Energy Absorption Efficiency of Open-Cell Carbon Foams

Article Preview

Abstract:

Energy absorbing properties of open-cell carbon foams were evaluated by quasi-static and dynamic compression tests. Though carbon foams show brittle deformation behaviors, they have wide plateau region. The plateau stress linearly increases with increasing the relative density. Furthermore, the strain rate sensitivity is 0.03 and 0.15 at low and high strain rate region, respectively. Indentation tests were performed on cylindrical sample having porosity of 92.3 to 92.8% with different impact speeds. No plateau region is observed and macro cracks occur in the high speed indentation test. The energy absorption efficiency of carbon foams is higher than that of conventional aluminum foams because of their wide plateau regions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

323-329

Citation:

Online since:

October 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Schwingel, H. W. Seeliger, C. Vecchionacci, D. Alwes, J. Dittrich, Aluminum foam sandwich structures for space applications, Acta Astronautica, 61 (2007), 326-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.022

Google Scholar

[2] J. Liu, Q. Qu, Y. Liu, R. Li, B. Liu, Compressive properties of Al-Si-SiC composite foams at elevated temperatures, J. Alloys Compd. 676 (2016), 239-244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.076

Google Scholar

[3] N. S. K. Ho, P. Li, S. Raghavan, T. Li, The effect of slurry composition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cell Inconel foams manufactured by the slurry coating technique, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 687 (2017), 123-130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.038

Google Scholar

[4] M. Inagaki, J. Qiu, Q. Guo, Carbon foam: Preparation and application, Carbon, 87 (2015), 128-152.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.021

Google Scholar

[5] H. Yamada, C. Kakuno, K. Tateyama, N. Ogasawara, Development of dynamic and impact load-measuring apparatus with opposite load-cells, Journal of JSEM 17 (2017), 117-123.

Google Scholar

[6] M. F. Ashby, The mechanical properties of cellular solids, Metall. Trans. 14A (1983), 1755-1769.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Michailidis, F. Stergioudi, A. Tsouknidas, Deformation and energy absorption properties of powder-metallurgy produced Al foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011), 7222-7227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.031

Google Scholar

[8] C. M. Cady, G. T. Gray III, C. Liu, M. L. Lovato, T. Mukai, Compressive properties of a closed-cell aluminum foam as a function of strain rate and temperature, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 525 (2009), 1-6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.007

Google Scholar