The Use of Electromagnetic Fields for the Detection of Inclusions in Aluminium

Article Preview

Abstract:

Management of inclusions is an important part of quality control within the aluminium cast house. Inclusions have a detrimental effect on many aluminium cast products. The ability to reliably detect inclusions in a timely fashion is an essential part of this process. There are a number of tools available for inclusion measurement based on different principles. Techniques for inclusion detection such as metallurgical analysis, K-Mold, Podfa, Lais, Prefil all have a delay before detailed results are available. Ultrasound provides a possible technique for an online sensor, however has not as yet managed sufficient sensitivity. LiMCA, based on the Electrical Sensing Zone, has provided the most sensitive online detection to date, but other electromagnetic techniques such as a multiple voltage array sensor offer promise of a sensor which can be built for lower cost and can sample a larger portion of the melt.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

155-164

Citation:

Online since:

October 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Neff, D.V. (2004) Evaluating Molten Metal Cleanliness for Producing High Integrity Aluminum Die Castings, in Die Casting Engineer, 2-6.

Google Scholar

[2] Rasmussen, W.M. (1996) Aluminum Melt's Cleanliness, in Modern Casting, 45-48.

Google Scholar

[3] Ihara, I., Aso, H. and Burhan, D. (2004) In-situ observation of alumina particles in molten aluminum using a focused ultrasonic sensor. JSME International Journal, Series A: Solid Mechanics and Material Engineering, 47(3), 280-286.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmea.47.280

Google Scholar

[4] Makarov, S., Apelian, D. and Ludwig, R. (1999) Inclusion Removal and Detection in Molten Aluminum: Mechanical, Electromagnetic and Acoustic Techniques (99-150). TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN FOUNDRYMENS SOCIETY, 727-736.

Google Scholar

[5] Simensen, C.J. and Berg, G. (1980) A survey of inclusions in aluminum. Aluminium (Isernhagen, Germany), 56(5), 335-40.

Google Scholar

[6] Keles, O. and Dundar, M. (2007) Aluminum foil: Its typical quality problems and their causes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 186(1-3), 125-137.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.027

Google Scholar

[7] Guthrie, R.I.L. and Li, M. (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] Doutre, D., et al. (1985) Aluminum cleanliness monitoring: methods and applications in process development and quality control. Light Metals (Warrendale, PA, United States), 1179-95.

Google Scholar

[9] Tian, C., et al. (2002) Effect of melt cleanliness on the formation of porosity defects in automotive aluminium high pressure die castings. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 122(1), 82-93.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01229-8

Google Scholar

[10] Makarov, S., Ludwig, R. and Apelian, D. (1999) Electromagnetic visualization technique for non-metallic inclusions in a melt. Measurement Science and Technology, 10(11), 1047-1053.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/10/11/312

Google Scholar

[11] Ono, Y., Moisan, J.F. and Jen, C.K. (2003) Ultrasonic Techniques for Imaging and Measurements in Molten Aluminum. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 50(12), 1711-1721.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2003.1256312

Google Scholar

[12] Enright, P.G. and Hughes, I.R. (1995) A new shop floor technique for quantitative measurement of molten cleanliness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Molten Aluminum Processing, 4th, Orlando, Fla., Nov. 12-14, 1995, p.431.

Google Scholar

[13] Simard, A.A. et al. (2000).

Google Scholar

[14] Rinderer, B., Danilova, N. and Couper, M. (2005) A comparison of LAIS and PoDFA analysis of metal cleanliness. in Proceedings of the Australasian Conference and Exhibition - Aluminium Cast House Technology, Melbourne.

Google Scholar

[15] Dion, S. (2004) Device and method for measuring metal inclusions (Alcan International Limited, Can. ), WO, 20 pp.

Google Scholar

[16] Jen, C.K., Legoux, J.G. and Parent, L. (2000) Experimental evaluation of clad metallic buffer rods for high temperature ultrasonic measurements. NDT and E International, 33(3), 145-153.

DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(99)00042-0

Google Scholar

[17] Ihara, I., et al. (2002) Ultrasonic in-line sensors for inclusion detection in liquid metals. in Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Munich, Germany.

DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2002.1193521

Google Scholar

[18] Aubrey, L.S., Smith, D.D. and Martins, L.C.B. (2001) New product developments for aluminum cast houses. in Proceedings of the Australian Asian Pacific Conference on Aluminium Cast House Technology.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118806364.ch4

Google Scholar

[19] Ono, Y., et al. (2004) An On-Line Ultrasonic Cleanliness Analyzer for Molten Light Metals. JOM, 56(2), 59-64.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-004-0148-9

Google Scholar

[20] Ono, Y., et al. (2002) Development of ultrasonic techniques with buffer rod in molten aluminum. in Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Munich, Germany.

DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2002.1193520

Google Scholar

[21] Ihara, I., Jen, C.K. and Franca, D.R. (2000) Ultrasonic imaging, particle detection, and V(z) measurements in molten zinc using focused clad buffer rods. Review of Scientific Instruments, 71(9), 3579-3586.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1287041

Google Scholar

[22] Falk, H. and Wintjens, P. (1998) Statistical evaluation of single sparks. Spectrochimica Acta - Part B Atomic Spectroscopy, 53(1), 49-62.

DOI: 10.1016/s0584-8547(97)00128-6

Google Scholar

[23] Kuss, H. -M., et al. (2002) Comparison of spark OES methods for analysis of inclusions in iron base matters. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 374(7-8), 1242-1249.

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1595-1

Google Scholar

[24] Mohamed, W.T.Y. (2008) Improved LIBS limit of detection of Be, Mg, Si, Mn, Fe and Cu in aluminum alloy samples using a portable Echelle spectrometer with ICCD camera. Optics and Laser Technology, 40(1), 30-38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.04.004

Google Scholar

[25] Nieuwenhuis, J.H., et al. (2004) Integrated Coulter counter based on 2-dimensional liquid aperture control. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, 102(1), 44-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2003.10.017

Google Scholar

[26] Martin, J. -P., Hachey, R. and Painchaud, F. (1994) Online metal cleanliness determination in molten aluminum alloys using the LiMCA II analyzer. Light Metals (Warrendale, PA, United States), pp.915-20.

Google Scholar

[27] Mei, L.I. and Guthrie, R.I.L. (2000).

Google Scholar

[28] Simard, A., et al. (2001).

Google Scholar

[29] Li, M. and Guthrie, R.I.L. (2003) Molten Metal Inclusion Sensor Probes, Limca Research: United States.

Google Scholar

[30] Pedneau, N. and Pekguleryuz, M.O. (1997) Equiaxed-grain size analysis in the mushy zone during solidification via an in-situ method based on the electrical sensing zone principle. Scripta Materialia, 37(7), 903-909.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(97)00206-6

Google Scholar

[31] ABB (2007) The ABB Group - Automation and Power Technologies. [Webpage] [cited 31 Nov 2007]; ABB Group]. Available from: www. abb. com.

Google Scholar

[32] ABB (2007) Analyze IT - LiMCA II Liquid Metal Cleanliness Analyzer. Retrieved (2007).

Google Scholar

[33] Ludwig, R., Apelian, D. and Makarov, S. (2002) Systems for detecting measuring inclusions, United States. p.19.

Google Scholar

[34] Lemdiasov, R.A. and Ludwig, R. (2004) Mathematical Design of an Electromagnetic Separation Sensor in Molten Aluminum. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 40(1 I), 37-42.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.821120

Google Scholar

[35] Makarov, S., Ludwig, R. and Apelian, D. (2000) Identification of depth and size of subsurface defects by a multiple-voltage probe sensor: Analytical and neural network techniques. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 19(2), 67-80.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1306114

Google Scholar

[36] Brown, B.H. (2003) Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): A review. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 27(3), 97-108.

Google Scholar

[37] Schuessler, T.F. and Bates, J.H.T. (1998) Current patterns and electrode types for singlesource electrical impedance tomography of the thorax. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 26(2), 253-259.

DOI: 10.1114/1.116

Google Scholar

[38] Dickin, F. and Wang, M. (1996) Electrical resistance tomography for process applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 7(3), 247-260.

Google Scholar

[39] Jordana, J., Gasulla, M. and Pallas-Areny, R. (2001) Electrical resistance tomography to detect leaks from buried pipes. Measurement Science and Technology, 12(8), 1061-1068.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/12/8/311

Google Scholar

[40] Yi, M.J., et al. (2001) Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structures using resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(4), 483-497.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00269.x

Google Scholar