Development of Characteristics and Thermal Properties of Ash Celadon Glazes in Thailand

Abstract:

In this paper, we will study the development and comparison of characteristics and thermal properties of original celadon glazes and celadon glazes developed by adding black rice husk ash, Using Mae Rim black clay in Chiang Mai Province as raw material for the original celadon glaze (CG), including clay in the rice paddies, Kha wood ash and mixed wood ash. The raw materials for the development of celadon glazes formula were 14BR, 15BR, 20BR, 21BR, 27BR and 28BR, respectively. Using a triangular phase diagram system, Mae Taeng clay (MT), Kha wood ash (KWA) and black rice husk ash (BR) were used in the ratios of 40, 50, 60 and 70 wt.%, and using the red clay from Doi Saket, Chiang Mai as a coloring agent. Subsequently, the raw materials are ground and mixed to form a coating. Coated onto Mae Rim black clay test specimens. and fire the test specimen at 1250 °C in a reducing atmosphere. After that, the characteristics of the glazes after firing were tested, including crack, melt, flow, color appearance, and chemical composition. Thermal properties tests include the coefficient of thermal expansion and thermal shock resistance in temperature. The results showed that by comparing the original formula celadon glazes (CG) with the celadon glazes formula developed by adding black rice husk ash. crazing were reduced when adding more black rice husk ash. All formulations were melted at 1250 °C due to their CaO content of 55.0, 47.6, 41.0, 51.0, 47.9, 47.7 and 43.0 % respectively. From the chemical composition analysis with XRF, celadon glazes after firing in all formulas did not see any flow due to the content of SiO₂ being 28.0, 28.8, 35.4, 26.7, 28.3, 27.9 and 31.1% respectively. The appearance of glazes after firing was more greenish-yellow when rice husk ash was added when using a color analyzer. Because the amount of Fe₂O₃ up to 4.6, 9.3, 10.4, 8.2, 9.1, 5.9 and 6.0% respectively from Mae Taeng clay and Doi Saket clay. The chemical composition of celadon glaze consists of CaO as the main component, followed by SiO₂ and Fe₂O₃. The important thing is the chemical composition of the glazes was not found with lead and cadmium. The thermal expansion coefficient of celadon glazes at 25-1250°C decreased when adding more black rice husk ash. Finally, the percentage of strength loss after thermal shock temperature change was CG ˃ 20BR ˃ 21BR ˃ 27BR ˃ 28BR ˃ 14BR ˃ 15BR, respectively, using the Celadon Pottery Community Standards Test. (MorChor. 245/2013).

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1059)
• Pages: 137-141
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-1svqd5
• Online since: April 2022
• Authors: Nophawan Dechboon*
• Keywords: Ash, Celadon, Characteristics, Glazes, Thermal Properties

References

[1] Archeology Division, Lanna Tao Site, Bangkok, Fine Arts Department, 1990, 15.

[2] Fine Arts Department, San Kamphaeng Ceramics and Kiln, 1972, 3-10.

[3] Information on http://www.thaiceramicsociety.com.

[4] P. Ingsiriwat, A collection of ceramic coating formulas, Bangkok, Odeon Store Publishing House, (1994).

[5] H. Norsker, J. Danisch, Glaze-for the Self-Reliant Potter, (1993).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-06865-5_13

[6] P.F. Becher, D.L. Jil, K.R. Carman, A.C. Gonzalez, Thermal Shock Resistance of Ceramics: Size and geometry effects in quench tests, Journal of American Ceramics Socity, 59 (1980) 542-548.

[7] H. El-Didamony, E. El-Fadaly, A. Amer, I.H. Abazee, Synthesis and characterization of low costnanosilica from sodium silicate solution and theirapplications in ceramic engobes, Ceramica y Vidrio, 59 (2020) 31-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bsecv.2019.06.004

[8] E. Charles, Refractories Handbook, Japan, The technical association of refractories. (1998).

[9] W. Ryan, C. Radford, Whitewares: Production, Testing and Quality Control, London, Institute of materials, (1997).

[10] Z. Tiequan, H. Hong, W. Hongmin, H. Limin, Y. Xibin, Comparison of celadon from the Yaozhou and Xicun kilns in the Northern Song Dynasty of China by X-ray fluorescence and microscopy, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38 (2011) 3134-3140.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.017