Investigation on Layer Thickness on Mechanical Properties and Dimension Accuracy in Fused Deposition Modelling 3D Printing

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the current era of additive manufacturing, Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) method of printing is being studied extensively to print a concept model. Therefore, the dimensional accuracy and the mechanical properties of the FDM 3D printed part are very important. In this study, the tensile specimens are prepared according to ASTM D638 Type I. Dimensions of the specimen is measured in the x-direction (length), y-direction (width), and z-direction (height) and is compared against the standard measurement for accuracy. Tensile stress, strain at break and Young’s modulus were also investigated. Overall, the dimension accuracy achieved is more than 98%. The highest accuracy is obtained by using 0.2mm layer thickness and 0.2mm initial layer thickness. The tensile stress, Young’s modulus and strain at break are found to decrease when the layer thickness is increased. This is due having more layer with lesser and smaller voids which increases the strength and stiffness. Increasing initial layer thickness, however, has a low influence on the tensile stress but can greatly affect the Young’s modulus.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1118)

Pages:

99-104

Citation:

Online since:

March 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Syrlybayev, B. Zharylkassyn, A. Seisekulova, M. Akhmetov, A. Perveen, and D. Talamona: Polymers Vol. 13 (2021), p.1587

DOI: 10.3390/polym13101587

Google Scholar

[2] R. Mendricky and D Fris: Technical Gazette Vol 27 (2020), p.1166

Google Scholar

[3] R.D. Bintara, D.Z. Lubis, and Y.R.A. Pradana: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 1034 (2021), p.012096

Google Scholar

[4] M.M. Hanon, R. Marczis, and L. Zsidai: Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering Vol. 65 (2020), p.38

Google Scholar

[5] O.A. Mohamed and S.H. Masood: Rapid Prototyping Journal Vol. 23 (2017), p.736

Google Scholar

[6] S.R. Rajpurohit and H.K. Dave: Rapid Prototyping Journal Vol. 24 (2018), p.1317

Google Scholar

[7] M.S. Chaudhry and A. Czekanski: Materials Vol. 13 (2020), p.3202

Google Scholar

[8] K. Tiwari and S. Kumar: Materials Today: Proceedings Vol. 5 (2018), p.18674

Google Scholar

[9] N.V. Du, T.T. Xiem, P.S. Minh and N.T. Hunyh: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 861 (2020), p.182

Google Scholar

[10] D. Popescu, A. Zapciu, C. Amza, F. Baciu and R. Marinescu: Polymer Testing Vol. 69 (2018), p.157

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020

Google Scholar

[11] Rodriguez-Panes, J. Claver and A. M. Camacho: Materials Vol 11 (2018), p.1333

Google Scholar