Performance of Blended Fly Ash (FA) and Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) Geopolymer Mortar in Acidic Peat Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents performance of blended geopolymer mortars prepared from fly ash (FA) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA). Both materials are used their Si and Al elements were activated by alkaline solution. The alkaline solution was prepared by mixing sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide. The optimum mix proportion of geopolymer mortar with FA:POFA mass ratio was 90:10. The ratio of sodium silicate solution to sodium hydroxide solution by mass was 2.5:1. The mass ratio of sand to blended ashes was 2.75:1. The mortar specimens were prepared using 5×5×5 cm cube and cured at room temperature (28oC) for 3 days before subsequently heat-cured at 110oC for 24 hours. The specimens were immersed in distilled water and peat water with pH 4-5 for 120 days. The compressive strength change, porosity, and sorptivity tests were taken. In general, the results shows there was a decrease in strength, an increase in porosity and sorptivity of the blended geopolymer mortars. Fourier Transform Infra Red (FTIR) test revealed that interaction of geopolymers mortar with the acidic peat water can also cause replacement of the exchangeable cations (Na, K) in polymers by hidrogen or hydronium ions. Formation of some new zeolitic phases in blended FA-POFA geopolymer mortar exposed to acidic peat water were observed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

83-89

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Wibowo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 7 (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] P.J. Spedding: Fuel Vol 67 (1988) p.883.

Google Scholar

[3] Irianto. Kinetics of Color Degradation and Peat Water Organic Content using Peat Clay using Batch System (Research Report, PAU ITB, 1998).

Google Scholar

[4] V. Zivica: Construction and Building Materials Vol 20 (2006) p.634.

Google Scholar

[5] R. McCaffrey: Global Cement and Lime Magazine (2002) p.15.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Olivia, and H. Nikraz: Materials and Design Vol 36 (2011) p.191.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Davidovits: J Therm Anal Vol 37 (1991) p.1633.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Bakharev: Cement and Concrete Research Vol 35 (2005) p.658.

Google Scholar

[9] M.A.R. Bhutta, N. F. Ariffin., M.W. Hussin., and N.H.A.S. Lim: Jurnal Teknologi Vol 61 (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Ariffin, M. Azreen., M.W. Hussin., and M.A.R. Bhutta: Construction and Building Materials Vol 43 (2013) p.80.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Hall: Magazine of Concrete Research Vol 41 (1989) p.51.

Google Scholar

[12] Shindunata. A Conceptual Model of Geopolymerisation. (The University of Melbourne, Australia 2006).

Google Scholar

[13] M. Olivia, U.A. Hutapea., I.R. Sitompul., L Darmayanti., A. Kamaldi., and Z. Djauhari, in: The 6th International Conference of Asian Concrete Federation (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] F. Papworth, and W. Grace, in: Concrete 85. Concrete Institute of Australia (1985).

Google Scholar

[15] V.F. F Barbosa, K.J.D. MacKenzie, and C. Thaumaturgo: International Jurnal Inorganic Material Vol 2 (2000) p.309.

Google Scholar

[16] P. Duxson, S.W. Mallicoat, G.C. Lukey, W.M. Kriven, J.S.J. van Deventer: Colloids Surf A Vol 292 (2007) p.8.

Google Scholar

[17] D.W. Breck: Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry and Use. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1974).

Google Scholar

[18] K. Chakarova, and K. Hadjiivanov. Chem Commun Vol 47 (2011) p.1878.

Google Scholar

[19] N. Ranjbar, M. Mehdi M, B. Arash, A. U. Jhonson, and J. M. Zamin: Materials and Design Vol 59 (2014) p.532.

Google Scholar