Experimental Study on Face Milling Austenitic Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the characteristics of austenitic stainless steel 1Cr18Ni9Ti, aiming to decrease surface roughness and milling force orthogonal face milling experiment with four factors and four levels was designed to optimize machining parameters with consideration of material removal rate. Three relatively excellent machining parameters were taken to further figure out the influences of cutting speed on tool life, and the tool wear mechanism was also analyzed. The results indicated that both surface roughness and milling force were greatly influenced by cutting speed and feed. The best machining parameters obtained in the experiments were v: 200m/min, fz: 0.1mm/z, ap: 0.9mm, ae: 35mm. The main tool failure mode under this circumstance was tool chipping at the flank between main cutting edge and surface to be processed, besides, the wear of rake face was relatively slight.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

35-40

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.L. Endrino, G.S. Fox-Rabinovich and C. Gey: Surf. Coat. Tech. Vol. 200 (2006), p.6840

Google Scholar

[2] T.-R. Lin: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 19 (2002), pp.330-335

Google Scholar

[3] Yuan Ronghua, Sun Jie, Song Ge and Li Jianfeng: Tool Eng. Vol. 43 (2009), pp.18-21

Google Scholar

[4] Mohammad Reza Razfar, Reza Farshbaf Zinati and Mahdiar Haghshenas: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 52 (2011), pp.487-495

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2757-5

Google Scholar

[5] Shao Junjie, An Qinghong, Chen Ming: Tool Eng. Vol. 42 (2008), pp.25-28

Google Scholar

[6] W.Y.H. Liew and X. Ding: Wear. Vol. 265 (2008), p.165

Google Scholar

[7] Tsann-Rong Lin: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 79 (1998), pp.45-46

Google Scholar

[8] Tsann-Rong Lin: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 108 (2000), pp.18-20

Google Scholar

[9] Wang Rui, Liu Jia and Wang Xibin: Tool Eng. Vol. 39 (2005), p.26

Google Scholar