Matrix-Based Model of the Carbon Footprint Analysis for Thermal Power Generation in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the increasing seriousness of climate change problem, carbon footprint has become a very useful method to measure carbon emissions and has been widely accepted. In modern industry, electricity is almost consumed in all industry processes, and electricity is the first "footprint" of most products. As carbon emissions is always measured by theoretical estimation from input inventory but not experimental data, the input inventory of electricity generation becomes very important in carbon footprint analysis. Electricity generation is a very complex process, where all input items inter-dependant on each other and the whole system is an infinite cycle net. But in the traditional calculation model of input inventory, the interaction effect of production system is usually neglected. The major work of this study is to make clear the carbon emissions of provision 1kWh thermal power generation to consumers in China in 2006, since thermal power generation takes the most proportion of Chinese electricity. This study used a matrix-based model which includes interaction effect of the system to calculate the input inventory of electricity generation, and then the carbon emissions of thermal electricity generation in China in 2006 can be calculated. The final result of this paper can be used in carbon footprint, Life Cycle Assessment or some other related fields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

230-238

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Wiedmann, J. Minx. A Definition of Carbon Footprint,. In: C. C. Pertsova, Ecological Economics Research Trends: Chapter 1, pp.1-11, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY, USA. (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] UK Carbon Trust. Carbon Footprint: An introduction for organizations. UK: Carbon Trust. (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] European Commission. CARBON FOOTPRINT-what it is and how to measure it. http: /lca. jrc. ec. europa. eu/Carbon_footprint. pdf, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] ETAP. The Carbon Trust Helps UK Businesses Reduce their Environmental Impact. http: /ec. europa. eu/environment/etap/pdfs/jan07_carbon_trust_initiative. pdf, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Finkbeiner. Carbon footprint—opportunities and threats. Int J LCA. 2009, 14(2): 91-94.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Johnson. Charocal versus LPG grilling: A carbon-footprint comparison. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2009, 29(6): 370-378.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.004

Google Scholar

[7] D. Giurco, J.G. Petrie. Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of copper: New technologies, more recycling or demand management? Minerals Engineering. 2007, 20(9): 42-853.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.04.014

Google Scholar

[8] E. Johnson. Disagreement over carbon footprints: A comparison of electric and LPG forklifts. 2008, 36(4): 1569-1573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.014

Google Scholar

[9] B. Welch, M. Iffert, M. Skyllas Kazacos. Applying fundamental data to reduce the carbon dioxide footprint of aluminum smelters. Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society. 2008, 60(11): 17-24.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-008-0141-9

Google Scholar

[10] British Standards Institution. PAS 2050 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] Chinese editorial committee of Electricity Yearbook of China. Electricity Yearbook of China 2007. Beijing: China Electric Press. (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] A. Rafaschieri, M. Rapaccini, G. Manfrida. Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from poplar energy crops compared with conventional fossil fuels. Energy Convers Manage. 1999, 40(14): 1477–1493.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(99)00076-x

Google Scholar

[13] A. Dubreuil. Inventory for Energy Production in Canada. Int J LCA. 2001, 6(5): 281–284.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Coltro, E.C.E. García, G.C. Queiroz. Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil. Int J LCA 2003, 8(5): 290–296.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02978921

Google Scholar

[15] K.M. Lee, S.Y. Lee, T. Hur. Life cycle inventory analysis for electricity in Korea. Energy. 2004, 29(1): 87–101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2003.08.007

Google Scholar

[16] M.A. Curran, M. Mann, G. Norris. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. J Clean Prod. 2005: 13(8): 853–862.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001

Google Scholar

[17] C.W. Babbitt, A.S. Lindner. A life cycle inventory of coal used for electricity production in Florida. J Clean Prod. 2005, 13(9): 903–912.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.04.007

Google Scholar

[18] X.H. Di, Z.R. Nie, B.R. Yuan, et al. Life cycle inventory for thermal electricity generation in China. Int J LCA. 2007, 12(4): 217-224.

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.05.331

Google Scholar

[19] Y. Mastuno, M. Betz. Development of Life Cycle Inventories for Electricity Grid Mixes in Japan. Int J LCA. 2002, 5(5): 294-305.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02977583

Google Scholar

[20] Department of Industry and Transport Statistics, National Development and Reform Commission. China Energy Statistical yearbook 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (2007).

Google Scholar

[21] X.H. Di. Several Fundamental Researches in The Life Cycle Assessment for Mineral Resources and Materials. Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing University of Technology.

Google Scholar

[22] Z.X. Wu, W.Y. Chen. The diversified clean energy resources strategies with coal as the backbone. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. (2000).

Google Scholar

[23] IPCC/OECD. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Reference Manual. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bracknell, U. K, (1997).

Google Scholar