Experimental Research of Gypsum Concrete with Organic Filler

Article Preview

Abstract:

The article provides some information about gypsum concrete, its applications, and the advantage of using organic fillers compared to mineral ones. The optimal technology for the production of gypsum concrete mix was determined, and an economically attractive type of organic filler in the form of chopped corn stalks was established. The compressive strength of the resulting material was studied depending on the fraction of crushed stone used. Effective methods for combating shrinkage cracks at the stage of manufacturing prototypes have been identified, which allows increasing the bearing capacity of the samples by 2.5 times. The water resistance and water absorption of the material, as well as their effect on strength, were investigated. As a result of experimental studies, it was found that the optimal concrete compositions with filler fractions of 3-5 and 5-10 mm should be considered 1:1 and 1:1.5 by volume (binder: filler), which can provide sufficient compressive strength (13-23 MPa) for blocks and slabs of internal partitions and good water resistance (0.91-1.0), while having good sound-absorbing properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1169)

Pages:

127-135

Citation:

Online since:

November 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mahmoud Abu-Saleem & Joseph M. Gattas, Eccentric compression behaviour of hybrid timber-cardboard sandwich columns. Construction and Building Materials, 440 (2024) 137365. ISSN 0950-0618.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137365

Google Scholar

[2] L. Cosentino, J. Fernandes & R. Mateus, Fast-growing bio-based construction materials as an approach to accelerate united nations sustainable development goals. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14 (11) (2024).

DOI: 10.3390/app14114850

Google Scholar

[3] M. Sutkowska, A. Stefańska, M.D. Vaverkova, S. Dixit & A. Thakur, Recent advances in prefabrication techniques for biobased materials towards a low-carbon future: from modules to sustainability. Journal of Building Engineering, 91 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe. 2024.109558.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109558

Google Scholar

[4] Mohanadoss Ponraj & Talaie Amirreza & Rosli Mohamad & Mohamad zin Rosli & Abd Majid & Muhd Zaimi et al., Bioconcrete Strength, durability, permeability, recycling and effects on human health: a review, (2015).

DOI: 10.15224/978-1-63248-062-0-28

Google Scholar

[5] Pandya Pranav & Chunti Kisun & Imboon Tanawat & Polsilapa Sureerat & Thongmee Sirikanjana & Ghosh Sougata, Bioprospecting of Biofilm Producers for Bioconcrete Production. Advances in Materials Science Research, Nova Science Publishers, Chapter 3, (2022) 81-101.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Makhinko, N. Makhinko, To the Calculation of the Optimal Level of Reliability by Using Economic Indicators / Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 47 (2020) 251-259.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_32

Google Scholar

[7] O. Horb, Y. Davidenko, O. Skurupiy, P. Mytrofanov, Application of Bonding Con-crete to Reinforcement Using Adhesives in Steel Concrete Composite Structure. Proceedings of the 2020 session of the 13th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering (Paris, France, August, 26-28 2020 2 – 9.

Google Scholar

[8] Pavel Mytrofanov, Volodymyr Pents, Alla Kariuk, Nataliia Mahas, Oleksandr Horb Structures of reinforced concrete racks of manufacture buildings frames with adhesive joints of concrete and steel. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2684 030029 (2023).

DOI: 10.1063/5.0120191

Google Scholar

[9] O. Gorodetsky, M. Barabash, Y. Filonenko, Numerical Methods for Deter-mining Stiffness Properties of a Bar Cross-Section. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 55 (2019) 1-7.

DOI: 10.1007/s10559-019-00138-3

Google Scholar