Stress Relaxation Behavior of GH4169 Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The relaxation properties of GH4169 alloy were studied contrastively at temperatures ranging from 600 oC to 700 °C and initial stress ranging from 550 MPa to 850 MPa. The relationship between the microstructure and relaxation behavior was evaluated using transmission electron microscopy techniques. It was found that the relaxation limit and relaxation stability of the alloy decreased obviously with the increase of temperature. Further investigations show that the relaxation behavior is mainly depend on both precipitate characteristics and its interaction with dislocations. The alloy with higher strength lever has more excellent stress relaxation stability, because of the inhibition of a large number subgrains on dislocations motion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1013)

Pages:

52-58

Citation:

Online since:

October 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Coste S, Andrieu E, and Huez J 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. A396 92.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang J M, Gao Z Y, Zhuang J Y, Zhong Z Y, and Janschek P 1997 J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 70 252.

Google Scholar

[3] Azadian S, Wei L Y, and Warren R 2004 Mater. Character. 53 7.

Google Scholar

[4] Collier J P, Wong S H, Phillips J C, and Tien J K 1988 Metall. Trans. 19A 1657.

Google Scholar

[5] Sundararaman M, Mukhopadhyay P, and Banerjee S 1988 Metall. Trans. 19A 453.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Y Z, Dong J X, Zhang M C, and Yao Z H 2016 Mater. Sci. Eng. A678 10.

Google Scholar

[7] Prasad K, Sarkar R, Ghosal P, and Kumar V 2010 Mater. Design, 31 4502.

Google Scholar

[8] Kuo C M, Yang Y T, Bor H Y, Wei C N, and Tai C C 2009 Mater. Sci. Eng. A510-511 289.

Google Scholar

[9] Kim D H, Kim J H, Sa J W, Lee Y S, Park C K, and Moon S I 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 483-484 262.

Google Scholar

[10] Warren J, and Wei D Y 2006 Mater. Sci. Eng. A428 106.

Google Scholar

[11] Praveen K V U, and Singh V 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. A485 352.

Google Scholar

[12] Rahimi S, King M, and Dumont C 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng. A708 563.

Google Scholar

[13] Jiang H, Yang J, Dong J X, Zhang M C, Yao Z H, and Xie X S 2018 9th Inter. Symp. Super. 718 & Deriv. 789.

Google Scholar

[14] Jiang H, Dong J X, Zhang M C, Yao Z H, and Yang J 2019 Acta Metal. Sinica 55(9) 1211.

Google Scholar

[15] David M, Collins, Souza N D, and Panwisawas C 2017 Scripta Materialia, 131 103.

Google Scholar

[16] Lu L, Zhu T, and Shen Y F 2009 Acta Materialia, 57 5165.

Google Scholar

[17] Liu P, Zong Y Y, Shan D B, and Guo B 2015 Mater. Sci. Eng. A638 106.

Google Scholar

[18] Yang X S, Wang Y J, and Zhang T Y 2016 Acta Materialia 108 252.

Google Scholar

[19] Wang Y Z, Dong J X, Zhang M C, and Yao Z H 2016 Mater. Sci. Eng. A678 10.

Google Scholar

[20] Guo J Q, Xuan F Z, and He L 2008 Nucl. Pow. Eng. 29(6) 119.

Google Scholar

[21] Yang J, Jiang H, Yao Z H, and Dong J X 2018 Mater. Letters 221 89.

Google Scholar