Flexural Strength of Low Calcium Class F Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete in Long Term Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper reports on experimental work that has been undertaken to investigate the flexural strength performance of fly ash-based geopolymer (FG) concrete. The FG concrete was prepared using low calcium class F fly ash with high silicate content. The flexural strength properties of FG were assessed using modulus of rupture test up to the age of 360 days. Compressive strength and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) tests were also performed to corroborate the flexural strength test results. The results showed that the FG concrete demonstrates a comparable compressive strength and velocity to OPC concrete. Hewever, the flexural strength of FG concrete exhibited a better performance compared to that OPC concrete. The measured flexural strength of FG concrete also exhibited a higher value compared to the predicted one using ACI 318M-08 standard. The relationship between flexural strength with compressive strength demonstrated a similarity behavior to that OPC concrete. Thus, it can be concluded that the use of the ACI standard can be applied conservatively to determine the flexural strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

104-110

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Davidovits, J.: World Resource Review Vol. 6 (2) (1994), pp.263-278.

Google Scholar

[2] Berry, M., D. Cross, and J. Stephens, in: World of Coal Ash (WOCA), Lexington, KY, USA (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Gartner, E.: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 34 (2004), pp.1489-1498.

Google Scholar

[4] Hardjito, D., et al.: ACI Materials Journal Vol. November - December (2004), pp.467-472.

Google Scholar

[5] Rangan, B.V., et al.: Materials Forum Vol. 30 (2006), pp.170-175.

Google Scholar

[6] Diaz-Loya, E.I., E.N. Allouche, and S. Vaidya: ACI Materials Journal Vol. May - June (2011), pp.300-306.

Google Scholar

[7] Neupane, K., et al., in: Concrete in Australia magazine, edited by Concrete Institute of Australia, Australia (2014), pp.50-56.

Google Scholar

[8] ASTM International: ASTM C618-03 (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] Adam, A.A.: Dissertation, School of Civil, Environment and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM International: ASTM C109/C109M-07 (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM International: ASTM C78-02 (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM International: ASTM C597-02 (2003).

Google Scholar

[13] American Concrete Institute: ACI 318M-08 (2011).

Google Scholar

[14] Bakharev, T.: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 35 (2005), pp.1224-1232.

Google Scholar

[15] Yaman, I.O., et al.: ACI Materials Journal Vol. November - December (2001), pp.450-457.

Google Scholar

[16] Fernandez-Jimenez, A., A. Palomo, and C. Lopez-Hombrados: ACI Materials Journal Vol. March - April (2006), pp.106-112.

Google Scholar