Light Alloy Castings for Automotive Applications: The Case of Al vs. Mg

Article Preview

Abstract:

The economical and environmental effects of mass reduction through Al and Mg primary alloys substitutions for cast iron and steel in automotive components are discussed using M.F. Ashby’s penalty functions method. The viability of Mg alloy substitutions for existing Al alloy cast components is also considered. The cost analysis shows that direct, equal-volume, Al alloy substitutions for cast iron and steel are the most feasible in terms of the CAFE liability, followed by substitutions involving flat panels of prescribed stiffness. When the creation of CO2 associated to the production of Al and Mg is considered, the potential gasoline savings over the lifespan of the car compensate for the intrinsic environmental burden of Al in all applications, while electrolytic Mg substitutions for cast iron and steel are feasible for equal volume and panels only. Magnesium produced by the Pidgeon thermal process appears to be too primary energy intensive to be competitive in structural applications. Magnesium substitutions for existing Al alloy beams and panels are generally unviable. The current higher recycling efficiency of Al casting alloys confers Al a significant advantage over Mg alloys.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 519-521)

Pages:

1801-1808

Citation:

Online since:

July 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Johnson, Advanced Materials and Processes 160, (2002) 62.

Google Scholar

[2] U.S. Congress, 1975, http: /www. ita. doc. gov/td/auto/cafe. html; Accessed on: October 20, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Life cycle inventory of the worldwide aluminium industry with regard to energy consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases. Part 1 - automotive; International Aluminium Institute, http: /www. world-aluminum. org/iai/publications/, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] M.P. Thomas and A.H. Wirtz, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 10, (1994) 193.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Hoyle, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 15, (1995) 181.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Koltun, A. Tharumarajah, and S. Ramakrishnan, In: N.R. Neelameggham, H.I. Kaplan and B.R. Powell (Ed. ) Magnesium Technology 2005, San Francisco, CA; TMS (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society), Warrendale, 2005, 43.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Ramakrishnan and P. Koltun, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 42, (2004) 49.

Google Scholar

[8] M.F. Ashby, Acta Mater. 48, (2000) 359.

Google Scholar

[9] M.F. Ashby, Materials selection in mechanical design (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2005).

Google Scholar

[10] P.M. Weaver, M.F. Ashby, S. Burgess, and N. Shibaike, Materials & Design 17, (1996) 11.

Google Scholar

[11] W.S. Miller, L. Zhuang, J. Bottema, A.J. Wittebrood, P. De Smet, A. Haszler, and A. Vieregge, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280, (2000) 37.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00653-x

Google Scholar

[12] Granta Design Ltd., CES Selector, 2005, http: /www. grantadesign. com.

Google Scholar

[13] American Metal Market Daily, 2005, www. amm. com; Accessed on: June 14, (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] D.A. Kramer, U.S. Geological Survey, 2005, http: /minerals. usgs. gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/magnesium/mgmis1q05. xls; Accessed on: June 23, (2005).

Google Scholar

[15] L. Holloway, Mater. Design 19, (1998) 133.

Google Scholar

[16] U.G.K. Wegst and M.F. Ashby, In: (Ed. ) The 3rd Bienal World Conf. on Integrated Design and Process Technnology (IDTP), Berlin, Germany; 1998, 88.

Google Scholar

[17] C. Hunt, Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, http: /colinhunt. zenburger. com/australiangreenhouse. html; Accessed on: June 28, (2005).

Google Scholar

[18] C. Bae and N. Trumbul, Center for Climate Change and Environmental Forecasting, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005, http: /courses. washington. edu/gmforum/topics/trans_climate/trans_climate. htm; Accessed on: June 15, (2005).

Google Scholar

[19] P.A. Plunkert, U.S. Geological Survey, 2005, http: /www. usgs. gov/pubprod; Accessed on: October 20, (2005).

Google Scholar

[20] D.A. Kramer, U.S. Geological Survey, 2004, http: /pubs. usgs. gov/circ/2004/1196am/; Accessed on: October 20, (2005).

Google Scholar

[21] ODNR, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, 2005, http: /www. dnr. state. oh. us/recycling/awareness/facts/aluminum. htm; Accessed on: October 24, (2005).

Google Scholar

[22] S.F. Sibley and W.C. Butterman, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 15, (1995) 259.

Google Scholar

[23] S. Valtierra, Personal communication; svaltier@nemak. com, Nemak Pty., Monterrey, Mexico; (2005).

Google Scholar

[24] G. Hanko and G. Macher, In: H.I. Kaplan (Ed. ) Magnesium Technology 2003, San Diego; TMS (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society), Warrendale, 2003, 29.

Google Scholar

[25] K. Buxmann, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 10, (1994) 17.

Google Scholar