Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicle Power Battery

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this paper analyzes the total energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHGs), NOx, SOx and PM emissions during material production and battery production processes of nickel-metal hydride battery (NiMH), lithium iron phosphate battery (LFP), lithium cobalt dioxide battery (LCO) and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) battery, assuming that the batteries have same energy capacity. The results showed that environmental performance of LFP battery was better than the other three, and that of NiMH battery was the worst. The experimental results also showed the total energy consumption of LFP battery was 2.8 times of NiMH battery and GHGs emission was 3.2 times during material production, and the total energy consumption was 7.6 times of NIMH battery and GHGs emission was 6.6 times during battery production

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

403-410

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yu Huaqing. Life cycle assessment of electrolytic nickel production. Kunming University of Science and Technology, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] Sakai T, Yoshinaga H, Miyamura H, et al. Rechargeable hydrogen batteries using rare-earth-based hydrogen storage alloys. Journal of alloys and compounds, 180 (1992) 37-54.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-8388(92)90361-c

Google Scholar

[3] Lascelles K, Morgan L G, Nicholls D. Nickel compounds. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, (2005).

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Shoubing, Yang Jianxing. Life cycle assessment method and progress. Shanghai environmental science, 17 (1998) 7-10.

Google Scholar

[5] Fan Qingxing, Ao Hongguang, Meng Chao. Life cycle assessment. Environmental science and management, 32 (2007) 177-180.

Google Scholar

[6] Sun Qihong, Wan Nianqing, Fan Yuhua. Life cycle assessment (LCA) study of abroad. World standardization and quality management, 12(2000) 24-26.

Google Scholar

[7] Matheys J, Timmermans J M, Van Mierlo J, et al. Comparison of the environmental impact of five electric vehicle battery technologies using LCA. International Journal of sustainable manufacturing, 1 (2009) 318-329.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsm.2009.023977

Google Scholar

[8] Schexnayder S M, Das S, Dhingra R, et al. Environmental evaluation of new generation vehicles and vehicle components. Engineering Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Lab., US Dept. of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, (2001).

DOI: 10.2172/768256

Google Scholar

[9] Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins T R, Strømman A H. Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environmental science & technology, 45 (2011) 4548-4554.

DOI: 10.1021/es103607c

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Hong, Li Jing, Wang Jun. Local development and application of life cycle assessment. North Environment, 9 (2011) 33-33.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhou Zupeng, Jiang Zhansi. Gap analysis of life cycle assessment between domestic and abroad. Combination machine tools and automatic processing technology, 1 (2013) 12-13.

Google Scholar

[12] Bai Lu, Sun Qihong, Qiao Qi. Review of life cycle assessment development progress. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 5 (2010) 2553-2555.

Google Scholar

[13] Dunn J B, Gaines L, Barnes M, et al. Material and energy flows in the materials production, assembly, and end-of-life stages of the automotive lithium-ion battery life cycle. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), (2012).

DOI: 10.2172/1044525

Google Scholar

[14] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. (2007).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511721731.009

Google Scholar

[15] P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D. W. Fahey, J. Haywood, & J. Lean, et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In Climate Change VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, (2007).

Google Scholar

[16] Matheys J, Van Autenboer W, Timmermans J M, et al. Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12 (2007) 191-196.

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.04.322

Google Scholar

[17] Wang Zhicheng. Electric vehicles and power battery. Journal of information science and technology, (1995) 1-7.

Google Scholar

[18] Hu Xingguo. Power battery technology and application. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Publishing House, (2009).

Google Scholar

[19] Li Yixia. Life cycle assessment of power battery. Beijing University of Technology, (2012).

Google Scholar

[20] Zackrisson M, Avellán L, Orlenius J. Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles–Critical issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (2010) 1519-1529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.004

Google Scholar

[21] Notter D A, Gauch M, Widmer R, et al. Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environmental science & technology, 44 (2010) 6550-6556.

DOI: 10.1021/es903729a

Google Scholar

[22] China power yearbook editing committee. China power yearbook 2013. Beijing: China power press, (2013).

Google Scholar