[1]
G. Milani, M. Valente, Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: possibilities of non-linear Finite Elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms, Engineering Failure Analysis. 47 (2015).
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.016
Google Scholar
[2]
G. Milani, M. Valente, Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches, Engineering Failure Analysis. 54 (2015) 13-56.
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016
Google Scholar
[3]
G. Milani, M. Valente, Safety assessment of historical masonry churches based on pre-assigned kinematic limit analysis, FE limit and pushover analyses. 10th International Conference of computational methods in sciences and engineering, 4-7 April, Athens, Greece. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1618 (2014).
DOI: 10.1063/1.4897818
Google Scholar
[4]
G. Milani, G. Venturini, Safety Assessment of Four Masonry Churches by a Plate and Shell FE Nonlinear Approach, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 27 (2013) 27-42.
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000321
Google Scholar
[5]
M. Valente, G. Milani, Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North-East of Italy, Engineering Structures. 114 (2016) 241-270.
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.004
Google Scholar
[6]
M. Valente, G. Milani, Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM, Construction and Building Materials. 108 (2016) 74-104.
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025
Google Scholar
[7]
G. Milani, M. Valente, Numerical insight into the seismic behavior of eight masonry towers in Northern Italy: FE pushover vs non-linear dynamic analyses. 11th International Conference of computational methods in sciences and engineering, 20-23 March, Athens, Greece. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1702 (2015).
DOI: 10.1063/1.4938932
Google Scholar
[8]
Pro_SAP user's manual, Software for the design of civil engineering structures. www. 2si. it.
Google Scholar
[9]
CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, Berkeley, California, (2013).
Google Scholar
[10]
NTC 2008, Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministero delle Infrastrutture (GU n. 29 04/02/2008), Rome, Italy. [New technical norms on constructions], (2008).
Google Scholar
[11]
DPCM 2011, Linee guida per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche delle costruzioni di cui al decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008. [Italian guidelines for the evaluation and the reduction of the seismic risk for the built heritage, with reference to the Italian norm of constructions].
DOI: 10.3280/mis53-2020oa9852
Google Scholar
[12]
CNR-DT200, Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures, C.N.R., National Reaserch Council, Italy, Revision 8, (2012).
Google Scholar
[13]
M. Valente, Seismic upgrading strategies for non-ductile plan-wise irregular R/C structures, Procedia Engineering. 54 (2013) 539-553.
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.049
Google Scholar
[14]
M. Valente, Seismic performance assessment of a non-ductile RC building retrofitted by steel bracing or fiber-reinforced polymers, Applied Mechanics and Materials. 234 (2012) 84-89.
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.234.84
Google Scholar
[15]
G. Milani, P.B. Lourenco, A. Tralli, Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls. Part I: failure surfaces, Computers & Structures. 84 (2006) 166-180.
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.005
Google Scholar