Intercrystalline Cracking of Austenitic Steel during Brazing

Abstract:

During brazing of austenitic stainless steel with copper based brazing material a common failure occurs, namely that the brazing material solutes along grain boundaries, which look like cracks. This unfortunate effect occurred when AISI 304 steel is brazed. To avoid this unwanted effect since the cracks propagate mainly on high angle grain boundaries our goal was to enhance the number of special coincident site lattice type grain boundaries with thermomechanical treatment. Experiments were performed for 1, 48 and 72 hour heat treatments at different level of cold rolled materials. After the thermomechanical treatment significant decrease in the crack size was found in depth and width, respectively. The grain boundaries were investigated on electro polished samples in an electron microscope with electron backscattered diffraction technique. The brazing was made with Boehler SG-CuSi3 brazing material.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 729)
• Pages: 442-447
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.729.442
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: Kornél Májlinger, Péter János Szabó
• Keywords: Austenitic Steel, Coincidence-Site Lattice, Copper Brazing, Electron Back Scatter Diffraction, Intercrystalline Cracking, Special Grain Boundaries

References

[1] J.R. Davis, Stainless Steels: An ASM Specialty Handbook ASM; New York, (1994).

[2] C. Hu, S. Xia, H. Li, T. Liu, B. Zhou, W. Chen, N. Wang, Improving the intergranular corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel by grain boundary network control. Corr. Sci. 53(5) (2011) 1880-1886.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.005

[3] Y. Zhou, K.T. Aust, U. Erb, G. Palumbo, Effects of grain boundary structure on carbide precipitation in 304L stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 45(1) (2001) 49-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(01)00990-3

[4] M. Kumar, A.J. Schwartz, W.E. King, Microstructural evolution during grain boundary engineering of low to medium stacking fault energy fcc materials. Acta Mater. 50(10) (2002) 2599-2612.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00090-3

[5] L. Tan, K. Sridharan, T.R. Allen, R.K. Nanstad, D.A. McClintock, Microstructure tailoring for property improvements by grain boundary engineering. J. Nucl. Mater. 374(1–2) (2008) 270-280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.08.015

[6] M. Shimada, H. Kokawa, Z.J. Wang, Y.S. Sato, I. Karibe, Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 50(9) (2002) 2331-2341.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00064-2

[7] S. Tsurekawa, S. Nakamichi, T. Watanabe, Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 54(13) (2006) 3617-3626.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.048

[8] M. Kurban, U. Erb, K.T. Aust, A grain boundary characterization study of boron segregation and carbide precipitation in alloy 304 austenitic stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 54(6) (2006) 1053-1058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.055

[9] W. Myrjam, Grain boundary engineering by application of mechanical stresses. Scripta Mater. 54(6) (2006) 987-992.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.042

[10] A.J. Schwartz, W.E. King, M. Kumar, Influence of processing method on the network of grain boundaries. Scripta Mater. 54(6) (2006) 963-968.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.052

[11] G. Vander Voort, S. Dillon, E. Manilova, Metallographic Preparation for Electron Backscattered Diffraction. Micros. Microanal. 12 (2006) 1610-1611.

DOI: 10.1017/s1431927606069327