Comparative Numerical Study between /Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete and SIFCON on Beam-Column Joint Behavior

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a nonlinear finite element analysis of RC beam-column joints. A numerical study carried out through a simulation on beam-column joints failed in flexure presented by experimental study. A verification procedure was performed on two joints by finite element analysis with ANSYS APDL. The verification with the experimental work revealed a good agreement through the load-displacement relationship, ultimate load, and displacement, and crack pattern. Also, the parametric study was implemented which including strengthening the concrete members by a variable ratio of steel fibers with normal ratios (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%) and ratios of slurry infiltrated fiber concrete SIFCON (steel fibers up to 4%, 6%, and 8%) in addition to using of partial and full strengthening with and without stirrups. The test results revealed that steel fibers enhanced the flexural strength and ductility of the tested joint. Increase the ratio of steel fibers increased the flexural capacity by (101%, 153%, 177%, and 193%) for the four normal ratios of steel fibers respectively. SIFCON concrete ratios (4%, 6%m and 8%) enhanced ultimate strength by (521%, 802%, and 906%) respectively. The use of steel fibers reinforcement instead of steel rebar enhanced the ultimate load capacity by (101%) with large displacement. Full strengthening method by use of SIFCON presented pure flexural failure with cracks spread in the joint region but use the SIFCON concrete as a partial strengthening changed the failure mode to the shear failure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1021)

Pages:

138-149

Citation:

Online since:

February 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-11) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. Farmington Hills, MI 48331, pp.155-202. USA, (2011).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[2] ASCE41-13. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings: American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, Virginia, (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] A.M. Elsouri, M.H. Harajli. Seismic response of exterior RC wide beam–narrow column joints: Earthquake resistant versus as-built joints. Engineering Structures 57 (2013): 394-405.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.032

Google Scholar

[4] A. Masi, G. Santarsiero, G.P. Lignola, G.M. Verderame. Study of the seismic behavior of external RC beam-column joints through experimental tests and numerical simulations. Engineering Structures 52 (2013) 207–219.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.023

Google Scholar

[5] S. Saptarshi, K. Ramanjaneyulu, N. Balthasar, N. Lakshmanan. Analytical and experimental investigations on seismic performance of exterior beam–column sub assemblages of existing RC-framed building. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42 (2013). 1785–1805.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2298

Google Scholar

[6] A. Eslami, H.R. Ronagh, Experimental investigation of an appropriate anchorage system for flange-bonded carbon fiber–reinforced polymers in retrofitted RC beam–column Joints. ASCE J. Composites for Construction 18 (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000456

Google Scholar

[7] E. Esmaeeli, J.A.O. Barros, C. Sena, J.L. Fasan, F.R.L. Prizzi, J. Melo, H. Varum. Retrofitting of interior RC beam-column joints using CFRP strengthened SHCC: cast-in-place solution, Composite Structures. 10 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.012

Google Scholar

[8] C.D. Vecchio, M.D. Ludovico, A. Prota, G. Manfredi,. Modelling beam-column joints and FRP strengthening in the seismic performance assessment of RC existing frames. Composite Structures (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.077

Google Scholar

[9] H.S. Shwan, H. A. Razak,. Structural behavior of RC engineered cementitious composite (ECC) exterior beam–column joints under reversed cyclic loading, Construction and Building Materials. 107 (2016) 226–234.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.001

Google Scholar

[10] E. Esmaeeli, J.A.O. Barros, C.J. Sena, H. Varum, J. Melo. Assessment of the efficiency of prefabricated hybrid composite plates (HCPs) for retrofitting of damaged interior RC beam–column joints, Composite Structures 119 (2015), p.24–37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.024

Google Scholar

[11] G. Campione, L. Cavaleri, M. Papia. Flexural response of external R.C. beam–column joints externally strengthened with steel cages. Engineering Structures 104 (2015) p.51–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.009

Google Scholar

[12] M.T.D. Risi, P. Ricci, G. Verderame, M., G. Manfredi. Experimental assessment of unreinforced exterior beam–column joints with deformed bars, Engineering Structures 112 (2016) 215–232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.016

Google Scholar

[13] G. Kotsovou, H. Mouzakis. Exterior RC beam–column joints: new design approach, Engineering Structures 41 (2012) 307–319.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.049

Google Scholar

[14] S. Park, K.M. Mosalam, Experimental and analytical studies on reinforced concrete buildings with seismically vulnerable beam- column joints. PEER Report 2012/03 Pacific Earthquake Research Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Berkeley (2012).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Pauletta, D.D. Luca, G. Russo,. Exterior beam column joints shear strength model and design formula. Engineering Structures 94 (2015) p.70–81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.040

Google Scholar

[16] B.A. Muhsen, H. Umemura. New Model for Estimation of Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Interior Beam-Column Joints, Procedia Engineering 14 (2011) p.2151–2159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.270

Google Scholar

[17] S. Park, K.M. Mosalam. Parameters for shear strength prediction of exterior beam–column joints without transverse reinforcement, Engineering Structures 36 (2012) p.198–209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.017

