An Almost User-Independent Evaluation Formalism to Determine Arbitrary Residual Stress Depth Distributions with the Hole-Drilling Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The incremental hole-drilling method is the method of choice to determine residual stress depth distributions with limited costs and minor destruction of the investigated component. With a spatial resolution of commonly two millimeters in diameter and one millimeter in depth especially the effects of frequently used surface treatments like e.g. shot peening or deep rolling can be reliably detected if the in depth residual stress gradients are relatively smooth. Nevertheless up to now the quantitative accuracy of the method is poor for residual stress analyses close to the materials surface up to depths of approximately 0.2 mm and in the case of steep in-depth residual stress gradients or oscillating residual stress depth distributions. In this paper, residual stress depth distributions of a broad range introduced by mechanical surface-treatments in flat specimens were analyzed with the hole-drilling method and compared with the results measured by X-ray diffraction as the reference. It comes out, that arbitrary residual stress depth distributions can be successfully determined with a modified differential evaluation formalism. For this purpose, often neglected well known weak points of the hole-drilling method were considered and improved, e.g. hole geometry, numerical calibration and data conditioning. Especially, the proposed strategy of data conditioning results in an almost user-independent evaluation formalism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Pages:

120-127

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Lu, J.F. Flavenot, Application of the incremental hole drilling method for the measurement of residual stress distribution in shot-peened components, Shot Peening Science Technology Application, DGM Frankfurt am Main (1987) 279-286.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-034062-3.50020-3

Google Scholar

[2] J. P. Nobre, M. Kornmeier, A. M. Dias and B. Scholtes, Use of the Hole-drilling Method for Measuring Residual Stresses in Highly Stressed Shot-peened Surfaces, Experimental Mechanics 40 (2000) 3 289-297.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02327502

Google Scholar

[3] T. Schwarz, Beitrag zur Eigenspannungsermittlung an isotropen, anisotropen sowie inhomogenen, schichtweise aufgebauten Werkstoffen mittels der Bohrlochmethode und Ringkernverfahren. Dissertation, MPA Stuttgart, (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] G. S. Schajer, Measurement of Non-uniform Residual Stress Using the Hole-drilling Method, ASME J. Eng. Mat. Tech., 110, 338-343, 344-349 (1988).

DOI: 10.1115/1.3226059

Google Scholar

[5] V. Fontanari, F. Frendo, T. Bortolamedi, P. Scardi Comparison of the hole-drilling and X-ray diffraction methods for measuring the residual stresses in shot-peened aluminium alloys, J. Strain Analysis 40 (2005) 2 199-209.

DOI: 10.1243/030932405x7791

Google Scholar

[6] J. Lord, P.V. Grant, A. Tony Fry, F.A. Kandil, A UK Residual Stress Intercomparison Exercise –Development of Measurement Good Practice for the XRD and Hole Drilling Techniques, Materials Science Forum (2002) 567-572.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.404-407.567

Google Scholar

[7] H. Wern, A new approach to triaxial residual stressevaluation by the hole drilling method, Strain (1997) 121-126.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1305.1997.tb01059.x

Google Scholar

[8] M. Bijak-Zochowski, A Semidestructive Method of Measuring Residual Stresses, VDI-Berichte (1978) 469-476.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Wern, Finite-element solutions for mechanical drilling methods: A new integral formalism. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 63 (1994) 365-372.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-0427(95)00089-5

Google Scholar

[10] A. Nau, B. Scholtes, Evaluation of the high-speed drilling technique for the incremental hole-drilling method. Experimental Mechanics, Experimental Mechanics, 2012, DOI 10. 1007/s11340-012-9641-1.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-012-9641-1

Google Scholar

[11] Späth H., Spline-Algorithmen zur Konstruktion glatter Kurven und Flächen, Oldenburg Verlag, München, (1978).

Google Scholar