Assessment to the Solid to Liquid Ratios on the Soil Strength and Water Absorption of the Kedah’s Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to assess the solid to liquid ratios on the compressive strength and water absorption of Kedah’s soil by using geopolymerization method. Fly ash and soft soil were mixed with alkaline activators namely sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) for preparing stabilize the soil sample. The geopolymerization process for soil stabilization was synthesized by the activation of fly ash and soil with alkaline solution at four different solid to liquid ratios which were 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 at a specific constant ratio of Na2SiO3/NaOH solution of 0.5. The compressive strength up to 4.77 MPa was obtained at 3.0 of solid to liquid ratio and the water absorption has become increasingly lower to 2.28% as the ratio of solid to liquid increases in 7 days curing at room temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

59-64

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Zhang, H. Guo, T. El-Korchi, G. Zhang and M. Tao, Construction and Building Materials Vol. 47 (2013), p.1468.

Google Scholar

[2] E.J. Den Haan, in: Recent Advance in Soft Soil Engineering, edited by Huat & Bahia, Kuching, Sarawak (1997), in press.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Cristelo, S. Glendinning, T. Miranda, D. Oliveira, Silva, R., Construction and Building Materials Vol. 36 (2012), p.727.

Google Scholar

[4] O.S. Olaniyan, R.A. Olaoye, O.M. Okeyinka, D.B. Olaniyan, Internal Journal of Civil & Environment Engineering IJCEE-IJENS Vol. 11 (2011), p.6.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Davidovits, Journal of Materials Education Vol. 16 (1994), p.91.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Davidovits, Journal of Thermal Analysis Vol. 35 (1989), p.429.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Xu, J.S.J. Van Deventer, International Journal of Mineral Processing Vol. 59 (2000), p.247.

Google Scholar

[8] K., Komnitsas, D. Zaharaki, Minerals Engineering Vol. 20 (2007), p.1261.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Duxson, J.L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, J.S.J. van Deventer, Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 37 (2007), p.1590.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018

Google Scholar

[10] P. Chindaprasirt, T. Chareerat, V. Sirivivatnanon, Cement & Concrete Composites Vol. 29 (2007), p.224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002

Google Scholar

[11] R. Cioffi, L. Maffucci, L. Santoro, Resources Conservation and Recycling Vol. 40 (2003), p.27.

Google Scholar

[12] N. Cristelo, S. Glendinning, L. Fernandes, A. T. Pinto, Acta Geotechnica (2013), p.1.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Dayakar Babu, K. Ramu, S. Durga Prasad, K Ashok Kumar, Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference (2013).

Google Scholar

[14] J.D. McKinley, H. R. Thomas, K.P. Williams, J.M. Reid, Engineering Geology Vol 60 (2001), p.181.

Google Scholar

[15] IAEG (1981). Commission on Engineering Geological Mapping.

Google Scholar

[16] Britis Standards Instituition (1990). Part 2, Classification tests, BS1377, London.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Marto, N. Latifi, H. Sohaei, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Vol 18 (2013), p.521.

Google Scholar

[18] W.I. Wan Mastura, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, V.S. Andrei, H. Kamarudin, G.S. Ioan, I. Khairul Nizar, A.K. Aeslina, M. Binhussain, Revista de Chimie, Vol 56 (2014),  p.1340.

Google Scholar

[19] ASTM C642-06, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, (2006) ASTM International, United States.

Google Scholar

[20] O.A. Abdul Kareem, M.M.A.B. Abdullah, K. Hussin, K.N. Ismail, M. BinHussain, Materials Vol 6 (2013), p.4450.

Google Scholar