Experiment and Numerical Simulation on Non-Magnetic Prestressed Beam

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to meet demanding of non-magnetic, changing the reinforcement ratio, the degree of prestress and cross section form, four partially prestressed concrete beam (3 T shape section, 1 rectangle section) were made with CFRP as longitudinal reinforcement and stirrup. The results show that: the pure bending sections of the test beams conform the plane-section assumption; the beams with bigger rate of reinforcement or with stronger prestress tends to appear more cracks with smaller spacing and width, also their cracking load were higher with relatively lesser deflection. The cracking load and ultimate load of T-shape beam are slightly larger than the rectangular beam’s, but their deflections are similar nearly. Based on experimental research, nonlinear finite element analysis software ANSYS was utilized to establish the model, the results of numerical simulation and experiments showed good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-9

Citation:

Online since:

March 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rasheeduzzafar F H D, Bader M A, Khan M M. Performance of Corrosion-Resisting Steels in Chloride-Bearing Concrete[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1992, 89(5).

DOI: 10.14359/2379

Google Scholar

[2] Meira G R, Andrade M C, Alonso M C, et al. Chloride penetration into concrete structures in marine atmosphere zone-influence of environmental characteristics[J]. Newsletter, (2015).

Google Scholar

[3] Morales M M T. Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Embedded Rebar, Cracks, Chloride Ingress and Corrosion on Electrical Resistivity Measurements of Reinforced Concrete[J]. (2015).

Google Scholar

[4] Huang Q, Shi X S, Wang Q Y, et al. The Influence of Carbonization on the Performances of Fly Ash Geopolymeric Concrete[C]/Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2015, 744: 1519-1526.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.744-746.1519

Google Scholar

[5] Wang Y G, Ma P, Huang K J, et al. Impact of Composite Mineral Admixture on Carbonization Resistance of High Performance Concrete[C]/Advanced Materials Research. 2015, 1095: 248-253.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1095.248

Google Scholar

[6] Calvet V, Valcuende M, Benlloch J, et al. Influence of moderate temperatures on the bond between carbon fibre reinforced polymer bars (CFRP) and concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 94: 589-604.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.053

Google Scholar

[7] Yao X Q, Xu X S. Experimental Study of Bending Properties of CFRP Bars Concrete Beam and Crack Analysis[C]/Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014, 578: 687-690.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.578-579.687

Google Scholar

[8] Lee Y H, Kim M S. Flexural Behavior and Deflection Prediction of Concrete Beams Reinforced with AFRP and CFRP Bars[J]. ACI Special Publication, 2012, 284.

DOI: 10.14359/51683809

Google Scholar

[9] Bischoff P H, Gross S P. Design approach for calculating deflection of FRP-reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2010, 15(4): 490-499.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000195

Google Scholar

[10] Cai J Y, He Y T, Liu Y Y, et al. Analysis on Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams with CFRP-GFRP Bars[C]/Advanced Materials Research. 2011, 163: 1565-1568.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.163-167.1565

Google Scholar

[11] Sharbatdar M K, Saatcioglu M, Benmokrane B. Seismic flexural behavior of concrete connections reinforced with CFRP bars and grids[J]. Composite Structures, 2011, 93(10): 2439-2449.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.009

Google Scholar

[12] Ahmad S H, Najm A B, Naani A. Flexural Behavior of near Surface Mounted CFRP Bars Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams[C]/Advanced Materials Research. 2012, 535: 1702-1710.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.535-537.1702

Google Scholar

[13] El-Hacha R, Gaafar M. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using prestressed, near-surface-mounted CFRP bars[J]. PCI journal, 2011, 56(4): 134-151.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.09012011.134.151

Google Scholar

[14] CLELAND D J. Strengthening an in-service reinforcement concrete bridge with prestressed CFRP bars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science A: An International Applied Physics & Engineering Journal), 2009, 5: 003.

Google Scholar

[15] Jin-ping Z. A research summarize about prestressed FRP bar concrete beam sliffness[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2008, 21: 010.

Google Scholar

[16] Stoll F, Saliba J E, Casper L E. Experimental study of CFRP-prestressed high-strength concrete bridge beams[J]. Composite structures, 2000, 49(2): 191-200.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(99)00134-8

Google Scholar

[17] Shaheen Ehab, Shrive Nigel.G. Reactive Powder Concrete Anchorage for Post-Tensioning with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Tendons. ACI Materials Journal, 2006, 103(6): 436-443.

DOI: 10.14359/18221

Google Scholar

[18] Mertol H C, Rizkalla S, Scott P, et al. Durability and fatigue behavior of high-strength concrete beams prestressed with CFRP bars[J]. ACI Special Publication SP245-1, "Case Histories and Use of FRP for Prestressing Applications, 2006: 1-20.

DOI: 10.14359/18759

Google Scholar

[19] El Aziz A, Fathy M. Analysis of concrete beams prestressed and post-tensioned with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars[J]. (2002).

Google Scholar

[20] Abdelrahman A A, Rizkalla S H, Saltzberg W. DEFLECTION AND CRACK CONTROL OF CONCRETE BEAMS PRESTRESSED BY CFRP BARS[C]/First International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure. (1996).

Google Scholar