Google Scholar

[18] C. Lima, E. Martinelli, C. Faella. Capacity models for shear strength of exterior joints in RC frames: experimental assessment and recalibration. Springer Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2012) 985–1007.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9342-2

Google Scholar

[19] H.F. Wong, J.S. Kuang. Predicting shear strength of RC interior beam–column joints by modified rotating angle softened-truss model, Computers and Structures 133 (2014), p.12–17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.11.008

Google Scholar

[20] G.L. Wang, J.G. Dai, J.G. Teng. Shear strength model for RC beam–column joints under seismic loading, Engineering Structures. 40 (2012). Pp. 350–360.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.038

Google Scholar

[21] J.S. Jeon, A. Shafieezadeh, R. DesRoches. Statistical models for shear strength of RC beam-column joints using machine-learning techniques, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 43 (2014) p.2075–(2095).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2437

Google Scholar

[22] W. Kassem. Strut-and-tie modelling for the analysis and design of RC beam-column joints, Materials and Structures 49(2016)) p.3459–3476.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-015-0732-1

Google Scholar

[23] G. Kotsovou, H. Mouzakis. Seismic design of RC external beam-column joints. Springer, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2012) p.645–677.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-011-9303-1

Google Scholar

[24] A.S. Genikomsou, M.A. Polak,. Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS. Engineering Structures 98 (2015) p.38–48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.016

Google Scholar

[25] A. Sharma, R., Eligehausen, G.R. Reddy. A new model to simulate joint shear behavior of poorly detailed beam–column connections in RC structures under seismic loads, Part I: Exterior joints, Engineering Structures 33 (2011), p.1034–1051.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.026

Google Scholar

[26] J. Shayanfar, A.H. Bengar, A. Niroomandi. A proposed model for predicting nonlinear behaviour of RC joints under seismic loads. Materials and Design. 95 (2016) p.563–579.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.098

Google Scholar

[27] Wosatko, A., Pamin, J., Polak M.A. (2015). Application of damage-plasticity models in finite element analysis of punching shear, Computers and structures 151: 73–85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.01.008

Google Scholar

[28] Niroomandi, A., Najafgholipour, M.A., Ronagh, H.R. (2014). Numerical investigation of the affecting parameters on the shear failure of Non-ductile RC exterior joints, Engineering Failure Analysis 46: 62-75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.08.003

Google Scholar

[29] A.S. Shakir, Q.J. Frayyeh, and M.A.A. Ali. Flexural behavior of slurry infiltrated fiber concrete (sifcon) containing supplementary cementitious materials, Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. 22 (2018).

DOI: 10.31272/jeasd.2018.2.32

Google Scholar

[30] R. Giridhar, Rama P. and Rao M. Determination of mechanical properties of slurry infiltrated concrete (SIFCON),, International Journal for Technological Research in Engineering 2 (2015) pp.1366-1368.

Google Scholar

[31] E.r.B. Ravindra, and R. Sundara,. Slurry infiltrated fibrous reinforced concrete (SIFCON). DOC, (2010).

Google Scholar

[32] Y. Mert, A. Serdar, Y. Hüseyin, Y. Halit. Improvement of Self-Compacting Cement Slurry for Autoclaved SIFCON Containing High Volume Class C Fly Ash. Dokuz Eylul University Engineering Faculty Department of Civil Engineering, Buca – İzmir, Turkey, (2010) pp.1-33.

DOI: 10.3311/ppci.8498

Google Scholar

[33] I.I.R. Montava, J.C. Pomares, and A. Gnozalez. Experimental study of steel reinforced Concrete (SRC) Joints. Applied sciences, MDPI (2017).

DOI: 10.3390/app9081528

Google Scholar

[34] D. Kachlakev, T. Miller, S. Yim, K. Chansawat, and T. Potisuk. American Society for Testing and Materials. Report SPR 316 (California Polytechnic State University, San Luis. Obispo, CA and Oregon State University, Corvallis OR for Oregon Department of Transportation) (2001).

DOI: 10.31979/mti.2023.2153

Google Scholar

[35] L.S. Hsu, and C.T.T., Hsu, Complete Stress-Strain Behaviour of High-Strength Concrete under Compression,, Magazine of Concrete Research (ASCE Journal), Vol.46, No.169, (1994) pp.301-312.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1994.46.169.301

Google Scholar

[36] A.S. Ali, and Z. Riyadh. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Effects of Size and type of Steel Fibers on the (SIFCON) Concrete Specimens. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13 (2018) pp.1344-1353.

Google Scholar

[37] S. Salih, Q. Frayyeh, and M. Ali. Fresh and some mechanical properties of SIFCON containing silica fume", MATEC Web of Conferences 162 (2018).

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201816202003

Google Scholar

[38] I. Montava, R. Irles, J.C. Pomares, J. Sequra, J.M. Gadea, and E. Juliá. Numerical simulation of steel reinforced concrete (SRC) joints. Metals, MDPI (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/met9020131

Google Scholar