The Strength and Ductility of 5483 Aluminium Alloy Processed by Various SPD Methods

Abstract:

Grain size refinement is an efficient way to improve mechanical strength and thus make light metals even lighter in terms of specific strength. However, the strength improvement is at the expense of ductility. Therefore, a better understanding of microstructural factors influencing both parameters is of prime importance for further development of ultrafine grained materials. In this work, we report results obtained for 5483 aluminium alloy which was subjected to several severe plastic deformation (SPD) methods, i.e. equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), Hydrostatic Extrusion (HE) and the combination of the two. Detailed microstructural analysis revealed significant difference in the grain size and grain boundary characteristics between samples obtained following different routes. It was found that although the grain size is a prime microstructural parameter determining mechanical strength, second order factors such as grain size distribution and distribution of grain boundary misorientation angles also play a significant role.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 765)
• Pages: 423-428
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.765.423
• Online since: July 2013
• Authors: Piotr Bazarnik, Barbara Romelczyk-Baishya, Mariusz Kulczyk, Małgorzata Lewandowska
• Keywords: Aluminium Alloy, ECAP, Grain Boundary, Hydrostatic Extrusion

References

[1] K.-D. Woo, S.-W. Kim, T.P. Lou, Mat. Sci. Eng., A 334 (2002) 157-261.

[2] M. Lewandowska, K.J. Kurzydłowski, Mater. Charact.  55 (2005) 395-401.

[3] A. Azushima, R. Kopp, A. Korhonen, D.Y. Yang, F. Micari, G.D. Lahoti, P. Groche, J. Yanagimoto, N. Tsuji, A. Rosochowski, A. Yanagida, CRIP Annals – Manuf. Tech. 57 (2008) 716-735.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.005

[4] K.J. Kurzydlowski, Mater. Sci. Forum 503-504 (2006) 341-348.

[5] M. Lewandowska, Solid State Phenomena 114 (2006) 109-116.

[6] M. Alizadeh, M.H. Paydar, J. Alloys Compd. 492 (2010) 231-235.

[7] H. Uzun, C. D. Donne, A. Argagnotto, T. Ghidini, C. Gambaro, Mater. Design 26 (2005) 41-46.

[8] A. Loucif, R.B. Figueiredo, T. Baudin, F. Brisset, R. Chemam, T.G. Langdon, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 532 (2012) 139-145.

[9] Y.S. Sato, Y. Kurihara, S.H.C. Park, H. Kokawa, N. Tsuji, Scripta Mater. 50 (2004) 57.

[10] P. Zhilyaev, G.V. Nurislamova, S. Suriñach, M.D. Barò, T.G. Langdon, Mater. Phys. Mech. 5 (2002) 23.

[11] N.D. Stepanov, A.V. Kuznetsov, G.A. Salishchev, G.I. Raab, R.Z. Valiev Mat. Sci. Eng. A 554 (2012) 105-115.

[12] P. Bazarnik, M. Lewandowska, M. Andrzejczuk, K.J. Kurzydlowski, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 556 (2012) 134-139.

[13] B. Zhu, R.J. Asaro, P. Krysl, K. Zhang, J.R. Weertman, Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 3307-3320.

[14] H.Y. Chao, Y. Yang, X. Wang, E.D. Wang, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 3428-3434.

[15] W.A. Swiatnicki, M.W. Grabski, Mat. Sci. Eng. 100 (1988) 93-100.

[16] N. Hansen, Scripta Mater. 51 (2004) 801-806.

[17] T.D. Topping, T. Hu, K. Manigandan, T.S. Srivatsan, E.J. Lavernia, Philos. Mag. (2012) 1-23.

[18] A.P. Newbery, B. Ahn, T.D. Topping, P.S. Pao, S.R. Nutt, E.J. Lavernia, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 203 (2008) 37-45.

[19] Z. Horita, T. Fujinami, M. Nemoto, T.G. Langdon, J. Mater. Process. Technol. (2001) 288-292.

[20] T.Hirata, T. Oguri, H. Hagino, T. Tanaka, S. W. Chung, Y. Takigawa, K. Higashi, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 456 (2007) 344-349.