Effects of Human Factors on Performance of Advanced Manufacturing Technology: An Empirical Examination

Article Preview

Abstract:

To be successful in this globally competitive and rapidly changing situation, organizational changes, which must be consistent with the implementation of manufacturing technology, are required. This study proposes that human factors in the organization have improved the implementation effects of AMT. Based on a brief review of relevant literatures, three categories including twelve indicators are concluded as valid and reliable measures of the implementation effects of AMT. Using the result from a survey of 87 equipment manufacturing firms in the northeast of China, a stepwise regression analysis is conducted to investigate the diversity influence on AMT implementation by human factors. The results show that training, equitable reward and team cooperation have positive effect on operational performance; equitable reward, empowerment and team cooperation are positively correlated with organizational and managerial performance; the relationship between team cooperation and competitive performance is significant and positive.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 505-507)

Pages:

901-906

Citation:

Online since:

January 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.V. Saraph: Production and Inventory Management Journal Vol. 33 (1992), p.64.

Google Scholar

[2] J.H. Sheridan: Industry Week Vol. 239 (1990), p.62.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Zairi: International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol. 12 (1992), p.34.

Google Scholar

[4] M.H. Small and M.M. Yasin: Journal of Operations Management Vol. 15 (1997), p.349.

Google Scholar

[5] C.M. McDermott and G.N. Stock: Journal of Operations Management Vol. 17 (1999), p.521.

Google Scholar

[6] Pao-Long Chang and S.C. Scott: International Journal of Management Vol. 19 (2002), p.206.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Efstathiades and S. Tassou: Technovation Vol. 22 (2002), p.210.

Google Scholar

[8] K.K. Boyer: Journal of Operations Management Vol. 15 (1997), p.331.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Tracey and M.A. Vonderembse: Journal of Operations Management Vol. 17 (1999), p.411.

Google Scholar

[10] D.E. Leigh and K.D. Gifford: Industrial Relations Vol. 38 (1999), p.174.

Google Scholar

[11] C.A. Chung: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Vol. 13 (1996), p.283.

Google Scholar

[12] A.S. Scott and P.L. David: Journal of Management Studies Vol. 37 (2000), p.445.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Robey and J.W. Ross: Journal of Management Information Systems Vol. 19 (2002), p.17.

Google Scholar

[14] C.C. Henry and B.E. Patuwo: International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol. 18 (1998), p.87.

Google Scholar

[15] K.A. Ghani and V. Jayabalan: Journal of High Technology Management Research Vol. 13 (2002), p.157.

Google Scholar