyzer (PSA). These sizes are far below 724 nm, which obtained from the same reaction but with surfactant free. Other supporting indicators showed that the pH of reaction solution was somewhat more acidic after 7 hours of reaction when the surfactant with pH value range within 0.7 – 1.4 presence. The temperature of solution increased with time following the energy released reached 30-31°C within the first 30 minutes, which was lower when compared with that of surfactant free.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1000)
• Pages: 265-271
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1000.265
• Online since: July 2020
• Authors: Mas Ayu Elita Hafizah, Ahmad Luthfi Mahar, Suparno Suparno, Andreas Andreas, Azwar Manaf*
• Keywords: Anionic Surfactant, Chemical Oxidative Reaction, Particle Size, Polyaniline

References

[1] R. Kumar, S. Singh, and B. C. Yadav, Int. Adv. Res. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2 (2016).

[2] M. Khalid, A. Maria, and B. Honorato, Polyaniline - From Synthesis to Practical Applications. (2018).

[3] S. Bhadra, D. Khastgir, N. K. Singha, and J. Hee, Prog. Polym. Sci. 34 (2009) 783–810.

[4] R. Ansari and M. B. Keivani, E-Journal Chem. 3 (2012) 202–217.

[5] J. Vivekanandan, V. Ponnusamy, A. Mahudeswaran, and P. S. Vijayanand, Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 3 (2011) 147–153.

[6] S.C.K. Misra, P. Mathur, and B.K. Srivastava, Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 114 (2004) 30–35.

[7] M.A.E. Hafizah, A. Bimantoro, Andreas, and A. Manaf, Procedia Chemistry. 19 (2016) 162-165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.088

[8] N. Karaoğlan and C. Bindal, Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J. 21 (2018) 1152–1158.

[9] L. F. Calheiros, B. G. Soares, G. M. O. Barra, and S. Livi, Mater. Chem. Phys. 179 (2016) 194-203.

[10] I.Yu. Sapurina and M.A. Shishov Additional, intech open, (2018).

[11] A. Olad, F. Ilghami, and R. Nosrati, Chem. Pap. 66 (2012) 757–764.

[12] M. Aleahmad, H. G. Taleghani, and H. Eisazadeh, Synth. Met. 161 (2011) 990–995.

[13] Q. Wen, Kai He, Chengwei Wang, Baoxiang Wang, Shoushan Yu, Chuncheng Hao and Kezheng Chen. Synth. Met. 239 (2018) 1–12.

[14] A. Manaf, Y. J. Prasutiyo, M.A.E. Hafizah, and Andreas, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. 5 (2017) 127-131.

[15] S. Aribowo, M. A. E. Hafizah, A. Manaf, and Andreas, AIP Conf. Proc. 1945 (2018).

[16] J. Stejskal and R. G. Gilbert, Pure Appl. Chem. 74 (2007) 857–867.

[17] W. Aa, Res. Rev. - J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1 (2012) 1–5.

[18] J.H. Fendler, The Colloidal Where Physics, Domain Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet. 8 (1996).

[19] Karol J. Mysels, Critical Micelle Concentrations of Aqueous Surfactant Systems. (1970).