Durability of Red Mud Based Geopolymer Paste in Acid Solutions

Abstract:

The present investigation is on the effect of red mud on the mechanical properties and durability of the geopolymer paste in sulphuric and acetic acid solution. Red mud and fly ash were used to form the geopolymer paste along with the alkalies. The variation of red mud in the paste composition was from 0% to 90%. Cylindrical shaped specimens of 1 inch diameter and 1 inch height were prepared. The specimens were immersed in 5% sulphuric acid and 5% acetic acid for 1, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 days and tested for weight loss, visual deformation, strength loss and colour of the solvent, based on the procedure specified by ASTM C 267 – 01. SEM/EDX Tests were performed on the geopolymer specimens. Test results show that initially, the strength of the geopolymer increased upon the addition of red mud. The strength was maximum when the percentage of red mud was 30%. The maximum strength obtained was 38 MPa for the paste containing 30% red mud using 10M alkali solution as against 31.69 MPa, when only fly ash was used. Geopolymer paste containing 30% and 50% red mud showed better resistance to acid attack. The strength loss was minimum for the samples containing 30% red mud in both inorganic and organic acid i.e. sulphuric and acetic acid.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 866)
• Pages: 99-105
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.866.99
• Online since: August 2016
• Authors: Smita Singh*, M.U. Aswath, R.V. Ranganath
• Keywords: Acetic Acid, Alkaline Liquids, Fly Ash, Red Mud, Silica Fume, Sulphuric Acid

References

[1] I. Giannopoulou, D. Dimas, I. Maragkos, D. Panias, Utilization of Metallurgical solid by-products for the development of Inorganic Polymeric Construction Materials, National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Laboratory of Metallurgy, Athens, Greece, (2010).

DOI: 10.20319/mijst.2017.32.122144

[2] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer: Inorganic polymeric new materials, J. Therm. Anal. 37 (1991) 1633-56.

[3] S. Detphan, P. Chindaprasirt, Preparation of fly ash and rice husk ash geopolymer, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 16 (2009) 720–726.

[4] T. Bakharev, Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack, Cement and Concrete Research. 35 (2005) 658–670.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005

[5] E.K. Attiogbe, S.H. Rizkalla, Response of concrete to sulfuric acid attack, ACI Materials Journal. 84 (1988) 481-8.

[6] V. Pavlík: submitted to Cem. Conc. Res. 24 (1994) 1495.

[7] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C 267, Standard test methods for chemical resistance of mortars, grouts, and monolithic surfacings and polymer concretes. (2003).

DOI: 10.1520/c0267-97

[8] V. Johansen, N. Thaulow, J. Skalny submitted to Adv. Cem. Res. 5 (1993) 23– 29.

[9] A. Fernandez-Jimenez, I. Garcı´a-Lodeiro, A. Palomo, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 3055–3065.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0584-8

[10] D. Miguel Mendoza, Effect of sulfuric acid exposure on common mineral dust particles, Celebrating Scholarship & Creativity Day. (2014) Paper 16.

[11] C. Grinter David, M. Nicotra, G. Thornton, Acetic Acid Adsorption on Anatase TiO2, J. Phys. Chem. C. 116 (21) (2012) 11643–11651.

DOI: 10.1021/jp303514g