Comparative Study on Life Cycle Assessment for Typical Building Thermal Insulation Materials in China

Abstract:

Studies on life cycle assessment of three typical building thermal insulation materials including polystyrene board, rock wool board, and rigid foam polyurethane board related to building energy-saving were carried out. Based on the method of life cycle assessment, "1 kg of thermal insulation material" is first selected as one of the functional units in this study based on the production field data statistics and general market transaction rules of the thermal insulation materials, and life cycle resource consumption, energy consumption and exhaust emission of the three products in China are deeply surveyed and analyzed. The abiotic depletion potential (ADP), primary energy demand (PED), and global warming potential (GWP) for production of 1 kg of the three thermal insulation materials are calculated and analyzed. Furthermore, the functional unit is extended to be "1 m² of thermal insulation material meeting the same energy-saving requirements" so as to compare the difference of environmental friendliness among the three building thermal insulation materials, and the corresponding life cycle environmental impact is also calculated and analyzed. As shown by the results, where calculated in unit mass, the order of production life cycle environmental impact significances of the thermal insulation materials is as follows: rock wool board < polyurethane board < polystyrene board. However, where calculated in unit area (m²) meeting the 65% energy-saving requirements, the production life cycle environmental impact significances of the three kinds of insulation materials are sorted as polystyrene board < polyurethane board < rock wool board, whatever the region is, which is opposite with that of the results for the insulation materials in unit mass (kg). The reason for such difference is that they have different volume weights and heat conductivity coefficients. The polystyrene board has a smaller volume weight and the smallest heat conductivity coefficient, whereas the rock wool board has the highest volume weight and heat conductivity coefficient. Source of the project fund. Subject "the Research and Application of Life Cycle Assessment Technology to the Building Materials for Building Engineering in Typical Regions" of the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (No.: 2011BAJ04B06)

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 787)
• Pages: 176-183
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.787.176
• Online since: April 2014
• Authors: Li Ping Ma*, Quan Jiang, Ping Zhao, Chun Zhi Zhao
• Keywords: Life Cycle Assessment, Polystyrene Board, Rigid Foam Polyurethane Board, Rock Wool Board

References

[1] National Standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24040-2008. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Frameworks [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008.

[2] National Standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24044-2008. Environmental Management - Life Cycle assessment - Requirements and Guidelines [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008.

[3] National Standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24062-2009. Environmental Management - Integrating Environmental Aspects into Product Design and Development [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, (2009)

[4] National Standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24025-2009. Environmental Labels and Declarations - Type Ⅲ Environmental Declarations - Principles and Procedures [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, (2009)

DOI: 10.3403/30101513u

[5] Wei Xiaoqing, Analysis and Assessment of Energy Consumption of Large-scale Public Buildings Based on Life Cycle Theory [D]. Changsha: Hunan University; 2010.

[6] Yan Yan. Research of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission of Buildings in Zhejiang Province Based on Life Cycle Assessment [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.

[7] Gu Lijing. Studies on the Environmental Impact of the Building Industry in China Based on the Life Cycle Assessment [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2009.

[8] Laukaitis A, Zurauskas R, Kerien J. The effect of foam polystyrene granules on cement composite properties. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2005,27(1):41-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.09.004

[9] EN 1606 A1 2006 E. Thermal insulating products for building applications determanation of compressive creep. European Committee for Standardisation, 2006.

[10] IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [M]. IPCC/IGES, Hayama, Japan, 2006.

[11] Liu Xialu etc. Method and Basic Model for Development of Chinese Reference Life Cycle Database [J]. Journal of Environmental Science. 2010, 30(10):2136-2144.

[12] Wang H T, Ciroth A, etal. Development of unit process datasets // UNEP/SETAC. Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. Paris: UNEP, 2011.

[13] Wang H T, Hou P, et al. A Novel Weighting Method in LCIA and its Application in Chinese Policy Context// Matthias Finkbeiner. Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management. Berlin: Springer, 2011: 65-72.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_7

[14] Professional Standard of the People's Republic of China. JGJ 26-2010. Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings in Severe Cold and Cold Zones [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2010.

DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/29/20231348

[15] Professional Standard of the People's Republic of China. JGJ 134-2010. Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2010.