Procedure for Evaluating Competitiveness of Production Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

At present time a lot of methods are used for the assessment of product quality level, as well as its manufacturing perspectives. Only quantitative data can be used in order to compare the competitiveness of products, facilities, companies, etc. But methods for quantitative assessment of technological processes competitiveness have not been still proposed. The present paper describes a developed procedure for evaluation the competitiveness of technological processes. It takes into consideration the main factors which are used for estimation of process effectiveness: quality of products, level of applied technologies and production costs. In order to range these parameters, it is proposed to use weighting factors for each of them. An integrated efficiency index may vary within a range of 0 to 1. This method allows not only evaluating competitiveness of production processes, but also choosing the most rational production process, based on required properties of the processed item. The application of the developed approach is shown on the example of reinforcing steel manufacturing, which can be produced in different ways. The obtained results of calculation present a comparison of selected manufacturing techniques by the following parameters: strength and ductility properties of reinforcing bars, an applied forming method, possibility of a layer winding and a range of diameters of bars in coils. It is shown that the developed model makes it possible to determine a trend in development or adjustment of operating parameters for existing options of processes applied at an operating plant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

726-731

Citation:

Online since:

February 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.P. Tсeplit, A.A. Grigoreva, T.A. Skripkina, The models of supporting the strategic decisions on engineering products competitiveness, Applied Mechanics and Materials. 770 (2015) 656-661.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.770.656

Google Scholar

[2] J. Cao, L.L. Wang, X.P. Mu, The research on product quality competitiveness based on innovation, Advanced Materials Research. 744 (2013) 591-594.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.744.591

Google Scholar

[3] L. Gong, Sh. Tang, J. Xie, X. Chen, Construction and evolution analysis of a technology network for product innovative design. 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, June (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2017.8283133

Google Scholar

[4] S.F. Song, G.J. Li, Y.Sh. Suet, The fuzzy comprehensive assessment of brand competitiveness of property insurance companies, Applied Mechanics and Materials. 55-57 (2011) 1489-1493.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.55-57.1489

Google Scholar

[5] G.F. Qiu, H.F. Gao, Evaluation on core competitiveness of construction enterprise based on multi-level gray evaluation method, Advanced Materials Research. 838-841 (2014) 3096-3101.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.838-841.3096

Google Scholar

[6] Sh. Tang, L. Gong, J. Xie, Y. Liu. A competitiveness evaluation method of product based on technology maturity and development trend, 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, June (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2017.8282927

Google Scholar

[7] L. Song, Y.-sh. Geng, X.-.g. Wang, Research on evaluation method of ability of enterprise technology competition based on patent analysis, Informatics and Management Science IV, January (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4793-0_50

Google Scholar

[8] J. Ryu, S.Ch. Byeon, Technology level evaluation methodology based on the technology growth curve, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 78(6) (2011) 1049-1059.

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] Zh.-Sh. Zhang, X.-L. Zhao, Optimization of evaluation indexes of competitiveness of science technology and innovation based on quantitative approach, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography. 20(6-7) (2017) 1357-1362.

DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2017.1392446

Google Scholar

[10] G.L. Azoev, Analysis of activities of competitors, GAU, Moscow, (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] A.N. Rodionov, O.G. Kantor, Yu.I. Khomyakova, Evaluating competitiveness of products, Marketing in Russia and Abroad. 1 (2000) 17–27.

Google Scholar

[12] E.A. Kobets, Creating and evaluating competitiveness of products of mechanical engineering companies: essence, methods and implementation: dissertation for the degree of PhD (Economics), Taganrog, (2003).

Google Scholar

[13] V.A. Tanygin, Fundamentals of standardization and quality management, Publishing house of standards, Moscow, (1989).

Google Scholar

[14] N.P. Goncharova, P.G. Pererva, Marketing of an innovative process, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, (1998).

Google Scholar

[15] V.I. Zakharchenko, Competitiveness of machine-building products, Marketing in Russia and Abroad. 5 (1999) 26.

Google Scholar

[16] D. Waterman, A guide to expert systems, Mysl, Moscow, (1989).

Google Scholar

[17] V.V. Belyakov, M.E. Bushueva, V.I. Sagunov, Multicriteria optimization applied to evaluate competitiveness of mobile motor and tractor equipment and diagnose sophisticated technical systems, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, (2001).

Google Scholar

[18] Z. Ashtianipour, H. Zandhessami, An integrated ISM-DEMATEL model for evaluation of technological innovation capabilities' impact on the competitiveness of small & medium size enterprises (SMEs), 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, August (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/picmet.2015.7273092

Google Scholar

[19] N.N. Ermoshenko, E.I. Barsuchenko, Key trends in business activities in countries with developed market economies, Ukr ISTEI, Kiev, (1992).

Google Scholar

[20] Y.-.H. Hwang, Self-certification framework for technological innovation: A case study, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(7) (2014) 751-763.

DOI: 10.1108/ijqrm-10-2012-0139

Google Scholar

[21] T.J. Gordon, T.R. Munson, A proposed convention for measuring the state of the art of products and processes, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 20(1) (1981) 1-26.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(81)90038-x

Google Scholar

[22] R.M. Rosenthal. FMEA - a way to increase quality of products, Electronics: Science, Technology, Business. 7 (2010) 90-95.

Google Scholar

[23] A.S. Amirkhanyan, A.G. Brevnova, Advanced product quality planning, Current problems of Aviation and Cosmonautics. 2(8) (2012) 88–89.

Google Scholar

[24] V.L. Shper. QFD method, Quality Management Methods. 4 (2015) 52–53.

Google Scholar

[25] V. Colla, V. Renzo, B. Fornai, A. Amato. Comparison of different alternative steel technologies: Evaluation of case studies for an innovative and sustainable steelwork, Revue de Métallurgie, (2016).

DOI: 10.1051/metal/2016016

Google Scholar

[26] V.A. Kharitonov, I.M. Petrov, Evaluation of, and trends in an increase in competitiveness of coiled reinforcing bars, Vestnik Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 4 (2013) 65–69.

Google Scholar

[27] V.A. Kharitonov, I.M. Petrov, Efficient production of competitive steel rebar, Steel in Translation. 45(7) (2015) 517-520.

DOI: 10.3103/s0967091215070086

Google Scholar