Challenges in Printing Certified Additive Manufactured Material: Ensuring Process Stability and Material Quality

Abstract:

Additive manufacturing (AM) is currently one of the most promising and advanced tools to make high-end components. For industrial acceptance of these components, there is a demand for the delivery of high quality parts, certified under recognized standards. Pre-requisites for such certified parts are the certification of the powder feed-stock and the use of qualified facilities. Such a certification and qualification project encompasses different challenges regarding both powder testing and print process stability. Today there are insufficient quantitative acceptance criteria for AM metal powders in the standards. The main challenge is determining which properties to test and how to define some key indicators that can guarantee consistent quality of the end product. To face this challenge several relevant powder properties were tested in order to link powder performance to the properties of the printed material. To guarantee process stability and repeatability, a good knowledge and control of the different process parameters and their influence on the material quality is needed. Hence, an extensive study on the homogeneity of properties over the 3D printer platform was performed. A qualification testing platform was designed to guarantee and periodically check the quality of the printed AM316L material. The proper procedures and parameter settings were determined and fixed. This methodology finally lead to the qualification of the ENGIE Laborelec Powder Lab and the ENGIE Fabricom AM printing facility and the certification of AM 316L material through a recognized external qualification body. This initiative paves the way to ensure industrial acceptance of the selective laser melting process for high quality applications.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1016)
• Pages: 372-378
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1016.372
• Online since: January 2021
• Authors: Evy de Bruycker*, Céline Hautfenne, Fabien Thielemans, Steve Nardone
• Keywords: 316L, Additive Manufacturing, Certification, Powder Testing, Process Stability

References

[1] M. Yakout, M.A. Elbestawi, S.C. Veldhuis, Density and mechanical properties in selective laser melting of Invar 36 and stainless steel 316L, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 266 (2019) 397-420.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.006

[2] A. B. Spierings, T. L. Starr, and K. Wegener, Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts, Rapid Prototyp. J., 19/2 (2013) 88–94.

DOI: 10.1108/13552541311302932

[3] Y. Zhong, L. Liu, S. Wikman, D. Cui, and Z. Shen, Intragranular cellular segregation network structure strengthening 316L stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting, J. Nucl. Mater., 470 (2016) 170–178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.034

[4] I. Tolosa, F. Garciandía, F. Zubiri, F. Zapirain, A. Esnaola, Study of mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel processed by selective laser melting following different manufacturing strategies, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 51/5 (2010) 639–647.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2631-5

[5] R. Engeli, T. Etter, S. Hövel, K. Wegener, Processability of different IN738LC powder batches by selective laser melting, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 229 (2016) 484–491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.046

[6] P. Mellin, O. Lyckfeldt, P. Harlin, H. Brodin, H. Blom, A. Strondl, Evaluating flowability of additive manufacturing powders using the Gustavsson flow meter, Met. Powder Rep., 72/5 (2017) 322–326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mprp.2017.06.003

[7] M. L. Montero-Sistiaga, M. Godino-Martinez, C. Hautfenne, M. Deprez, A. Martín, M.T. Pérez-Prado, J-P Kruth, K. Vanmeensel, Fast Screening of Modified Powder Compositions for Selective Laser Melting, Euro PM18 Conference, European Powder Metallurgy Association, Bilbao, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.028

[8] A. B. Spierings, M. Voegtlin, T. Bauer, K. Wegener, Powder flowability characterisation methodology for powder-bed-based metal additive manufacturing, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 1/1-2 (2016) 9–20.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-015-0001-4