Paper Titles

MCDM Model for Selection of Optimum Machining Process
p.348

Development of Data Acquisition System for Examination of Grinding Performance
p.355

Elementary Research on Preparation of AlB₁₂ Powder by Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis (SHS)
p.365

Mechanism of Variable Helix Tools in Suppressing Chatter Using Process Damping for Machining Titanium Alloys at Low Cutting Speed
p.370

Surface Roughness Analysis of Magnesium Pieces Obtained by Intermittent Turning
p.377

Prototype Design of Wire-Sawing Machine for Preliminary Experiments to Lunar and Planetary Exploration
p.392

Running Behavior of a High-Speed Spindle Using a Micro-Mist Lubrication System
p.400

Tool Wear and Surface Roughness when Machining AlSi/AlN Metal Matrix Composite Using Uncoated Carbide Cutting Tool
p.409

Design, Fabrication and Properties of Textured Self-Lubricated Tools in Dry Cutting
p.414

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 773-774Surface Roughness Analysis of Magnesium Pieces...

Surface Roughness Analysis of Magnesium Pieces Obtained by Intermittent Turning

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental study to analyze the surface roughness reached in pieces of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy obtained by intermittent turning. A design of experiments (DOE) was established to carry out the study. Namely, factors identified as posible sources of variation of the surface roughness and their levels, written between parentheses, are the following: depth of cut (1), feed rate (2), spindle speed (2), type of tool (2), quantity of lubrication (3), type of interruption (3), measurement length (3) and measurement generatrice (3). Due to the high number of possible combinations that can be generated with the set of factors and levels identified a combined design of experiments L₄x3² was performed. Data are was analyzed by means of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. The main results of the statistical analysis highlight the great influence of the feed rate on surface roughness among the set of factors and their interactions considered. In addition, focusing on the intermittent cutting, type of interruption and its interaction with the type of tool used are also important sources of variation, but at a lower level than feed rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies XV

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 773-774)

Pages:

377-391

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.773-774.377

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2013

Authors:

Eva María Rubio, María Villeta, Beatriz de Agustina, Diego Carou

Keywords:

ANOVA, Intermittent Cutting, Magnesium UNS M11917, Surface Roughness (SR)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. L. Mordike, T. Eber, Magnesium. Properties – applications – potential, Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 302(1) (2001) 37-45.

[2] K. Funatani, Emerging technology in surface modification of light metals, Surf. Coat.Tech. 133-134 (2000) 264-272.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(00)00940-3

[3] M. Kleiner, M. Geiger, A. Klaus, Manufacturing of lightweight components by metal forming, CIRP Ann.– Manufact. Techn. 52(2) (2003) 521-542.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60202-9

[4] J. E. Gray, B. Luan, J. Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys - a critical review, Alloy Compd. 336(1-2) (2002) 88-113.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(01)01899-0

[5] A. E. Diniz, D. M. Gomes, A. Jr. Braghini, Turning of hardened steel with interrupted and semi-interrupted cutting, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 159(2) (2005) 240-248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.011

[6] A. J. Oliveira, A. E. Diniz, D. J. Ursolino, Hard turning in continuous and interrupted cut with PCBN and whisker-reinforced cutting tolos, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209(12-13) (2009) 5262-5270.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.012

[7] H. Chandrasekaran, H. Thoors, Tribology in interrupted machining: role of interruption cycle and work material, Wear. 179(1-2) (1994) 83-88.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(94)90223-2

[8] H. K. Tönshoff, W. Kaestnerand, R. Schnadt, Machinability of forged steels in interrupted cutting, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 21(2) (1990) 219-236.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(90)90007-h

[9] ASTM International, Editor: Bearing Steel Technology. STP 1419, ASTM International, Philadelphia, 2002.

[10] K. Weinert, I. Inasaki, J. W. Sutherland, T. Wakabayashi, Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication, CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Techn. 53(2) (2004) 511-537.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60027-4

[11] O. W. Boston, W. W. Gilbert, Influence on tool life and power of nose radius, chamfer and peripheral cutting edge angle when face milling a 40000 psi cast iron, Trans. ASME. 69 (1947) 117-124.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4017310

[12] M. Stanford, P. M. Lister, K. A. Kibble, Investigation into the effect of cutting environment on tool life during the milling of a BS970-080A15 (En32b) low carbon Steel, Wear. 262(11-12) (2007) 1496-1503.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.033

[13] H. K. Tönshoff, H. G. Wobker, C. Cassel. Wear characteristics of cermet cutting tolos, CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Techn. 43(1) (1994) 89-92.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62171-4

[14] S. M. Bhatia, P. C. Pandey, H. S. Shah, Thermal cracking of carbide tools during intermittent cutting, Wear. 51(2) (1978) 201-211.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(78)90260-0

[15] H. Chandrasekaran, Thermal fatigue in tool carbides and its relevance to milling cutters, CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Techn. 34(1) (1985) 125-128.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61739-9

[16] N. N. Zorev, Machining steel with a carbide tipped tool in intermittent heavy cutting conditions, Russ. Eng. J. 43(2) (1963) 43-47.

