Criteria of Mora-Coulomb with Three Parameters of Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

A modified Mohr – Coulomb criterion is presented. This criterion, in addition to adhesion and the angle of internal friction, contains the third parameter of the material (d). Depending on the value of this parameter (d), the modified criterion can take the form of the original Mohr – Coulomb criterion (with d = 0.5) or the original Treska criterion (with d = 0). For all other values of the parameter (d), varying in the range of 0 <d <0.5, the tangential stresses by the modified criterion are larger than the Mohr – Coulomb criterion, but less than the Tresca criterion. The paper presents the methodology and results of determining this parameter (d) using experiments on the triaxial compression of soils. The technique contains recommendations for the appointment the value of the axial strain of the sample material when determining the value of the parameter d. The value of the ultimate deformation is advisable to take in the range from 8 to 12%. This range is due to the fact that with axial deformation of the sample of 8%, the formation of slip areas begins in it, and with axial deformation of the sample 12%, the slip area is completely formed. In this case, the parameter d varies in the range 0 <d <0.5, having a shear strength bigger than in the Tresca criterion, but less than in the original Mohr – Coulomb criterion. The tangential stresses according to the modified criterion, on the contrary, have a bigger value than according to the Mohr – Coulomb criterion, but the values of the tangential stresses are lower than in the Tresca criterion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

863-869

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.M. Karaulov, K.V. Korolev, On the determination of the maximum earth pressure on retaining walls. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 4(52) (2015) 175-180.

DOI: 10.1007/s11204-015-9325-9

Google Scholar

[2] G.K. Arnold, Rutting of Granular Pavements. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham, 2004, 417 p.

Google Scholar

[3] A.N. Badanin, A.K. Bugrov, A.V. Krotov, The determination of the first critical load on particulate medium of sandy loam foundation. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 9(35) (2012) 29-34.

DOI: 10.5862/mce.35.4

Google Scholar

[4] J.P. Hambleton, A. Drescher, Modeling test rolling on cohesive subgrades, Advanced Characterisation of Pavement and Soil Engineering Materials. London, 2007, pp.359-368.

Google Scholar

[5] A.M. Hanna, G.G. Meyerhof, Experimental Evaluation of Bearing Capacity of Footings Subjected to Inclined Loads. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 18(4) (1981) 599-603.

DOI: 10.1139/t81-072

Google Scholar

[6] A.M. Karaulov, K.V. Korolev, A Static Solution for the Problem of the Stability of a Smooth Freestanding Sheet Pile Wall. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 4(54) (2017) 211-215.

DOI: 10.1007/s11204-017-9460-6

Google Scholar

[7] A.S. Aleksandrov, G.V. Dolgih, A.V. Smirnov, Improvement of calculation of stresses in the earth bed and layers of road clothes from granulated materials, Part 1, Analysis of decisions and a new method, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 463 (2018) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/463/2/022022

Google Scholar

[8] A.S. Aleksandrov, A.V. Smirnov, T.V. Semenova, Stress Investigation in Pavement Layers and a New Nalculation Model. Materials Science Forum. 945 (2019) 813-820.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.945.813

Google Scholar

[9] A.L. Kalinin, Application of modified yield criteria for calculation of safe pressures on the subgrade soil. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 4(39) (2013) 35–45.

DOI: 10.5862/mce.39.4

Google Scholar

[10] V.N. Gercog, G.V. Dolgikh, N.V. Kuzin, Calculation criteria for road pavement evenness. Part 1. Substantiating the flatness standards of asphalt pavement. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 5(57) (2015) 45–57.

DOI: 10.5862/mce.57.4

Google Scholar

[11] L.U. Sultanov, D.V. Berezhnoi, A.V. Karamov, FEM-based calculation of soil mass with the impact of dilatancy, Magazine of Civil Engineering. 4(48) (2014) 3–9.

DOI: 10.5862/mce.48.1

Google Scholar

[12] X. Xu, Z-H. Dai, Numerical implementation of a modified Mohr–Coulomb model and its application in slope stability analysis. Journal of Modern Transportation. 25(1) (2017) 40–51.

DOI: 10.1007/s40534-017-0123-0

Google Scholar

[13] K.V. Korolev, Intermediate Bearing Capacity of Saturated Bed of Strip Foundation, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1(51) (2014) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1007/s11204-014-9246-z

Google Scholar

[14] K.V. Korolev, Initial bearing capacity of saturated bed with different coefficients of pore-water pressure. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1(50) (2013) 7-13.

DOI: 10.1007/s11204-013-9202-3

Google Scholar

[15] K.V. Korolev, Terminal (Maximum) Bearing Capacity of the Saturated Bed of a Strip Foundation. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 4(50) (2013) 143-149.

DOI: 10.1007/s11204-013-9226-8

Google Scholar

[16] A.S. Aleksandrov, A.L. Kalinin, Improvement of shear strength design of a road structure. Part 1. Deformations in the Mohr – Coulomb plasticity condition, Magazine of Civil Engineering. 59(7) (2015) 4–17.

DOI: 10.5862/mce.59.1

Google Scholar

[17] Y. Higo et al., A three-dimensional elasto-viscoplastic strain localization analysis of water-saturated clay. Geo-Research Institute, Osaka, Japan. 86 3205–3240 (2006).

DOI: 10.1080/14786430500321203

Google Scholar

[18] F. Oka, Computational modeling of large deformations and failure of geomaterials, XVI ICSMGE, Osaka. (2005) 47– 94.

Google Scholar

[19] Y. Higo Instability and strain localization analysis of watersaturated clay by elasto-viscoplastic constitutive models. PhD thesis. Kyoto University, Japan (2003).

Google Scholar

[20] T.W. Lamb, R.V. Whitman, Soil Mechanics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons (1969).

Google Scholar

[21] A.L. Parrock, J.S. Strydom, V.J. Rieger, Why stabilise? Using triaxial tests for determining pavement stiffness and shear strength parameters of mechanically modified layers. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering. 50(1) 2008 2–12.

Google Scholar

[22] T. J. B. Taweel, E. Sokolova, V. Sergeev, D. B. Solovev, Energy and Exergy Analysis of Clinker Cooler in the Cement Industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 463 (2018) Paper № 032101. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/463/3/032101.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/463/3/032101

Google Scholar