Potential and Advantages of Vertical Strip Casting for Production of High-Strength Aluminum-Magnesium Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

High-strength and recycling tolerable aluminum alloys make a significant contribution to weight reduction in modern lightweight construction. The advantages of aluminum alloys in terms of their low density combined with high strength can be significantly improved by the alloy composition. In contrast to the conventionally established process route, high-magnesium alloys can be produced using the twin-roll strip casting process. This allows additional process steps such as hot rolling and annealing to be drastically reduced in the economical production of near-net-shape strips, saving emissions and energy consumption. The strip casting process has already been applied to numerous aluminum alloys and enables their production, although the understanding of advanced alloys in this area is not yet fully understood because of its limited production in industry-related research due to the complexity of the process. However, transferring the high strength generated during rapid solidification into usable sheet performance remains challenging, especially at elevated Mg contents, where segregation, casting-related defects, and solute-affected recrystallization can limit ductility and processability. This study investigates the potential of a high-magnesium aluminum alloy produced by vertical strip casting. The properties of the alloy are correlated with the microstructural and mechanical characteristics and developed on the basis of an industrial reference alloy. For this purpose, an EN AW 5182 and an AlMg10 alloy were processed. The results show that high-magnesium alloys can be produced and processed using strip casting. In terms of the high-magnesium alloy, improved results can be achieved compared to the industrial EN AW 5182 alloy. Key findings: The strength of high-magnesium alloy is significantly above those of the EN-AW 5182 after strip casting enabling nearly 600 N/mm² tensile strength, but the final properties are below this potentially possible characteristic after strip casting, presumably due to non-ideal recrystallization and an insufficiently adapted process route including rolling and annealing parameters.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1188)

Pages:

21-31

Online since:

April 2026

Funder:

The publication of this article was funded by the RWTH Aachen University 10.13039/501100007210

Export:

Share:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lyndon, J.A.; Gupta, R.K.; Gibson, M.A. et al.: Electrochemical behaviour of the β-phase intermetallic (Mg2Al3) as a function of pH as relevant to corrosion of aluminium–magnesium alloys. In: Corrosion Science 70 (2013), S. 290-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.12.022

Google Scholar

[2] Jin, J.W.; Zhang, Z.J.; Li, R.H. et al.: Mechanical properties of three typical aluminum alloy strips prepared by twin-roll casting. In: Journal of Materials Research and Technology 28 (2024), S. 500-511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.256

Google Scholar

[3] Haga, T.; Tkahashi, K.; Ikawaand, M. et al.: Twin roll casting of aluminum alloy strips. In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153-154 (2004), S. 42-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.018

Google Scholar

[4] Lv, Z.; Du, F.; An, Z. et al.: Centerline segregation mechanism of twin-roll cast A3003 strip. In: Journal of Alloys and Compounds 643 (2015), S. 270-274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.132

Google Scholar

[5] Haga, T.; Komeda, K.; Mtsuoka, K. et al.: Roll Casting of Recycled AA5182. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials 121-126 (2011), S. 4667-4670. https://doi.org/10.4028/ www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.4667.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.121-126.4667

Google Scholar

[6] Haga, T.: High Speed Roll Caster for Aluminum Alloy. In: Metals 11 (2021), Heft 3, S. 520.

DOI: 10.3390/met11030520

Google Scholar

[7] Sauvage, X.; Enikeev, N.; Valiev, R. et al.: Atomic-scale analysis of the segregation and precipitation mechanisms in a severely deformed Al–Mg alloy. In: Acta Materialia 72 (2014), S. 125-136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.033

Google Scholar

[8] Ściężor, W.; Mamala, A.; Kowal, R. et al.: Research on the Production Process of High-Strength Products from Aluminum-Magnesium Alloys for their Direct Processing into Sheets Via Cold Rolling. In: Archives of Metallurgy and Materials (2019), S. 1487-1493.

DOI: 10.24425/amm.2019.130117

Google Scholar

[9] Huskins, E.L.; Cao, B.; Ramesh, K.T.: Strengthening mechanisms in an Al–Mg alloy. In: Materials Science and Engineering: A 527 (2010), Heft 6, S. 1292-1298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.056

Google Scholar

[10] Murray, J.L.: The Al-Mg (Aluminum-Magnesium) System. In: Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams (1982), Vol. 3 No.1.

Google Scholar

[11] Haga, T.; Yamazaki, K.; Watari, H. et al.: Effect of Roll Load on Microstructure of Roll Cast Al-10%Mg Strip. In: Materials Science Forum 1097 (2023), S. 25-32.

DOI: 10.4028/p-mIM29B

Google Scholar

[12] DIN-Normenausschuss Zugversuch: DIN EN 6892-1, Metallische Werkstoffe - Teil 1: Prüfverfahren bei Raumtemperatur; Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 6892-1:2019.

DOI: 10.31030/3132591

Google Scholar

[13] DIN-Normenausschuss Nichteisenmetalle: DIN EN 573-3, Aluminium und Aluminiumlegierungen –Chemische Zusammensetzung und Form von Halbzeug –Teil 3: Chemische Zusammensetzung und Erzeugnisformen; Deutsche Fassung EN 573-3:2019+A2:2023.

DOI: 10.31030/3508314

Google Scholar

[14] PAO, P.; JONES, H.; CHENG, S. et al.: Fatigue crack propagation in ultrafine grained Al–Mg alloy. In: International Journal of Fatigue 27 (2005), 10-12, S. 1164-1169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.027

Google Scholar