Identification of Specific DNA Fragments in the Superior Mutant Plant of Rodent Tuber Accession Pekalongan (Typhonium flagelliforme) Based on Sequencing Analysis

Abstract:

Cancer is a large group of diseases that occur in almost any organ or tissue of the body when abnormal cells get out of normal and invade adjacent cells. In women especially, breast cancer is among the most common types of cancer. These cancer cells will form a tumor that can be seen on an x-ray. Some traditional breast cancer treatments have been carried out, including using local herbal plants such as rodent tubers (Typhonium flagelliforme). Rodent tuber contains stigmasterol which has a high anticancer effect and was found in several mutant clones. The purpose of this study was to analyze DNA differences between mutant and wild-type rodent tuber plants based on specific RAPD markers and sequence differences in each sample. The RAPD OPB18 primer was successfully amplifies polymorphic DNA bands with sizes ranging from 700 to 1000 bp. As a result of the sequencing analysis, separate segments in wild-type and mutant plants had different sequences. In comparing the test sequence to the NCBI database, it was found that wild-type rodent tuber samples matched Gossypium raimondii (81.82%) and BLAC (bulk highest anticancer compound) rodent tuber mutant plants has similarity with Slanum pinnasectum about 87.36%. Based on this results, the similarity of rodent tuber sequences is possible to be developed in the specific sequences that encode a gene, especially genes encoding anticancer compounds.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1069)
• Pages: 231-238
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-78ru0f
• Online since: August 2022
• Authors: Nesti Fronika Sianipar*, Reflinur Reflinur, Muhammad Dzulkifly Ashan, Khoirunnisa Assidqi, Ragapadmi Purnamaningsih
• Keywords: NCBI, RAPD Molecular Markers, Rodent Tuber Mutant Plant, Sequencing

References

[1] N.A.F. Aboul-Maaty, H.A.S. Oraby, Extraction of high-quality genomic DNA from different plant orders applying a modified CTAB-based method, Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 43 (2019) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0066-1.

DOI: 10.1186/s42269-019-0066-1

[2] R. Agarwala, T. Barrett, J. Beck, D.A. Benson, C. Bollin, E. Bolton, D. Bourexis, J.R. Brister, S.H. Bryant, K. Canese, C. Charowhas, K. Clark, M. Dicuccio, I. Dondoshansky, S. Federhen, M. Feolo, K. Funk, L.Y. Geer, V. Gorelenkov, K. Zbicz, Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research. 44 (2016) D7–D19 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1290.

DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1290

[3] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamanigsih, I. Darwati, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia Plant Variety Protection No. 00490/PPVT/S/2020 (19 March 2020).

[4] M. Khan, Y.B. Pan, & J. Iqbal, Development of an RAPD-based SCAR marker for smut disease resistance in commercial sugarcane cultivars of Pakistan. Crop Protection. 94 (2017) 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.024

[5] N.S. Kumar, G. Gurusubramanian, Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and its applications Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and its applications. Mipograss. 11 (2016) 116–124.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001010

[6] A. Lichota, & K. Gwozdzinski, Anticancer activity of natural compounds from plant and marine environment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19 (2016) 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113533.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113533

[7] N. Mohammad, S. Mahesh, Y.K. Jain, S.A. Ansari, Effect of discrete (Individual) and mixed (bulk) genomic DNA on genetic diversity estimates and population structure in Teak (Tectona grandis L.). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 55 (2017) 44–48.

[8] Q. Mohammad, I. Haq, T. Hussain, A. Kumar, N. Delhi, U. Pradesh, Molecular markers : A tool to identify hidden science with especial emphasis on agricultural crops. International Journal of Biology Research. 1 (2016) 50–59.

[9] C.S. Pareek, R. Smoczynski, A. Tretyn, Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing. Journal of Applied Genetics. 52 (2011) 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-011-0057-x.

DOI: 10.1007/s13353-011-0057-x

[10] E. Blanco, J.F. Abril. Computational gene annotation in new genome assemblies using GeneID, in: D. Posada, (eds) Bioinformatics for DNA sequence analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana Press, 537, 2009, pp.243-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_12.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_12

[11] S. Priya, P. Anjana, S. Major, Identification of the RAPD Marker linked to Powdery Mildew Resistant Gene(s) in Black Gram by using Bulk Segregant Analysis. Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (2013) 9–15.

