Characterization of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of AA6056 T651 and T6: Application to Predict Fatigue Behaviour of Stiffened Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tensile and fatigue crack growth tests of the 6056 T651 and T6 aluminium alloys were carried out. The fatigue crack propagation tests were performed on compact tension 4mm thick (CT) specimens, under cyclic loading with R ratios 0.1 and 0.5. The resulting data was used to predict the fatigue behaviour of stiffened panels subjected to fatigue loading under similar R ratios. The AA6056-T651 panels were fabricated using High Speed Machining (HSM) starting with 30mm thick plates. AA6056-T651 CT specimens were cut from the panels mentioned above, whereas AA6056-T6 CT specimens were machined from 5mm thick material. It was found that the AA6056-T651 (HSM material) specimens, machined from a 30mm thick plate presented higher rupture and yield stress than the AA6056-T6 material extracted from a 5mm thick plate. When tested at the same R value the AA6056-T6 specimens present higher crack growth rate than the AA6056-T651 specimens.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 636-637)

Pages:

1511-1517

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Murphy, A., et al., The computational post-buckling analysis of fuselage stiffened panels loaded in shear. Thin-Walled Structures, 2005. 43(9): pp.1455-1474.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2005.03.010

Google Scholar

[2] Wagner, H., Structures of thin sheet metal, their design and construction, in Technical note 490 - �ational Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. (1928).

Google Scholar

[3] Holt, M., Tests of aluminium alloy stiffened sheet specimens cut from an airplane wing, in Technical note 883 - �ational Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. (1943).

Google Scholar

[4] Aalberg, A., M. Langseth, and P. Larsen, Stiffened aluminium panels subjected to axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 2001. 39(10): pp.861-885.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(01)00021-0

Google Scholar

[5] E8-03, A., Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] E647-05, A., Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Vaidya, W., K. Angamuthu, and M. Kocak. Effect of load ratio and temper on fatigue crack propagation behaviour of Al-Alloys 6056. in 8th International Fatigue Congress - FATIGUE 2002. 2002. Stockholm, Sweden.

Google Scholar

[8] Paris, P., P. Gomez, and W. Anderson, A rational analytic theory of fatigue. The Trend in Engineering, 1961. 13(1): pp.9-14.

Google Scholar

[9] Moreira, P.M.G.P., Lightweight Stiffened Panels: Mechanical Characterization of Emerging Fabrication Technologies, in Mechanical Engineering. 2008, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto: Porto.

Google Scholar

[10] Pisa, U. o., WP3: Manufacturing and testing, Status at month 30. DaToN project, meeting at Brno, slides presentation, 15-16 October (2007).

Google Scholar