The Simulation of Stress-Induced Phase Transition of L10 Re-Precipitation Based on Microscopic Phase-Field Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is common that the pre-precipitation phase with kinetics advantage is found during non-equilibrium transformation. The continuously changed stress in the transformation increases the complication of precipitation process. The stress induces Ll0 pre-precipitation phase in Ni75-Al12.5-V12.5 alloy is studied by microscope phase-field model in this paper. It is particularly show that Ll2 phase precipitates directly without stress. There is no Ll0 phase to be found in the disordered matrix. Oppositely, Ll0 phase precipitates firstly with stress, and then it turns into Ll2 phase. When stress is less, either or both above situations are observed. While stress is stronger, a large range of Ll0 phase precipitates firstly. Then a part of it dissolves. The rest turns into Ll2 phase. The precipitation of pre-precipitation phase accelerates the precipitation process. The larger the stress and the more Ll0 phase precipitation, the longer it exists and the shorter the induction period is.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

226-234

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Reinhard L and Turchi P E A. Phys Re. Lett, 1994; 72(1): 120.

Google Scholar

[2] Ni J and Gu B L. Phys Rev Lett, 1997; 79(20): 3922.

Google Scholar

[3] Sirota E B and Herhold A B. Science, 1999; 283(5401): 529.

Google Scholar

[4] Bertrand V D M Reynard B, McMillan F P, Wilson M, Beck P, Gillet P, Jahn S. Earth Planet Sc Lett, 2007; 261(3-4): 469.

Google Scholar

[5] Wang C, Nuhfer N T and Sridhar S. Metall Mater Trans B, 2009; 40(6): 1022.

Google Scholar

[6] Razumov I K. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 2008; 81(4): 826.

Google Scholar

[7] Ringer S P, Hono K. Mater. Characterization , 2000, 44: 101.

Google Scholar

[8] Silcock J M, Flower HM. Scripta. Mater , 2002, 46: 389.

Google Scholar

[9] Liu Zongchang, Ren Huiping, Wang Haiyan. Heat treatment of metals , 2004, 29(12): 58-61.

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Tao, Yin Zhimin, Shen Ka et al. Trans. Nonfcrrous Met. Soc. China, 2007, 17: 548-552.

Google Scholar

[11] Gang Sha , Alfred Cerezo. Acta Materialia , 2004, 52(15): 4503–4516.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Premkumar, K.S. Prasad, A.K. Singh. Intermetallics, 2009, 17: 142–145.

Google Scholar

[13] Keith E. Knipling, David C. Dunand, David N. Seidman. Acta Materialia , 2008, 56: 1182–1195.

Google Scholar

[14] Khachaturyan A G. Theory of Structural Transformation in Solids. New York: Wiley, 1983: 129.

Google Scholar

[15] L. Q. Chen. Acta Metall Mater, 1994, 42(10): 3503.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Poduri and L.Q. Chen. Acta matter, 1998, 46(5): 1719-1729.

Google Scholar

[17] Mao Shufang, Chen Zheng, Wang Yongxin et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2009, 45(5): 630-634.

Google Scholar