Comparison between FEM and Experimental Results in the Upsetting of Nano-Structured Materials

C.J. Luis-Pérez; Ignacio Puertas; Daniel Salcedo; Javier León; Ivan Pérez

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.713.31

Paper Titles

Analysis of the Laser Weldability under Conduction Regime of 2024, 5083, 6082 and 7075 Aluminium Alloys
p.7

Analytical Approach to the Indentation Process. Application of the Upper Bound Element Technique
p.13

Application of Different Simulation Strategies for the Analysis of Multi-Stroke Localised-Incremental Forging Operations
p.19

Application of Laser Remelting Treatments to Improve the Properties of Ti6Al4V Alloy
p.25

Comparison between FEM and Experimental Results in the Upsetting of Nano-Structured Materials
p.31

Current Research Trends in Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Fiber Reinforced Composites
p.37

Customizing Food with an Additive Manufacturing Technology
p.43

Development of a Laser Hardening Simulation Method Including Material Characterization for Rapid Heating Rates
p.49

Effect of Electrolyte on the Surface Smoothness Obtained by Electropolishing of Stainless Steel
p.55

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 713Comparison between FEM and Experimental Results in...

Comparison between FEM and Experimental Results in the Upsetting of Nano-Structured Materials

Abstract:

Over recent years, some severe plastic deformation processes have been developed with the aim of obtaining a material with sub-micrometric or even nanometric grain size, such as: ECAE (Equal channel angular extrusion) and HPT (High pressure torsion) among many others. The main aim of this present study is to analyse the upsetting of the 5083 Al-Mg-Mn alloy, which had been previously deformed by ECAE. Different processing temperatures will be used and the final properties of the resulting material will be determined.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Non Conventional Materials Processing Technologies

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 713)

Pages:

31-36

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.713.31

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

C.J. Luis-Pérez, Ignacio Puertas, Daniel Salcedo, Javier León, Ivan Pérez

Keywords:

ECAE, Forging, Metal Forming, Nano-Structured Materials

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] T. Altan, G. Ngaile and G. Shen: Cold and hot forging: Fundamentals and applications (ASM International, Ohio 2005).

DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.chffa.9781627083003

Google Scholar

[2] J. Billigmann and H. D. Feldmann: Estampado y prensado a máquina (Ed. Reverté, Madrid 1979).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Douglas and D. Kuhlmann: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 98 (2000), p.182.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Z. Valiev, R. K. Islamgaliev, and I. V. Alexandrov: Prog. Mater. Sci. Vol. 45 (2000), p.103.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Huarte, C.J. Luis, I. Puertas, J. León and R. Luri: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 162–163 (2005), p.317.

Google Scholar

[6] W. R. D. Wilson, S. R. Schmid and J. Liu: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 155-156 (2004), p. (1912).

Google Scholar

[7] MSC Marc Mentat TM: Volumen A: Theory and user information (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Zhang, E. Felder and S. Bruschi: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 209 (2009), p.5720.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Luri, C. J. Luis, J. León and M. A. Sebastián: J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. -Trans. ASME Vol. 128 (2006), p.860.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Luri, C.J. Luis Pérez, D. Salcedo, I. Puertas, J. León, I. Pérez and J.P. Fuertes: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 211 (2011), p.48.

Google Scholar