Comparison of Static and Dynamic Mechanical Response of Aluminum 6061 Subjected to Multi-Directional Forging

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present investigation focuses on the implementation of the multi-axial forging process, recognized as a severe plastic deformation (SPD) technique, with the aim of elevating the mechanical features of the widely employed Al 6061 alloy. Specifically utilized in the automotive and aviation industries, this alloy's behavior was meticulously examined through a series of quasi-static and dynamic tests. To achieve this objective, the multi-directional forging (MDF) process was implemented for up to three cycles, involving a total of nine passes, at a raised temperature of 200 °C. Subsequently, the severely deformed material underwent utilizing high strain rate loading for the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test system. After MDF, the grain size is refined down to below 11 microns with a starting grain size of 13 microns. This is reflected as increased hardness and yield strength in the quasi-static regime. For SHPB characterization, increased dynamic strength is also observed. However, although the yield strength showed about 60% increase with decent ductility, the maximum dynamic strength increased about 10% after SPD with a relatively brittle behavior.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1120)

Pages:

21-28

Citation:

Online since:

April 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yolcular Karaoğlu, S., Karaoğlu, S. & Ünal, İ. (2021). Aerospace Industry and Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, 02 (02), 73-81.

DOI: 10.23890/ijast.vm02is02.0204

Google Scholar

[2] Aynalem, G.F., 2020, Processing Methods and Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Matrix Composites, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020.

Google Scholar

[3] Pc, Sharath & Udupa, K. & G V, Preetham Kumar. (2016). Effect of Multi Directional Forging on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Zn-24 wt% Al-2 wt% Cu Alloy. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 70.

DOI: 10.1007/s12666-016-0863-2

Google Scholar

[4] Xu, Z.-c., Guo, X.-f., Yang, W.-p., Cui, H.-b. and Wang, Y., Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Processed with Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) and Multi-Axial Compression (MAC), Materials Transactions, 2019, Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 2319-2327, Released on J-STAGE October 25, 2019, Online ISSN 1347-5320, Print ISSN 1345-9678

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mt-m2019170

Google Scholar

[5] Karaman I, Yapici GG, Chumlyakov YI, Kireeva I V. Deformation twinning in difficult-to-work alloys during severe plastic deformation. Materials Science and Engineering A 2005;410–411:243–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.021

Google Scholar

[6] Jawad, Dhyai & Hosseinzadeh, Ali & Yapici, Guney. (2019). On the mechanical behavior of accumulative roll bonded lightweight composite. Materials Research Express. 6.

DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab2d93

Google Scholar

[7] Tahir, F., & Yapici, G. G. (2021). Manufacturing and Mechanical Behavior of Titanium-Steel Composite by Accumulative Roll Bonding. Key Engineering Materials, 882, 89–95

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.882.89

Google Scholar

[8] Guler, Z., Yapici, G.G. Application of Novel Constrained Groove Pressing Routes on Austenitic Stainless Steel. Trans Indian Inst Met 74, 2599–2608 (2021)

DOI: 10.1007/s12666-021-02333-3

Google Scholar

[9] Valiev, R.Z., Langdon, T.G., Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement, Progress in Materials Science, Volume 51, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 881-981, ISSN 0079-6425.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003

Google Scholar

[10] Saito, Y., Tsuji, N., Utsunomiya, H., Sakai, T. and Hong, R.G., Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminum produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process, Scripta Materialia, Volume 39, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1221-1227, ISSN 1359-6462.

DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-9

Google Scholar

[11] Zhu, Q.-f., Li, L., Ban, C.-y., Zhao, Z.-h., Zuo, Y.-b. and Cui, J.-z., Structure uniformity and limits of grain refinement of high purity aluminum during multidirectional forging process at room temperature, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 24,5 (2014) 1301-1306.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(14)63192-7

Google Scholar

[12] Aoba, T., Kobayashi, M. and Miura, H., Microstructural Evolution and Enhanced Mechanical Properties by Multi-Directional Forging and Aging of 6000 Series Aluminum Alloy, Materials Transactions, 59,3 (2018) 373-379.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.l-m2017856

Google Scholar

[13] Renkó, József & Krallics, Gyorgy. (2020). Comparison of physical and virtual simulation of multi-axial forging processes on EN-AW 6082 aluminium alloy. Materials Today: Proceedings.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.329

Google Scholar

[14] Kim, Y.-B.; Kim, J. Influence of Specimen Thickness on the Acquisition of Al6061-T6 Material Properties Using SHPB and Verified by FEM. Materials 2021, 14, 205

DOI: 10.3390/ma14010205

Google Scholar

[15] C. Sun, X. Chen, H. Li, Y. Zhen, J. Zhang, Dynamic and quasi-static compressive properties of modified double-base propellant at low temperature, Editor(s): Lin Ye, Recent Advances in Structural Integrity Analysis - Proceedings of the International Congress (APCF/SIF-2014), Woodhead Publishing, 2014, Pages 417-421, ISBN 9780081002032.

DOI: 10.1533/9780081002254.417

Google Scholar

[16] L.D. Bertholf, C.H. Karnes, Two-dimensional analysis of the split hopkinson pressure bar system, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Volume 23, Issue 1, 1975, Pages 1-19, ISSN 0022-5096.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90008-3

Google Scholar

[17] Cherukuri, B., Nedkova, T.S. and Srinivasan, R., A comparison of the properties of SPD-processed AA-6061 by equal-channel angular pressing, multi-axial compressions/forgings and accumulative roll bonding, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 410-411 (2005) 394-397.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.024

Google Scholar

[18] Liu, W.C., Chen, M.B. and Yuan, H., Evolution of microstructures in severely deformed AA 3104 aluminum alloy by multiple constrained compression, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 528,16-17 (2011) 5405-541

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.100

Google Scholar

[19] Rokni, M.R., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., Roostaei, A.A. and Abedi, H.R., An investigation into the hot deformation characteristics of 7075 aluminum alloy, Materials & Design, 32,4 (2011) 2339-2344.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.047

Google Scholar

[20] Sitdikov, O., Sakai, T., Goloborodko, A., Miura, H. and Kaibyshev, R., Effect of Pass Strain on Grain Refinement in 7475 Al Alloy during Hot Multidirectional Forging, Materials Transactions, 45,7 (2004) 2232-2238.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.45.2232

Google Scholar

[21] Kapoor, R., Sarkar, A., Yogi, R., Shekhawat, S.K., Samajdar, I. and Chakravartty, J.K., Softening of Al during multi-axial forging in a channel die, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 560, 404-412, 2013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.085

Google Scholar

[22] K. Shojaei, S.V. Sajadifar, G.G. Yapici, On the mechanical behavior of cold deformed aluminum 7075 alloy at elevated temperatures, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 670, 2016, Pages 81-89, ISSN 0921-5093.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.113

Google Scholar

[23] Dhyai Hassan Jawad, Ali Hosseinzadeh, Guney Guven Yapici, Effect of layer architecture on the mechanical behavior of accumulative roll bonded interstitial free steel/aluminum composites, Materials Science and Engineering: A,Volume 818, 2021, 141387, ISSN 0921-5093.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141387

Google Scholar

[24] Xinran Xiao, Dynamic tensile testing of plastic materials, Polymer Testing, Volume 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 164-178, ISSN 0142-9418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting. 2007.09.010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.010

Google Scholar