Static and Dynamic Crushing Behaviors of Aluminum Foam

Article Preview

Abstract:

Quasi-static and dynamic axial crushing tests were carried out to investigate the energy absorption capacity of aluminum foam with several densities. First, aluminum foam samples with three densities were crushed quasi-statically to study their compression characteristics, the stress strain relationship curves and energy absorption capacities were achieved from the test results; then dynamic crushing tests were carried out to check the crushing behaviors of the corresponding samples; finally, the energy absorption capacities of tested samples were compared. According to the tests results, all the aluminum foam samples showed very good isotropy and very high mass specific energy absorption capacities. For the crushing tests, the dynamic crushing behaviors were very similar to the static ones, which meant aluminum foam was insensitive to the crash velocity tested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 675-677)

Pages:

601-605

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gibson LJ and Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structures and properties. Cambridge University Press; (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Sugimura Y., Meyer J., He M., Bart-Smith H., Grenstedt J. and Evans A. Acta Materialia, Vol. 45(1997), 5245~5259.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(97)00148-1

Google Scholar

[3] Fusheng H, Zhengang Z. Journal of Materials Science, 1999, Vol. 34(2), 291~299.

Google Scholar

[4] Andrews E., Sanders W., Gibson L.J. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 270 (1999), 113~124.

Google Scholar

[5] Idris M.I., Vodenitcharovaa T. and Hoffman M. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 517(2009), 37~45.

Google Scholar

[6] Ramamurty U. and Kumaran M. C. Acta Materialia, Vol. 52(2004), 181~189.

Google Scholar

[7] Mohamad R. Said and Chee-Fai Tan. Chiang Mai Journal of Science, Vol. 35(2008) , 241~249.

Google Scholar

[8] Yongliang Mu, and Guangchun Yao. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 527(2010), 1117~1119.

Google Scholar

[9] Edwin R, Venkitanarayanan P and Daniel B.S.S. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 521(2009), 11~15.

Google Scholar

[10] Gassa J. and Harwick W. Journal of Materials Science Letters, Vol. 20(2001), 1047~1048.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhao H, I. Elnasri and S. Abdennadher. International Journal of Mechanical Science, Vol. 47(2005), 757~774.

Google Scholar

[12] Tan P J, Reid S R, Harrigan J J , et al. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 53(2005), 2174~2205.

Google Scholar

[13] Tan P J , Reid S R , Harrigan J J , et al. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 53(2005), 2206~2230.

Google Scholar

[14] Mukai T., Miyoshi T., Nakano S., Somekawa H., Higashi K. Scripta Materialia. Vol. 54 (2006), 533~537.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.062

Google Scholar

[15] Hall I W, Guden M and Yu C J. Scripta Materialia, 2000, 43(6): 515~521.

Google Scholar

[16] Mukai T., Kanahashi H., Miyoshi T., Mabuchi M., Nieh T.G., Higashi K. Scripta Materialia. Vol. 40 (1999), 921~927.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(99)00038-x

Google Scholar

[17] Dannemann K. and Lankford J. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 293 (2000), 157~164.

Google Scholar

[18] Kanahashi H., Mukai T., Yamada Y., Shinojima K., et al. Higashi. Mat. Sci. and Eng. A, Vol. 280 (2000), 349~353.

Google Scholar

[19] Ruan D., Lu G., Chen F. L, Siores E. Composite Structures, Vol. 57(2002), 331~336.

Google Scholar

[20] Hanssen A G, Langseth M and Hopperstad O S. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 43(2001), 153~176.

Google Scholar

[21] Chen W G. International Journal of Solids and Structure, Vol. 38(2001), 7919~7944.

Google Scholar

[22] Wang QC, Fan ZJ, Song HW and Gui LJ. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 10(2005), 535-543.

Google Scholar