Paper Titles
Influence and Modeling of Loading Frequency on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Thermally-Aging HTPB Coating
p.155
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Graphene Heating Film
p.161
Properties of Modified Nano Black Carbon and Its Effects on Soil Enzyme Activities
p.169
Fabrication of C-Doped TiO2 Nanosphere for BTEX Degradation of Paint Thinners with Visible Light Irradiation
p.177
Sustainable Concrete with Coconut Fibers to Improve its Mechanical Characteristics in Buildings
p.187
Mechanical Behavior of Low Plasticity Clay Soil Stabilized with Rice Husk Ash
p.195
Self-Sensing Capabilities of Cement Pastes Treated by Direct Current Curing Technique
p.201
Strength Development of LC3 Concrete Containing Grade 100 Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag (GGBFS)
p.207
Settlement Comparison Research in Response to Gravel Columns with Concrete under a Distributed Vertical Dynamic Load
p.213

Strength Development of LC3 Concrete Containing Grade 100 Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag (GGBFS)

Article Preview

Abstract:

To decrease greenhouse gas emissions and maintain sustainable economic growth, the cement industry has developed limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Many researchers have started to investigate the performance of LC3 as a construction material. However, the strength development of LC3 has diverging or opposite views. In this research, the strength development characteristics of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and LC3 with different combinations of medium reactive ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) have been compared using compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity, and maturity tests. The test result shows that the LC3 concrete has a similar 28-day compressive strength to OPC concrete despite developing a lower early age. Ultrasonic pulse velocity test results have matched compressive strength test results. The predicted compressive strengths using 7-day maturity data were comparable to actual strength results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Composite Materials and Advanced Materials Research View Preview
Modern Materials and Processing Technologies View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1060)

Pages:

207-212

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-u0p4wx

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2022

Authors:

Islam Orynbassarov, Aizhan Kissambinova, Saken Sandybay, Ayazhan Bazarbekova, Daniyar Syzdykov, Zhamilya Mamesh, Chang Seon Shon*

Keywords:

Compressive Strength, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Limestone Calcined Clay Cement, Maturity, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] A. M. Ramezanianpour (2012). Sulfate Resistance and Properties of Portland - Limestone Cements, Univ. Toronto, p.185.

Google Scholar

[2] Q.D. Nguyen, S. Afroz, and A. Castel (2020). Influence of Calcined Clay Reactivity on the Mechanical Properties and Chloride Diffusion Resistance of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) Concrete, J. Mar.Sc. Eng., Vol. 8: 301, p.1–14.

DOI: 10.3390/jmse8050301

Google Scholar

[3] J. Farfan, M. Fasihi, and C. Breyer (2019). Trends in the global cement industry and opportunities for long-term sustainable CCU potential for Power-to-X, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 217, p.821–835, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.226

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. Sharp, E. M. Gartner, and D. E. Macphee (2010). Novel cement systems (sustainability). Session 2 of the fred glasser cement science symposium, Adv. Cem. Res., vol. 22, no. 4, p.195–202.

DOI: 10.1680/adcr.2010.22.4.195

Google Scholar

[5] D. L. Summerbell, C. Y. Barlow, and J. M. Cullen (2016). Potential reduction of carbon emissions by performance improvement: A cement industry case study, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 135, p.1327–1339.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.155

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Xie, X. Tang, and G. Long (2011). Experiment on cement-based materials with various compositions against sulfate attack, Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 168–170, p.94–98.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.168-170.94

Google Scholar

[7] H. Maraghechi, F. Avet, H. Wong, H. Kamyab, and K. Scrivener (2018). Performance of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) with various kaolinite contents with respect to chloride transport, Mat. Str., vol. 95: 125, p.1–17.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-018-1255-3

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Dhandapani, T. Sakthivel, M. Santhanam, R. Gettu, and R. G. Pillai (2018). Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3)," Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 107, no. July 2017, p.136–151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005

Google Scholar