On the Partial Pressure Measurement and Activity Calculation of Mn in the Ni-Cr-Co-Mo Alloy Melt

Article Preview

Abstract:

In metallurgical production processes, the vapor pressures and activity coefficients of impurity elements areconsidered as importantparameters in thermodynamic calculation. A saturated flow method was used to measure the dissolution equilibrium of Mn vapour over the surface of liquid Ni-Cr-Co-Mo alloys from 1773 to 1923K, and the measured results were employed in the calculation of the activities andactivity coefficients of Mn in liquid Ni-Cr-Co-Mo alloys. It is found that Mn showed a strong positive deviation from the Henry’s law, and the relationship between temperature and the standard free energy of dissolution reaction Mn(g)=[Mn]Ni-Cr-Co-Mowas determined to be . At 1873 and 1923K , the activity coefficient ƒof Mn in the Ni-Cr-Co-Mo alloymelt with 0.2wt.%Mn addition were calculated to be 1.065 and 1.068, respectively. According to the results mentioned above,the volatile lower limit of Mn can be up to 2.14 ppm in conventional vacuum melting production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

126-133

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.T. Holt,W. Wallace, Impurities and trace element in Nickel-base superalloys, Int. Met. Rev. 21 (1976) 1-24.

Google Scholar

[2] X.Y. Wei Q.B. Yang, Effect of Mn and Si on notch sensitivity of an Fe-Ni base superalloy, Acta. Metall. Sin. 20 (1984) A261-265.

Google Scholar

[3] C.B. Alcock, V.P. Itkin M.K. Horrigan, Vapour pressure equations for the metallic elements: 298-2500K, Can. Metall. Q. 23 (1984) 309-313.

DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309

Google Scholar

[4] I. Langmuir, The vapor pressure of metallic tungsten, Phys. Rev. 2 (1913) 329-342.

Google Scholar

[5] J.W. Edwards, H.L. Johnston W.E. Ditmars, Vapor pressures of inorganic substances. XI. Titanium between 1587 and 1764K, and copper between 1143 and 1292K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75 (1953) 2467-2470.

DOI: 10.1021/ja01106a055

Google Scholar

[6] A.L. Marshall, R.W. Dornte F.J. Norton, The vapor pressure of copper and iron, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59 (1937) 1161-1166.

DOI: 10.1021/ja01286a001

Google Scholar

[7] B.F. Peters D.R. Wiles, A vapor pressure study of the alloys of manganese with copper, Can. J. Chem. 41 (1963) 2591-2599.

DOI: 10.1139/v63-379

Google Scholar

[8] J.M. McCormack, J.R. Myers R.K. Saxer, Vapor pressure of liquid copper, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 10 (1965) 319-321.

DOI: 10.1021/je60027a004

Google Scholar

[9] F.T. Ferguso, K.G. Gardner J.A. Nuth, Vapor pressure of palladium from 1473K to 1973K, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 51 (2006) 1509-1515.

Google Scholar

[10] K. Lau, R. Lamoreaux,D. Hildenbrand, Vapor pressure determination of arsenic activity in a molten Cu-Fe-S matte, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 14 (1983) 253-258.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02661021

Google Scholar

[11] S.P. Garg, Y.J. Bhatt C.V. Sundaram, Thermodynamic study of liquid Cu-Mg alloys by vapor-pressure measurements, Metall. Trans. 4 (1973) 283-289.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02649628

Google Scholar

[12] Y.J. Bhatt S.P. Garg, Thermodynamic study of liquid Aluminum-Magnesium alloys by vapor-pressure measurements, Metall. Trans. B 7 (1976) 271-275.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02654926

Google Scholar

[13] C.Z. Wang, Research Methods in Metallurgical Physical Chemistry, Metallurgugy Industry Press, Beijing, 1992, pp.254-255.

Google Scholar

[14] J.P. Morris G.R. Zellars, Vapor pressure of liquid copper and activities in liquid Fe-Cu alloys, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 206 (1956) 1086-1090.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03377824

Google Scholar

[15] A. Tanaka, Determination of the activities in Mn-C and Mn-Si melts by the vapor-pressure measurements, T. Jpn. I. Met. 20 (1979) 516-522.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1960.20.516

Google Scholar

[16] S.P. Zeng, Z.J. Li,Z.K. Zha, Vaporization kinetics of antimony trisulfide and antimony trioxide, Eng. Chem. Metall. 9 (1988)87-94.

Google Scholar

[17] Z.H. Zhang, Y.Q. Su, D.Z. Chen, J.J. Guo H.Z. Fu, Dynamics model for evaporation loss calculation of alloying elements, Foundry. 58 (2009) 373-375.

Google Scholar

[18] Y.J. Duan, Physical chemistry fundamentals of impurity elements removal by evaporation in uranium melt, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, (2014).

Google Scholar

[19] O. Kubaschewshi C.B. Alcock, Metallurgical Thermochemistry, Metallurgugy Industry Press, Beijing, 1985, pp.168-169.

Google Scholar

[20] J.V. Lepore J.R. Van Wazer, A discussion of the transpiration method for determining vapor pressure, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 7 (1948) 1188-1196.

Google Scholar

[21] R. Pankajavalli, C. Mallika, O.M. Sreedharan, V.S. Raghunathan, P.A. Premkumar, K.S. Nagaraja, Thermal stability of organo-chromium or chromium organic complexes and vapor pressure measurements on tris(2, 4-pentanedionato)chromium(III) and hexacarbonyl chromium(0) by TG-based transpiration method, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00248-8

Google Scholar

[22] G.W.C. Kaye, T.H. Laby, Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants, World Publishing Corp., Beijing, 1999, p.248.

Google Scholar