Assessment of Recycled Toilet Bowl Wastes as Pozzolanic Materials: Material Characterization and Performance of Mortar Mixtures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing demand for finding alternative applications for ceramic products wastes develops their usage as construction materials. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of recycled toilet bowl (RTB) wastes as pozzolanic materials in mortar mixture. The properties of RTB material were examined in terms of chemical composition, particle size distribution (PSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, compressive strength, pozzolanic reactivity, sulfate resistance, and alkali-silica reaction according to ASTM C 618 and C 311 test specifications. The results demonstrated that the use of RTB materials as pozzolanic materials positively affects compressive strength development and durability by fully corresponding to all criteria of the ASTM C 618 guideline. Furthermore, chemical composition, PSD, and XRD test results had equivalent values to ASTM class F fly ash analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1023)

Pages:

135-140

Citation:

Online since:

March 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lavat, A.E., Trezza, M.A., Poggi, M. (2009). Characterization of ceramic roof tile wastes as pozzolanic admixture. Waste Management, 29 (5), 1666–1674.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.10.019

Google Scholar

[2] Vieira, T., Alves, A., de Brito, J., Correia, J.R., Silva, R.V. (2016). Durability-related performance of concrete containing fine recycled aggregates from crushed bricks and sanitary ware. Materials Design, 90, 767–776.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.023

Google Scholar

[3] Reig, Lucía, M.V. Borrachero, J.M. Monzó, Holmer Savastano, Mauro M. Tashima, and J. Payá. (2015). Use of ceramic sanitaryware as an alternative for the development of new sustainable binders. Key Engineering Materials, 668, 172–180.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.668.172

Google Scholar

[4] Zimbili, O., Salim, W., & Ndambuki M. (2014). A review on the usage of ceramic wastes in concrete production. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 8(1), 91–95.

Google Scholar

[5] Halicka, A., Ogrodnik, P., Zegardlo, B. (2013). Using ceramic sanitary ware waste as concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 295–305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.063

Google Scholar

[6] Mohammadhosseini, H., Lim, N.H.A.S., Tahir, M.M., Alyousef, R., Samadi, M., Alabduljabbar, H., Mohamed, A.M. (2020). Effects of waste ceramic as cement and fine aggregate on durability performance of sustainable mortar. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45, 3623–3634.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-04198-7

Google Scholar

[7] Batayneh, M., Marie, I., Asi, I. (2007). Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes, Waste Management, 27 (12), 1870–1876.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.026

Google Scholar

[8] Manning, D.A.C. Industrial clays: kaolin (china clay), ball clay and bentonite. In: Introduction to Industrial Minerals. Springer, Dordrecht, (1995).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1242-0_3

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM C188-17, Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2017).

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM C109 / C109M-16, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-20

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM C1012 / C1012M-18, Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2018).

DOI: 10.1520/c1012_c1012m-18

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM C1260-14, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2014).

DOI: 10.1520/c1260-01

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM C618-19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2019).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-12a

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C311 / C311M-18, Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2018).

DOI: 10.1520/c0311-00

Google Scholar

[15] Bui, P.T., Ogawa, Y., Kawai, K. (2018). Long-term pozzolanic reaction of fly ash in hardened cement-based paste internally activated by natural injection of saturated Ca(OH)2 solution. Materials and Structures, 51, 144.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-018-1274-0

Google Scholar

[16] Bektimirova, U., Shon, C.-S., Zhang, D., Sharafutdinov, E., Kim, J.R. (2018). Proportioning and characterization of reactive powder concrete for an energy storage pile application. Applied Sciences, 8, 2507.

DOI: 10.3390/app8122507

Google Scholar

[17] Shon, C.-S., Kim, Y.-S. (2013). Evaluation of west Texas natural zeolite as an alternative of ASTM class F fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 389–396.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.041

Google Scholar