[12] C. Sansom, Database searching with DNA and protein sequences: an introduction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 1 (2000) 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/1.1.22.

DOI: 10.1093/bib/1.1.22

[13] N.F. Sianipar, Y.E. Hadisaputri, K. Assidqi, P. Simanjuntak, R. Purnamaningsih, A study of anticancer activity from the fractions of rodent tuber superior mutant extract (Typhonium flagelliforme) by prestoblue assay method. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry. 13 (2020) 1992–1998. https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2020.1335703.

DOI: 10.31788/rjc.2020.1335703

[14] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, R., D.L. Gumanti, Rosaria, M. Vidianty, Analysis of gamma irradiated-third generation mutants of rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme lodd.) based on morphology, RAPD, and GC-MS Markers. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 40 (2017). 185–202.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.8636

[15] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, Rosaria. Bioactive compounds of fourth generation gamma-irradiated Typhoniumflagelliforme Lodd. mutants based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 41 (2016) 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/41/1/012025.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/41/1/012025

[16] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, I. Darwati, D. Laurent, The effects of gamma irradiation and somaclonal variation on morphology variation of mutant rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) lines. KnE Life Sciences. 2 (2015) 637-645. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v2i1.236.

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v2i1.236

[17] N.F. Sianipar, K. Assidqi, B.S. Abbas, The Effects of Subculture on the Mutant Plant Regeneration of Rodent Tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) in vitro Mutagenesis Using Gamma-Ray Irradiation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 426 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012180.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012180

[18] N.F. Sianipar, K. Assidqi, R. Purnamaningsih, T. Herlina, In vitro Cytotoxic Activity of Rodent Tuber Mutant Plant (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) Against to MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cell Line. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 12 (2019) 185–189. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i3.29651.

DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i3.29651

[19] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, Enhancement of the contents of anticancer bioactive compounds in mutant clones of rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) based on GC-MS analysis. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 41 (2018) 305–320.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v80.11451

[20] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, Molecular detection of putative mutant clones of rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme Lodd.) CV. pekalongan using rapd markers. Malaysian Applied Biology. 47 (2018) 1–8.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v81.12818

[21] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, K. Assidqi, H.L.H Spits Warnars, Genetic variation of somaclonal mutants from the 8th generation of Pekalongan accession rodent tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme lodd.) based on RAPD-PCR analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 195 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/195/1/012054.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/195/1/012054

[22] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, I. Darwati, D. Laurent, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of phytochemicals of first generation gamma-irradiated typhonium flagelliforme lodd. Mutants. Jurnal Teknologi. 78 (2016) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9883.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.9883

[23] N.F. Sianipar, R. Purnamaningsih, D.L. Gumanti, Rosaria, M. Vidianty, Analysis of gamma irradiated fourth generation mutant of rodent tuber (typhonium flagelliforme lodd.) Based on morphology and rapd markers. Jurnal Teknologi. 78 (2016). 41–49. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8636.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.8636

[24] X. Xia, Bioinformatics and the cell: Modern computational approaches in genomics, proteomics and transcriptomics, Second edition. In Bioinformatics and the Cell: Modern Computational Approaches in Genomics, Proteomics and Transcriptomics, Second Edition, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90684-3.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90684-3

[25] H. Zhang, Overview of sequence data formats. In Methods in Molecular Biology. 1418 (2016). 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_1 J.J. Fu, M.A. Khan, Z.Q. Mei, M. Tania, L.Q. Yang, J.L. Cheng, Development of RAPD-SCAR markers for different Ganoderma species authentication by improved RAPD amplification and molecular cloning. Genetics and Molecular Research. 14 (2015). 5667–5676. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.May.25.19 P.J. Larkin, W.R. Scocroft, Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 60 (1981). 197–214. R. Purnamaningsih & N.F. Sianipar, Analysis of Bioactive Compounds and Morphological Traits in Indonesian Rodent Tuber Mutant Clones of Pekalongan Accession Using GC-MS. Jurnal Teknologi, 80 (2018). 131-136. van Harten, A. M. Mutation Breeding. Theory and Practical Applications. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. 1998, p.353.

[26] .