Effect of Residual Carbon on the Microstructure Evolution during the Sintering of M2 HSS Parts Shaping by Metal Injection Moulding Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this present investigation, Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) of M2 High Speed Steel (HSS) parts using a wax-High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) binder is shown. This work is focused on the examination of the sintering densification and microstructure evolution of the parts. The injection molding process of the feedstock has been optimized to obtain high quality green parts. The elimination of organic binder was carried out by thermal debinding under inert atmosphere. In order to keep carbon in the sample that could improve the sintering process, incomplete debinding was performed between 450 and 600 °C. The specimens were sintered at temperatures between 1210 and 1280oC in high vacuum atmosphere, obtaining the 98% of the theoretical density. A homogeneous distribution of fine M6C carbides was obtained as well as V-rich carbides (MX) during sintering which reinforced the HSS and hence increasing the mechanical properties of the parts. In the samples with higher residual carbon content, the sintering window was extended up to 20 degrees and the optimum temperature was lower.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 534-536)

Pages:

353-356

Citation:

Online since:

January 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.M. German and A. Bose. Injection Molding of Metals and Ceramics (MPIF, Princeton, NJ. 1997).

Google Scholar

[2] R. M German. Powder Injection Molding. (MPIF, Princeton, NJ. 1990).

Google Scholar

[3] R. M German. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy Vol. 26, 1. (1990), p.23.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Jauregi, F. Fernández, R.H. Palma, V. Martínez, J.J. Urcola. Metall. Trans. A, 23A. (1992).

Google Scholar

[5] N. Myers, R.M. German. The International Journal of Powder Metallurgy Vol. 35, 6. (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] C. S. Wright, A. S. Wronski, I. Iturriza. Materials Science and Technology Vol. 16. (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] P. Maulik, W.J.C. Price. Powder Metallurgy Vol. 30, 4. (1987), pp.240-248.

Google Scholar

[8] W. J. C. Price, M. M. Rebbeck, A.S. Wronski. Powder Metall. Vol. 28, 1. (1985).

Google Scholar

[9] B. Levenfeld, A. Várez and J.M. Torralba. Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, vol. 33A (2002) p.1843.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Herranz, B. Levenfeld, A. Várez, J.M. Torralba. Powder Metall. 48, 2 (2005), pp.134-138.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Herranz, B. Levenfeld, A. Várez, J.M. Torralba. Adv. Powder Metall. Particul. Mater. Vol. 10 (2002), p.366.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Herranz, B. Levenfeld, A. Várez, J.M. Torralba. Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 426-432, (2003).

Google Scholar

[13] G. Herranz, R. Nagel, R. Zauner, B. Levenfeld, A. Várez, J.M. Torralba. Proc. of PM 2004 Powder Metallurgy World Congress Vol. 4 (2004), pp.397-402.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Várez, J. Portuondo, B. Levenfeld, J.M. Torralba. Mater. Chemistry and Physics Vol. 67, (2001), pp.43-48.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Zhang. Materials and Manufacturing Processes vol. 12, 4 (1997).

Google Scholar

[16] Z. Y. Liu, N. H Loh, K.A. Khor, S.B. Tor. Materials Letters 45 (2000).

Google Scholar

[17] Wright C.S., Ogel B. Powder Metallurgy Vol. 36, 3. (1993), pp.213-219 Fig. 3. - SEM micrographs of M2 samples debound at different temperatures: (A) 500ºC (2%C) and (B) 550ºC (1%C) and both sintered at 1240ºC. A B.

Google Scholar