Application of Simplified Mathematical Model on Gas Scrubbing Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper shows common research activities of the Chemical Engineering team from the Institute of Materials Chemistry of the Faculty of Chemistry in Brno, University of Technology, Czech Republic. The paper is focused on application of simplified mathematical model on the experimental data obtained through the carbon dioxide scrubbing in to the deionized water in the experimental gas scrubber. The MS Excel’s (2007) Solver was used for computing simplified mathematical model of gas absorption under unsteady state. The CO2 used for the experiment was of the food quality. 24.675 liters of the deionized water was used as water quantity batch. Absorbed CO2 was detected with the gas electrode.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

147-152

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Dvořák, et al. Incineration and gasification technologies completed with up-to-date off-gas cleaning system for meeting environmental limits, In Clean technologies and environmental policy. 11 (2009) 95–105.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-008-0170-7

Google Scholar

[2] R. Idem P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Preface for the Special Issue on the Capture of Carbon Dioxide From Industrial Sources: Technological Developments and Future Opportunities, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 45 (2006) 2413.

DOI: 10.1021/ie0680019

Google Scholar

[3] K. H. Javed, T. Mahmud, E. Purba, The CO2 capture performance of a high-intensity vertex spray scrubber, Chemical Engineering journal. 162 (2010) 448–456.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.038

Google Scholar

[4] CH. Pao-Chi, et al. Scrubbing of CO2 greenhouse gases, accompanied by precipitation in a continuous bubble-column scrubber, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 47 (2006) 2522–2530.

DOI: 10.1021/ie070324x.s001

Google Scholar

[5] M. T. Ho, G. Leamon, G. W. Allison, D. E. Wiley, Economics of CO2 and mixed gas geosequestration of flue gas using gas separation membranes, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 8 (2006) 2546–2552.

DOI: 10.1021/ie050549c

Google Scholar

[6] H. Th. J. Reijers, et al. Hydrotalcite as CO2 sorbent for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 8 (2006) 2522–2530.

DOI: 10.1021/ie050563p

Google Scholar

[7] P. Pitter, Hydrochemie, fourth revised ed., VŠCHT, Prague, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, Revised 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] CH. Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (Includes Unit Operations), fourth edition, Prentice Hall Press, New Jersey, (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] P. A. Johnson, A. L. Babb, Liquid Diffusion Of Non-Electrolytes, Chemical Reviews. 56 (1956) 387–453.

DOI: 10.1021/cr50009a001

Google Scholar

[11] E. L. McCabe, J. C. Smith, P. Harriott, Unit operations of Chemical Ingineering, fifth edition, Chemical Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, USA, (1993).

Google Scholar

[12] W. K. Lewis, W. G. Whitman, Principles of Gas Absorption, Industrial \& Engineering Chemistry. 16 (1924) 1215–1220.

DOI: 10.1021/ie50180a002

Google Scholar

[13] R. Higbie, The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure, Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. 31 (1935) 365–389.

Google Scholar

[14] P. V. Danckwerts, Significance of Liquid-Film Coefficients in Gas Absorption, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 43 (1951) 1460–1467.

DOI: 10.1021/ie50498a055

Google Scholar

[15] H. L. Toor, J. M. Marchello, Film-penetration model for mass and heat transfer, American Institute of Chemical Engineers journal. 4 (1958) 97–101.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690040118

Google Scholar

[16] J. C. Lamont, D. S. Scott, An eddy cell model of mass transfer into the surface of a turbulent liquid, American Institute of Chemical Engineers journal. 16 (1970) 513–519.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690160403

Google Scholar

[17] P. D. Vaidya, E. Y. Kenig, Gas-Liquid kinetics: A review of determination methods, Chemical Engineering Communications. 194 (2007) 1543–1565.

DOI: 10.1080/00986440701518314

Google Scholar