Atomic Simulations on the Grain Subdivision of a Crystalline Metal

Article Preview

Abstract:

The relationship between grain subdivision mechanisms of a crystalline metal and the strain gradient under severe plastic deformation is studied by using molecular dynamics simulations in quasi two dimensions. Two problems are simulated for single crystal models: (a) uniaxial tensile and compressive deformation and (b) localized shear deformation. In the case of uniaxial deformation, a large number of dislocation pairs with opposite Burgers vectors are generated under deformation, but most dislocations are vanished due to pair annihilation under relaxation. Therefore, no dislocation boundary can be formed. On the other hand, in case of localized shear deformation with large strain gradient, dislocation boundaries are formed between undeformed and deformed regions. These dislocations can be regarded as geometrically necessary dislocations. Consequently, the importance of the strain gradient to make grain boundaries under plastic deformation can be confirmed by atomic simulations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 561-565)

Pages:

1983-1986

Citation:

Online since:

October 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Furukawa, Z. Horita, M. Nemoto and T.G. Langdon: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 324 (2002), p.82.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Hansen: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Vol. 32A (2001), p.2917.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Mishin, M.J. Mehl, D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, A.F. Vorter and J.D. Kress: Physical Review B Vol. 63 (2001), p.224106.

Google Scholar

[4] J.D. Honeycutt and H.C. Andersen: The Journal of Physical Chemistry Vol. 91 (1987), p.4950.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Parrinello and A Rahman: Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 52 (1981), p.7182. 0.

Google Scholar

0 0. 2 0. 4 0. 6 0. 8 1. 0 1. 2 1. 4 proportion of defects γ time [ns] proportion of defects all defects defects in grain boundaries fgb allf 1st process 2nd process 3rd process.

Google Scholar

2 0. 8 1. 0 1. 2.

Google Scholar

4 0. 6 0.

Google Scholar

06 BA A AB B Fig. 4 Proportion of defects Fig. 5 The fall vs the number of deformation processes.

Google Scholar