[17] N. N. Zorev, K. A. Sawiaskin, Carbide tool life at interrupted cut with continuous cycles, CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Techn. 18(3) (1969) 555-562.

[18] P. M. Braiden, D. S. Dugdale, Failure of carbide tools in intermittent cutting, in Iron and Steel Institure (Ed.), Materials for metal cutting. Proceedings of the Conference on Materials for Metal Cutting, London: Iron and Steel Institute., Scarborough, 1970, pp.30-34.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-679x(70)90021-6

[19] I. Yellowley, G. Barrow, The influence of thermal cycling on tool life in peripheral milling, Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 16(1) (1976) 1-12.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7357(76)90009-3

[20] A. J. Pekelharing, The exit failure of cemented carbide face-milling cutters: Part I. Fundamentals and phenomena, CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Techn. 33(1) (1984) 47-50.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61377-8

[21] C. A. van Luttervelt, H. R. Willemse, The exit failure of cemented carbide face milling cutters Part II - Testing of commercial cutters, CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Techn. 33(1) (1984) 51-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61378-x

[22] A. E. Diniz, J. C. Filho, Influence of the relative positions of tool and workpiece on tool life, tool wear and surface finish in the face milling process, Wear. 232(1) (1999) 67-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00159-3

[23] G. S. Andreev, Contact stresses in intermittent cutting process, Russ. Eng. J. 49(3) (1969) 70-74.

[24] G. S. Andreev, Efficiency of cutting tools in intermittent cutting conditions, Russ. Eng. J. 54(1) (1974) 54.

[25] E. Kuljanic, An investigation of wear in single-tooth and multi-tooth milling, Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 14(1) (1974) 95-109.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7357(74)90014-6

[26] S. M. Bhatia, P. C. Pandey, H. S. Shah, Failure of cemented carbide tools in intermittent cutting, Precis. Eng., 1(3) (1979) 148-152.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-6359(79)90041-2

[27] G. S. Andreev. Effect of thermal and adhesion phenomena on tool life in interrupted machining. Russ. Eng. J., 54(10) (1974) 70-73.

[28] Y. G. Kabaldin, Chip-tool adhesion in intermittent cutting, Mach. Tool, 44(4) (1973) 56-58.

[29] I. Yellowley, G. Barrow, The assessment of tool life in peripheral milling, in: MacMillan (Ed.), Advances in Machine Tool Design and Research, Proceedings of the 19th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, MacMillan, London, 1978, pp.443-452.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-81412-1_52

[30] T. Hoshi, K. Okushima. Optimum diameter and positions of fly cutter for milling steel at light cuts, J. Eng. Ind.–Trans. ASME. 87(4) (1965) 442-446.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3670859

[31] E. O. Ezugwu, S. H. Tang, Surface abuse when machining cast iron and nickel base superalloy (inconel 718) with ceramic tools, in: D. Browne (Ed.), Proceedings of 9th Conference of the Irish Manufacturing Committee, 1992, pp.436-450.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01786-0

[32] G. Taguchi, System of experimental design, American Supplier Institute, New York, 1987.

[33] D. C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2005.

[34] E. M. Rubio, A. M. Camacho, J. M. Sánchez-Sola, M. A. Sebastián, M. Marcos, Surface roughness of AA7050 alloy turned bars. Analysis of the influence of the length of machining, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 162- 163C (2005) 682-689.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.096

[35] E. Sayit, K. Aslantas, A. Çiçek, Tool wear mechanism in interrupted cutting conditions, Mater. Manuf. Process. 24 (2009) 476-483.

DOI: 10.1080/10426910802714423

[36] ANSI/ASME, B46.1-2009, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2010.

[37] E. M. Rubio, J. M. Sáenz de Pipaón, M.Villeta, M. A. Sebastián, Experimental study for improving repair operations of pieces of magnesium UNS M11311 obtained by dry turning, Proceedings of the 12 CIRP Conference on Modelling of Machining, in: P. J. Arrazola (Ed.), pp.819-826.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.264-265.967