Enhancing Copper-Graphene Composites for Sustainable Industry Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Graphene known as a groundbreaking nanomaterial for its outstanding mechanical strength, superior thermal conductivity, and excellent electrical properties, has gained recognition as an innovative additive for enhancing metal matrix composites. However, challenges such as agglomeration, uneven dispersion, and porosity limit its widespread application. This study aims to investigate the effects of varying graphene concentrations (0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) on the microstructural, mechanical, and thermal properties of copper-graphene composites fabricated using the powder injection molding (PIM) method. The samples underwent systematic preparation and were analyzed through hardness and tensile testing, along with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for microstructural evaluation. Results revealed that incorporating 0.5% graphene significantly enhanced tensile strength (205.22 MPa), hardness (94.2 HRL), and thermal conductivity due to uniform dispersion, efficient load transfer, and reduced porosity. However, increasing graphene content to 1.0% and 1.5% led to agglomeration, increased porosity, and disrupted microstructures, resulting in reduced mechanical and thermal performance. SEM images corroborated these findings, showing a progression from smooth, well-bonded structures at 0.5% graphene to irregular, void-filled morphologies at higher concentrations, making it suitable for applications requiring efficient heat dissipation and mechanical reinforcement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1150)

Pages:

9-14

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.M. Salleh and A.I. Hassan. Sustainability Vol. 15(14) (2023), 10891.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Amano and S. Agnello. Journal of Carbon Research Vol. 5(4) (2019), 67.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Trache, V.K. Thakur and R. Boukherroub. Nanomaterials Vol. 10(8) (2020), 1523.

Google Scholar

[4] W. Liu, Y. Han, J. Zhang and C. Zhang. Applied Sciences Vol. 14(20) (2024), 9273.

Google Scholar

[5] W.A. Shah, X. Luo, and Y.Q. Yang. Ceramics International Vol. 49(5) (2023), pp.7987-7995.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Broniszewski, J. Wozniak and T. Cygan. Nanomaterials Vol. 14(6) (2024), 555.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Ding, Z. Liu, D. Zhou, and C. Chi. Carbon Vol. 230 (2024), 119640.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Arumugam, A. Gora, and V. Lipik. Textiles Vol. 4(4) (2024), pp.442-458.

Google Scholar

[9] Q. Zhou, M. Shi, M. Wu, and N. Zhao. Catalysts Vol. 14(1) (2024), 8.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Mandal, J.K. Tiwari, and B. Almangour. Results in Materials Vol. 11 (2021), 100200

Google Scholar

[11] D. Wijerathne, Y. Gong, and S. Afroj. Int. Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Vol. 6(1) (2023), pp.117-128.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Li, C. Zhang, and Y.F. Zhang. Polymers Vol. 9(9) (2017), 437.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Shao, P. Liu, and K. Zhang. Materials Science and Engineering: A Vol. 739 (2019), pp.329-334.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Liu, B. Li, and W. Zhang. Coatings Vol. 14(7) (2024), 803.

Google Scholar

[15] B.L. Dasari, M. Morshed, J.M. Nouri, and D. Brabazan. Composites Part B: Engineering Vol. 145 (2018), pp.136-144.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Zhang, W. Zhang, and X. Yu. Metals Vol. 14(10) (2024), 1105.

Google Scholar

[17] P. Govindaraj, A. Sokolova, and N. Salim. Composites Part B: Engineering Vol. 226 (2021), 109353.

Google Scholar

[18] T. Shahnaz, G. Hayder, and M.A. Shah. Journal of Materials Research and Technology Vol. 28 (2024), pp.2671-2698.

Google Scholar