Effect of a Low Corn Silk Flour Loading in Polybutylene Succinate Biocomposites on Degradability under Soil Burial and Sunlight Exposure Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polybutylene succinate (PBS) is a biodegradable polymer made from renewable resources and is therefore better suited for disposable products than recycled products. Nevertheless, PBS cannot be degraded in a timely manner (less than 180 days) to be claimed to be a compostable bioplastic. Corn silk is an agricultural waste material that degrades easily in the natural environment due to its small fibers. Therefore, this research aimed to study the degradability of PBS composites filled with corn silk flour (CSF) in small amounts of 5-15 phr and compared them with neat PBS by considering changes in mechanical properties. Corn silk was ground and treated by KMnO4 solution to improve compatibility before use. Both PBS and treated CSF were compounded using a two-roll mill and then shaped using an injection molding process. The obtained specimens deteriorated under natural soil burial and sunlight exposure conditions for 180 days. All specimens were evaluated through physical observation and various techniques to determine mechanical characteristics. The results indicate that the addition of CSF gave a slight improvement to the hardness, flexural strength, and modulus of the composites than those of neat PBS which increased with higher amounts of CSF. However, the impact strength of the composites was lower than that of neat PBS. For the degradability of PBS composites under soil burial condition, all mechanical properties obviously decreased with each increment of CSF content and the period, which revealed that the PBS/15 phr of CSF composites disintegrated within 60 days. Considering the results under the sunlight exposure condition, the CSF content insignificantly reduced the mechanical properties, indicating that the PBS/CSF composites can be preferentially degraded under the condition of soil burial since both PBS and CSF can be degraded by microbial enzymes in soil, whereas only PBS could be deteriorated in the UV exposure condition.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1150)

Pages:

41-47

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] O. Platnieks, S. Gaidukovs, A. Barkane, A. Sereda, G. Gaidukova, L. Grase, V.K. Thakur, I. Filipova, V. Fridrihsone, M. Skute and M. Laka: Polymers Vol. 12 (2020), p.1472.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12071472

Google Scholar

[2] M. Srikanth, T.S.R.S. Sandeep, K. Sucharitha and S. Godi: Bioresour. Bioprocess. Vol. 9 (2022), p.42.

Google Scholar

[3] S.H. Kim, J.Y. Cho, D.H. Cho, H.J. Jung, B.C. Kim, S.K. Bhatia, S.-H. Park, K. Park and Y.-H. Yang: Polymers. Vol. 14 (2022), p.3978.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Aliotta, M. Seggiani, A. Lazzeri, V. Gigante and P. Cinelli: Polymers Vol. 14 (2022), p.844.

Google Scholar

[5] F.P. La Mantia and M. Morreale: Compos. - A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. Vol. 42 (2011), p.579.

Google Scholar

[6] A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra, L.T. Drzal, S.E. Selke, B.R. Harte and G. Hinrichsen, in: Natural Fibers, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites, edited by A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra and L.T. Drzal, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2005).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203508206.ch1

Google Scholar

[7] O. Faruk, A.K. Bledzki, H.P. Fink and M. Sain: Prog. Polym. Sci. Vol. 37 (2012), p.1552.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Gopinath, M.S. Kumar and A. Elayaperumal: Procedia. Eng. Vol. 97 (2014), p.2052.

Google Scholar

[9] T.H. Nam, S. Ogihara, N.H. Tung and S. Kobayashi: Compos. B Eng. Vol. 42 (2011), p.1648.

Google Scholar

[10] B.P. Calabia, F. Ninomiya, H. Yagi, A. Oishi, K. Taguchi, M. Kunioka and M. Funabashi: Polymers. Vol. 5 (2013), p.128.

DOI: 10.3390/polym5010128

Google Scholar

[11] H.-S. Kim, H.-S. Yang and H.-J. Kim: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 97 (2005), p.1513.

Google Scholar

[12] H.-S. Kim, H.-J. Kim, J.-W. Lee and I.-G. Choi: Polym. Degrad. Stab. Vol. 91 (2006), p.1117.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Sritapunya, A. Rattanapan, P. Sapsrithong, S. Tuampoemsab, P. Suksompoom, C. Lagjaroensakul and P. Dechsiri: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 1086 (2023), p.3.

DOI: 10.4028/p-e2rch8

Google Scholar

[14] H. Anankaphong, D. Pentrakoon and J. Junkasem: Int. J. Polym. Sci. Vol. 2015 (2015), p.1.

Google Scholar

[15] A.Z.M. Rus and S.R. Mohid: Proceedings of the 8th Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET) (2014).

Google Scholar

[16] S. Likittheerakarn, S. Kurdpradid, N. Smittipornpun and T. Sritapunya: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 737 (2017), p.275.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.737.275

Google Scholar

[17] Y.J. Phua, N.S. Lau, K. Sudesh, W.S. Chow and Z.A.M. Ishak: Polym. Degrad. Stab. Vol. 97 (2012), p.1345.

Google Scholar

[18] M.Z.A. Thirmizir, Z.A.M. Ishak, R.M. Taib, S. Rahim and S.M. Jani: J. Polym. Environ. Vol. 19 (2011), p.263.

Google Scholar

[19] J.F. Rabek, in: Polymer Photodegradation: Mechanisms and Experimental Methods, Springer Dordrecht/Chapman and Hall (1995).

Google Scholar

[20] Z.N. Azwa, B.F. Yousif, A.C. Manalo and W. Karunasena: Mater. Des. Vol. 47 (2013), p.424.

Google Scholar