[1]
Z. Chen, Y. Li, F. Zhao, S. Li, J. Zhang. Progress in numerical simulation of casting process. Measurement and Control, 55/5-6 (2022) 257-264.
DOI: 10.1177/00202940221102656
Google Scholar
[2]
I. Onaji, D. Tiwari, P. Soulatiantork, B. Song, A. Tiwari. Digital twin in manufacturing: Conceptual framework and case studies. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 35/8 (2022) 831–858.
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2022.2027014
Google Scholar
[3]
C. Brecher, M. Dalibor, B. Rumpe, K. Schilling, A. Wortmann, A. An ecosystem for digital shadows in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 104 (2021) 833–838.
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.140
Google Scholar
[4]
B. He, K.-J. Bai, J. Ren. Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review. Advances in Manufacturing, 9/1 (2021) 1–21.
Google Scholar
[5]
Á. Bárkányi, T. Chován, S.Németh, J. Abonyi. Modelling for digital twins—Potential role of surrogate models and uncertainty quantification. Processes, 9/3 (2021) 476.
DOI: 10.3390/pr9030476
Google Scholar
[6]
J. Kang, J. Wang, X. Han, Q. Zhao. Deep learning based heat transfer simulation of the casting process. Scientific Reports, 14 (2024) 29068.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80515-x
Google Scholar
[7]
Q. Zhao, B. Wang, J. Kang. A PIKAN-based model for the prediction of the temperature fields of castings. Scientific Reports (2025) in-press.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-32973-0
Google Scholar
[8]
Z. Lu, N. Ren, X. Xu, J. Li, C. Panwisawas, M. Xia, H. Dong, E. Tsang, J. Li. Real-time prediction and adaptive adjustment of continuous casting based on deep learning. Communications Engineering, 2 (2023) 34.
DOI: 10.1038/s44172-023-00084-1
Google Scholar
[9]
D. Mery. Aluminum casting inspection using deep learning: A method based on convolutional neural networks. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 39/1 (2020) 12.
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-020-0655-9
Google Scholar
[10]
İ. E. Parlak, E. Emel. Deep learning-based detection of aluminum casting defects and their types. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 118 (2023) 105636.
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105636
Google Scholar
[11]
L. Jiang, Y. Wang, Z. Tang, Y. Miao, S. Chen. Casting defect detection in X-ray images using convolutional neural networks and attention-guided data augmentation. Measurement, 170 (2021) 108736.
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108736
Google Scholar
[12]
Y. Zhang, Z. Gao, J. Sun, L. Liu. Machine-Learning Algorithms for Process Condition Data-Based Inclusion Prediction in Continuous-Casting Process: A Case Study. Sensors, 23/15 (2023) 6719.
DOI: 10.3390/s23156719
Google Scholar
[13]
J. Nieves, B. Bravo, D.-C. Sierra. A Smart Digital Twin to Stabilize Return Sand Temperature without Using Coolers. Metals, 12/5 (2022) 730.
DOI: 10.3390/met12050730
Google Scholar
[14]
D. A. Howard, M. Værbak, Z. Ma, B. N. Jørgensen, Z. Ma. Data-driven digital twin for foundry production process: Facilitating best practice operations investigation and impact analysis. In: Energy Informatics: 4th Energy Informatics Academy Conference (EI.A 2024), Proceedings, Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 15271 (2025) 259–273.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-74738-0_17
Google Scholar
[15]
T. Bauernhansl, S. Hartleif, T. Felix. The digital shadow of production—A concept for the effective and efficient information supply in dynamic industrial environments. Procedia CIRP, 72 (2018) 69–74.
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.188
Google Scholar
[16]
D. Liu, Y. Du, W. Chai, C. Lu, M. Cong. Digital twin and data-driven quality prediction of complex die-casting manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18/11 (2022) 8119–8128.
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2022.3168309
Google Scholar
[17]
A. Shafyei, S. H. M. Anijdan, A. Bahrami. Prediction of porosity percent in Al–Si casting alloys using ANN. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 431/1–2 (2006) 206–210.
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.150
Google Scholar
[18]
S. Shahane, N. Aluru, P. Ferreira, S. G. Kapoor, S. P. Vanka. Optimization of solidification in die casting using numerical simulations and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 51 (2020) 130–141.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.016
Google Scholar
[19]
Z. Jiang, C. Xu, J. Liu, W. Luo, Z. Chen, W. Gui. A dual closed-loop digital twin construction method for optimizing the copper disc casting process. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11/3 (2024) 581–594.
DOI: 10.1109/jas.2023.123777
Google Scholar
[20]
A. Ktari, M. El Mansori. Digital twin of functional gating system in 3D printed molds for sand casting using a neural network. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33/3 (2022) 897–909.
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01699-3
Google Scholar
[21]
https://www.bayrammetal.com.tr/uploads/docs/en-ab-and-ac-44000.pdf.
Google Scholar
[22]
J. Campbell. Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Metallurgy, Techniques and Design, 2nd edition, Butterworth-Heinemann,2015.
Google Scholar
[23]
G. C. Vosniakos, A. Vassiliou, S. Tsekouras. Numerical simulation of sand casting of an aluminium part. In: B. Katalinic (ed), Annals of DAAAM for 2011 & Proceedings of the 22nd International DAAAM Symposium, Vol. 22, No. 1, November 2011, 445-446, Danube Adria Association for Automation and Manufacturing (DAAAM), Vienna, Austria.
DOI: 10.2507/22nd.daaam.proceedings.221
Google Scholar
[24]
A. N. Vasileiou, G.-C. Vosniakos, D.I. Pantelis. Determination of local heat transfer coefficients in precision castings by genetic optimisation aided by numerical simulation. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 229/4 (2015) 735-750.
DOI: 10.1177/0954406214539468
Google Scholar
[25]
N. Kovachki, Z. Li, B. Liu, K. Azizzadenesheli, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, A. Anandkumar. Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spaces, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24/89 (2023) 1–97.
DOI: 10.52202/068431-1220
Google Scholar
[26]
G. Baruffa, A. Pieressa, M. Sorgato, G. Lucchetta. Transfer learning-based artificial neural network for predicting weld line occurrence through process simulations and molding trials. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 8/3 (2024) 98.
DOI: 10.3390/jmmp8030098
Google Scholar