Properties of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete has been used in the construction industry since long times. It is probably the most widely used construction material in the world, largely due to the abundance of the raw materials for cement manufacture, low relative cost and the versatility and adaptability of concrete in forming various structural shapes. Massive production of concrete and the associated substantial manufacture of cement have however been observed to have a very negative impact. One of the biggest issues of growing concern at the moment faced by concrete industries is the impact of cement production on the environment. The production of cement not only depletes significant amount of natural resources, but also liberates a considerable amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as a result of decarbonation of limestone and the combustion of fossil fuels. In addition, cement is among the most energy intensive construction materials, after aluminium and steel [1].

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

99-109

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hardjito, D. and Rangan, B.V., Development and Properties of Low-Calcium Fly ash based Geopolymer Concrete, Research Report GC-1, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia; (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Malhotra, V.M., Role of Supplementary Cementing Materials and Superplasticizers in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Proceedings of ICFRC International Conference on Fiber Composites, High-Performance Concrete, and Smart Materials, Chennai, India, January 2004, pp.489-499.

Google Scholar

[3] Naik, T.R., Sustainability of cement and concrete industries, Proceedings of the International Conference Global Construction: Ultimate Concrete Opportunities, Dundee, Scotland, July 2005, pp.141-150.

DOI: 10.1680/asic.34044.0017

Google Scholar

[4] Malhotra, V.M., Introduction: Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, ACI Concrete International, 24 (7): 2002, p.22.

Google Scholar

[5] Rangan, B.V., Fly ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Research Report GC-4, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia; (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] Davidovits, J., Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 2nd edition, Institut Geopolymer, Saint-Quentin, France, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Druta, C., Tensile Strength and Bonding Characteristics of Self-Compacting Concrete, MS Thesis, Department of Engineering Science, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, (2003).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.4228

Google Scholar

[8] EFNARC, The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production and Use, (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] Liu, M., Self-compacting concrete with different levels of pulverized fuel ash, Construction and Building Materials, 24 (2010), p.1245–1252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.012

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM C 618-05, Standard Specification for Coal Fly ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use as Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04, no. 02, (2005).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-15

Google Scholar

[11] BS EN 450-1: 2005, Fly ash for concrete - Part 1: Definition, specifications and conformity criteria, British-Adopted European Standard, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] EFNARC, Specification and Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete, Norfolk, UK: European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems, February (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] BS EN 12390-3: 2002, Testing hardened concrete – part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens; (2002).

Google Scholar

[14] BS EN 12390-6: 2000, Testing hardened concrete – part 6: Tensile Splitting strength of test specimens; (2000).

DOI: 10.3403/30200045

Google Scholar

[15] BS EN 12390-5: 2000, Testing hardened concrete – part 5: Flexural Strength of test specimens, (2000).

Google Scholar

[16] Palomo, A., Grutzeck, M. W., Blanco, M. T., Alkali-activated fly ashes – A cement for the future, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 8, 1999, p.1323–1329.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00243-9

Google Scholar

[17] Khale, D., Chaudhary, R., Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review, Journal of Material Science, vol. 42, no. 3, 2007, p.729–746.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4

Google Scholar

[18] Petermann, J. C., Saeed, A., Hammons, M. I., Alkal-activated geopolymers: A litterature review, AFRL-RX-TY-TR-2010-0097, Contract No. FA4819-07-D-0001, July 2010 88ABW-2012-2030, 6 February (2012).

Google Scholar

[19] Sofi, M., van Deventer, J. S. J., Mendis, P. A., Lukey, G. C., Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs), Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 37, 2007, p.251–257.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.008

Google Scholar

[20] Neville A.M., Properties of concrete, 4th Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, (1996).

Google Scholar

[21] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318R-08, American Concrete Institute, Farmingtion Hills, MI, (2008).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[22] ACI Committee 363, State of the art report on high-strength concrete, ACI363R-92, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, (1992).

Google Scholar

[23] Euro code 2, Design of Concrete Structures part 1-1. London: (BS EN 1992-1-1: 2004), 2004, pp.27-36.

Google Scholar

[24] Felekoglu, B., Turkel, S., and Baradan, B., Effect of water/cement ratio on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete, Building and Environmental, 42 (4): 2007, pp.1795-1802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.012

Google Scholar

[25] Parra, C., Valcuende, M., Gómez, F., Splitting tensile strength and Modulus of elasticity of selfcompacting concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 25(2011), pp.201-207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.037

Google Scholar